sr-users September 2007

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

158 participants
248 discussions

[OpenSER-Users] Free BSD 6.0 and SEAS problem.
by Kuddusi 20 Sep '07

20 Sep '07

Hi, I am using default seas configuration. When I tried to start openser seas module can not be loaded althoug module is compiled without problem. I tried 1.2.0 and 1.2.2 and the same problem occurred. It seems that it could not find "dprintf" function. How can I solve this problem? root@~: openser -ddddddddddd 0(43499) loading module /usr/local/lib/openser/modules/tm.so 0(43499) DEBUG: register_pv: tm 0(43499) xl_add_extra_spec: extra items list is not initialized 0(43499) xl_add_extra_spec: inserting extra item [T_branch_idx] at [0] 0(43499) xl_add_extra_spec: inserting extra item [T_reply_code] at [1] 0(43499) loading module /usr/local/lib/openser/modules/seas.so 0(43499) ERROR: load_module: could not open module </usr/local/lib/openser/modules/seas.so>: /usr/local/lib/openser/modules/seas.so: Undefined symbol "dprintf" and config is below Thanks, Kuddusi CIFTCIBASI. # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=9 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) #fork=yes #log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) children=4 # Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode fork=no log_stderror=yes # reply_to_via=1 listen = tcp:84.51.32.24:5060 listen = udp:84.51.32.24:5060 port=5060 # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- #set module path #mpath="/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/seas.so" modparam("seas", "listen_sockets","84.51.32.24:5080") modparam("seas", "stats_socket","84.51.32.24:5088") #modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ if(!as_relay_t("app_server_one")){ t_reply("500","No App Server"); } }

2 2

[OpenSER-Users] Do we like the same books?
by voipexpert 20 Sep '07

20 Sep '07

I just joined Shelfari to connect with other book lovers. Come see the books I love and see if we have any in common. Then pick my next book so I can keep on reading. Click below to join my group of friends on Shelfari! http://www.shelfari.com/Register.aspx?ActivityId=16229378&InvitationCode=84… voipexpert Shelfari is a free site that lets you share book ratings and reviews with friends and meet people who have similar tastes in books. It also lets you build an online bookshelf, join book clubs, and get good book recommendations from friends. You should check it out. -------- You have received this email because voipexpert (sunkara.raviprakash.feb14(a)gmail.com) directly invited you to join his/her community on Shelfari. It is against Shelfari's policies to invite people who you don't know directly. Follow this link (http://www.shelfari.com/actions/emailoptout.aspx?email=Users@openser.org&ac…) to prevent future invitations to this address. If you believe you do not know this person, you may view (http://www.shelfari.com/voipexpert) his/her Shelfari page or report him/her in our feedback (http://www.shelfari.com/Feedback.aspx) section. Shelfari, 616 1st Ave #300, Seattle, WA 98104

1 0

[Serusers] Creating a test scenario to test NATing..
by Piyush.Bansal＠relianceada.com 20 Sep '07

20 Sep '07

hi all, I wanna simulate a test scenario in which the sip clients are behind NAT (whether same or different NAT, in some private network), and the SER and MediaProxy are running on some public IP. My question is, in this case the client is not able to communicate with the server through the Firewall / NAT. My SIP messages are being dropped at the Firewall itself. Can anybody tell me, what could be the reason behind that????? I'm totally stuck at this point..... plz revert asap... thanx in advance.. The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should return it to the sender immediately. Please note that while we scan all e-mails for viruses we cannot guarantee that any e-mail is virus-free and accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] openser + freeradius + cdrtool in freebsd
by Sam Wun 20 Sep '07

20 Sep '07

Hi, I found openser and freeradius in the freebsd ports tree, but the cdrtools is a tool for CD ISO in freebsd. Is this the right cdrtools for freesradius? In the CDRtools website, it said: http://download.dns-hosting.info/CDRTool/ "CDRTool provides mediation, accounting and tracing for Call Detail Records generated by OpenSER by using RADIUS protocol and OpenSER siptrace facility. " It seems that the CDrtools in freebsd ports tree is not the one for freeradius. Thanks W

