Hi,
I need to install the SERi proxy. Would you please let me know what
version of Linux should I put in my system before the installation of
SERi?
Thanks,
Mary
Hi, first of all I'm sorry for this OffTopic.
I'm looking for a good SIP PBX since Asterisk SIP implementation doesn't let
me using it in a multidomain SIP enviroment properly with OpenSer ("From"
domain not respected when generates a SIP channel, no good behaviour in
parallel forking, etc). I can use it just as media server for now.
So I'm looking for other SIP PBX server. One I've in mind is, of course,
WeSIP, but I'd like to know if any of you has good experiences integrating
other PBX's as FreeSwitch or SipX/SipFoundry.
If possible, it would be really great a SIP PBX with virtual domains support,
so the PBX logic for independent SIP domains would exist in the same
server/PBX (less and easy maintenance).
The aim of this PBX is to allow SIP incoming calls and during the execution of
the dialplan maybe call to that domain users (registered in a multidomain
main OpenSer).
Please, any opinion or experience about it with some of those PBX's? I'm going
now to install and try of all them, but some help would be really
appreciated.
Thanks a lot. Regards.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es
well it depends -- doing what you are suggesting literally is quite tricky
and I'm not sure this IMS feature is worth the effort. IF you would like to
register and be then available under all of your aliases (both "that address"
and "his tel-uri"), you can easily use aliases.
-jiri
At 14:52 15/11/2007, Magnus Sörman wrote:
>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8278E.D8F42EB4"
>
>Hi,
>
>How do you/could you configure SER to use implicit registration set?
>If e.g. a user with a sip URI registers, then both that address and his tel-uri should be registered.
>
>Thanks,
> /Magnus Sorman
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.iptel.org", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Best Price for VIAGRA & CIALIS ONLINE, All Credit Cards
Accepted, FREE DELIVERY http://www.foodenter.com [...]
Content analysis details: (18.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
2.7 DRUG_ED_ONLINE BODY: Fast Viagra Delivery
0.5 DRUG_ED_CAPS BODY: Mentions an E.D. drug
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 0.9999]
1.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
[URIs: foodenter.com]
4.1 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist
[URIs: foodenter.com]
2.1 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist
[URIs: foodenter.com]
3.0 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist
[URIs: foodenter.com]
0.5 DRUGS_ERECTILE Refers to an erectile drug
Hi everyone:
I have been working with NATHELPER or MEDIAPROXY to handle audio and video calls. However I have got into the point that there should be another way to work Firewalls and NAT transversal rather than mediaproxies and rtp-proxies.
I have heard about STUN servers with ICE support but never seen it working and I wonder if this works. And I dont know any server like this, and I know that the softphones or IPphones need to support it.
If I dont want to force the audio or video to come to my server, what kind of solution is the most recommendable?
Best regards,
/Carlos
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
El Martes, 20 de Noviembre de 2007, Daniel Grotti escribió:
> Hi Inaki,
> Thank you for your help.
> I've a question, does Serial Forking (with LCR) work well with NAT ?
Sure, there is not difference. Just force RtpProxy (or MediaProxy) in each
branch (when neccesary).
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
after upgrading from openser 1.2 to 1.3 trunk the core commands
unix_sock, sock_mode, sock_user, sock_group are missing. Does anybody
know what happend to this commands ?
regards
helmut
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHQuo/4tZeNddg3dwRAkx9AKCPRZKGfyOxbox73Asf+aaIgAWLnACfc/Uu
IepPGsTGfNwJt2p1frTRSwM=
=VFPA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hey
Is it possible to do with openser/nathelper what some other sip/nat gateways do?
- for initial register, keep location, but pass registration packets upstream -> save("location", 0x02)
- when there's a nat flag set, rewrite response to client with very low "Expire:" header
- accept frequent register packets from client, but register on real server, when original expire time is reached
It's basically natping done the other way - should be more stable, because when one natping doesn't reach the client, it's lost till next register / invite from that phone.
With registers, phone tries to sent packets itself, so when one is lost, next one will reactivate nat anyway.
Is there any module that does it now? Or does it need some avp & database hacking?
Hi,
Im having some cpl-c module problems..
Both are related to time-switch.
What it seems to me like is that bymonth parameter is parsed somehow
wrong which then causes overflow. I added bit more debug and attr_name
and attr_len seem to be completely off-the-track. (The actual line
number of the overflow in cpl_switches.h is 763 because of the one line
added.)
Input:
<time dtstart="20071101T090000" dtend="20171101T090000" byhour="7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20">
Output:
openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_run_script: processing CPL node
openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_run_script: processing time-switch node
openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl-c:run_time_switch: checking recv. time stamp <1195111240>
openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl-c:set_TZ: switching TZ as "TZ=Europe/Helsinki"
openser[5160]: ---> fill = Thu Nov 15 09:20:40 2007
openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [0], attr_len: [16]
openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [0] found :[20071101T090000]
openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [1], attr_len: [16]
openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [1] found :[20171101T090000]
openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [19], attr_len: [12592]
openser[5160]: ERROR:cpl_c: overflow detected ip=0xb5a3c8ec ptr=0xb5a3fa6e in func. cpl_switches.h, line 764
openser[5160]: DEBUG:cpl-c:set_TZ: switching TZ as "TZ="
openser[5160]: ERROR:cpl_c:cpl_run_script: script error
Second problem is the byhour attribute, which doesnt seem to be supported
at all.
Input:
<time dtstart="20071101T090000" dtend="20171101T090000" byhour="7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20">
Output:
openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_run_script: processing CPL node
openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_run_script: processing time-switch node
openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl-c:run_time_switch: checking recv. time stamp <1195111623>
openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl-c:set_TZ: switching TZ as "TZ=Europe/Helsinki"
openser[5162]: ---> fill = Thu Nov 15 09:27:03 2007
openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [0], attr_len: [16]
openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [0] found :[20071101T090000]
openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [1], attr_len: [16]
openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [1] found :[20171101T090000]
openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:testing, attr_name: [9], attr_len: [39]
openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl_c:run_time_node: attribute [9] found :[7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]
openser[5162]: ERROR:cpl_c:run_time_switch: unsupported attribute [9] found in TIME node
openser[5162]: DEBUG:cpl-c:set_TZ: switching TZ as "TZ="
openser[5162]: ERROR:cpl_c:cpl_run_script: script error
Br,
Aki Rehn
Hi,
I'm trying to set up openser with TLS support with mysql database, on
Debian. In fact, i could not even start openser with succes.
When using "openserctl start":
Starting OpenSER:
ERROR: PID file /var/run/openser.pid does not exist -- OpenSER start failed
when using "openser":
Listening on
udp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060
udp: 164.41.14.213 [164.41.14.213]:5060
tcp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060
tcp: 164.41.14.213 [164.41.14.213]:5060
Aliases:
tcp: unbvoip3.cic.unb.br:5060
tcp: localhost:5060
tcp: localhost.localdomain:5060
udp: unbvoip3.cic.unb.br:5060
udp: localhost:5060
udp: localhost.localdomain:5060
*: voip.unb.br:*
but it's not running, since my "ps aux | grep openser" cannot find it.
Sugestions???
Thanks,
Marcio