1 0

Re: [OpenSER-Users] OpenSER with MySQL Cluster
by Christian Schlatter 19 Sep '07

19 Sep '07

Kerker Staffan wrote: > hi > ok, thanks for the update. i kind of dropped that > track as i had all those errors. > > with your experience, is that a better solution than > using the t_replicate? i'm only synchronizing two servers. Well, there is a trade-off between the complexity of a mysql cluster deployment and the possible inconsistencies introduced by t_replicate. With mysql cluster, you can always be sure that both of your proxies have the same, consistent view of the registration state. This comes at the prize of deploying and maintaining the db cluster. t_replicate is a lightweight replication mechanism that doesn't ensure registration state consistency. I like the simplicity of this approach. Personally, I prefer having a consistent registration state. I also think that the mysql guys have done a great job in making the cluster deployment and management as easy as possible. /Christian > > best regards, > /staffan > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Christian Schlatter [mailto:cs@unc.edu] >> Sent: den 19 september 2007 15:42 >> To: Kerker Staffan >> Cc: Juha Heinanen; users(a)openser.org >> Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] OpenSER with MySQL Cluster >> >> >> Kerker Staffan wrote: >>> hi >>> i'm curious about this one. we used to run a dual Openser >> installation >>> with MySQL cluster, but this proved to very unstable (on >> the cluster >>> side). >>> is this working fine now? >>> >>> for instance, if one of the mysql cluster nodes was >> disconnected, this >>> could lead to complete cluster shut down, and nodes didn't handle >>> reconnect very good. >>> >>> so, we actually switched to the register replication instead... >> We're running a mysql 5.0.22 cluster for our two redundant >> openser proxies. This setup works very stable for about a year now. >> >> In the beginning our cluster was shutting down itself quite >> regularly e.g. after a network failure. Since then we >> >> - are running the management nodes on hosts that are >> connected to the data nodes through different network paths >> (this is essential, a cluster node needs to be able to solve >> the splitbrain problem) >> >> - have added 'StopOnError = 0' to the data node settings >> (this causes a data nodes to try to reconnect after it lost >> communication to its neighbors, per default, a data node just >> shuts itself down) >> >> - added enough DataMemory and IndexMemory for the data nodes >> (DataMemory = 1024M, IndexMemory = 64M) >> >> >> Overall I'm quite pleased with our mysql cluster solution, >> although I'd >> prefer a solution where the UAs do register with both of our >> proxies, so >> that there is no need to replicate registration state between >> the proxies. >> >> Our mysql cluster basically only contains the 'location' >> table since we >> store all account data on redundant LDAP/H350 directories. >> >> >> /Christian >> >> >> >>> best regards >>> /Staffan >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: users-bounces(a)openser.org >>>> [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On Behalf Of Christian Schlatter >>>> Sent: den 18 september 2007 23:37 >>>> To: Juha Heinanen >>>> Cc: users(a)openser.org >>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] OpenSER with MySQL Cluster >>>> >>>> >>>> Juha Heinanen wrote: >>>> ... >>>>> unfortunately you then cannot support presence. using >>>> another proxy >>>>> for presence is not a solution either, because same users >> need both >>>>> presence and other sip methods. >>>> What exactly prevents me from using a dedicated presence >>>> server? And why can't I support presence with db_mode=3? >>>> >>>> E.g. if I just want to deploy a simple PA using the PRESENCE >>>> module, I don't see any dependencies on USRLOC. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure if PUA_USRLOC depends on db_mode<3, but at least >>>> the documentation doesn't mention it. And it looks to me like >>>> I could use >>>> pua_set_publish() from PUA_USRLOC to send a PUBLISH to my >>>> dedicated presence server ;-) ... I haven't tried that though. >>>> >>>>> by the way, looks like presence related requests are by >> far the most >>>>> common ones if all sip UAs have presence turned on. it means that >>>>> presence would also create biggest db activity. >>>> Yes, I know, SIP presence is very chatty. >>>> >>>> >>>> /Christian >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Users mailing list >>>> Users(a)openser.org >>>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>>> >>

1 0

[Serusers] Mediaproxy in public IP e two client behind same Nat
by pistara_bros＠tin.it 19 Sep '07

19 Sep '07

Hi to All, I'm investigating again about Mediaproxy and SER , but in this test i'm using the the testbed of smile.ing.uniroma1.it whic use SER and Mediaproxy in a public ip 151.100.122.144 I'm using Client_A (X- lite) running on WindowsXP 192.168.123.10 and Client_B (X-lite) running on WindowsXP 192.168.123.168 My Lan use a router with a public ip 83.211.41.253 So the clients are behind the same Nat. Using ethereal i see that during the conversation the RTP packet dont' pass through the Mediaproxy in public ip (151.100.122.144) but the packet go directly from one computer to another of my Lan. So the question is : what SER architecture (with Mediaproxy or with SEMS or other..) i have to use in order to have a proxy RTP that work as man in the middle and manage all RTP Traffic between the two clients? Please help me. thanks.

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] UAC module with Asterisk
by Halomoan Chow 19 Sep '07

19 Sep '07

Dear All Now I want to try UAC module to solve the proxy authentication to Asterisk. Until now it still fail even the username/password and realm are already correct 100% Then I found this statement "For sending authentication credentials to the termination provider openser has the "uac" module. But be aware that this module does not always works as it does not increase the cseq when sending the INVITE with credentials (search the archive for details). E.g. the uac module wont work if the termination providers uses Asterisk (as Asterisk checks the cseq)" Actually why UAC module has this limitation and why this does not get solved until now? Thanks Regards Halomoan Zhou

1 0

[Serusers] MeadiaProxy + SER + X-lite in the same Lan.
by pistara_bros＠tin.it 19 Sep '07

19 Sep '07

I want correct my previous posted sentences : "My guess is mediaproxy makes a test on the IPs (they are 192.168.147.2 and 192.168.147.3) and refuses to proxy the call." with "My guess is mediaproxy makes a test on the IPs (they are 192.168.123.168 and 192.168.123.10) and refuses to proxy the call." Does Anyone encounter this problem? could you share your opinion, with me?. Thanks. Orazio

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] memory allocation issue
by Benko 19 Sep '07

19 Sep '07

Hello! I wanted to upgrade a server from 1.1.0 to 1.2.2 today but despite extensive testing beforehand i have some trouble: After starting with the new openser-binary, it didn't allow any registrations and answered with "500 server error occured". Logging said: Sep 18 17:23:12 [/sbin/openser] ERROR: sip_msg_cloner: cannot allocate \ memory_ Sep 18 17:23:12 [/sbin/openser] ERROR: new_t: out of mem:_ Sep 18 17:23:12 [/sbin/openser] ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed_Sep 18 and 17:23:12 [/sbin/openser] ERROR: sip_msg_cloner: cannot allocate memory_ Sep 18 17:23:12 [/sbin/openser] ERROR: store_reply: can't alloc' clone \ memory_ after restarting it with "-m 128"(according to the faq) these errors are gone, but it still doesn't accept registrations and prints: Sep 18 17:24:16 [/sbin/openser] ERROR:tm:print_uac_request: no shmem_ Sep 18 17:24:16 [/sbin/openser] ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: failure to \ add branches_ Sep 18 17:24:16 [/sbin/openser] ERROR:tm:w_t_relay: t_forward_nonack \ failed_ [update] - after several restarts, the first error-messages appeared again. When i run the new version on port 5061(old production server 1.1.0 is running parallel on port 5060) i can register with the new server(on port 5061) without problems. I have the vague impression that the new instance can't free memory, but why does it work when i run it on a different port? Any clues? Regards Christian

2 3

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER with MySQL Cluster
by Vasile Zaharia 19 Sep '07

19 Sep '07

Hi *, Normally, OpenSER should work just fine with a MySQL Cluster, but I would like to know if anyone has tried this configuration yet. Are there any configuration settings I should be aware of? Thanks, Sica. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC

8 16

← Newer
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
...
25
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users September 2007