I just joined Shelfari to connect with other book lovers. Come see the books I love and see if we have any in common. Then pick my next book so I can keep on reading.
Click below to join my group of friends on Shelfari!
http://www.shelfari.com/Register.aspx?ActivityId=16229378&InvitationCode=84…
voipexpert
Shelfari is a free site that lets you share book ratings and reviews with friends and meet people who have similar tastes in books. It also lets you build an online bookshelf, join book clubs, and get good book recommendations from friends. You should check it out.
--------
You have received this email because voipexpert (sunkara.raviprakash.feb14(a)gmail.com) directly invited you to join his/her community on Shelfari.
It is against Shelfari's policies to invite people who you don't know directly. Follow this link (http://www.shelfari.com/actions/emailoptout.aspx?email=Users@openser.org&ac…) to prevent future invitations to this address. If you believe you do not know this person, you may view (http://www.shelfari.com/voipexpert) his/her Shelfari page or report him/her in our feedback (http://www.shelfari.com/Feedback.aspx) section.
Shelfari, 616 1st Ave #300, Seattle, WA 98104
hi all,
I wanna simulate a test scenario in which the sip clients are behind NAT
(whether same or different NAT, in some private network), and the SER and
MediaProxy are running on some public IP.
My question is, in this case the client is not able to communicate with
the server through the Firewall / NAT. My SIP messages are being dropped
at the Firewall itself.
Can anybody tell me, what could be the reason behind that?????
I'm totally stuck at this point..... plz revert asap...
thanx in advance..
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should return it to the sender immediately. Please note that while we scan all e-mails for viruses we cannot guarantee that any e-mail is virus-free and accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
Hi,
I found openser and freeradius in the freebsd ports tree, but the
cdrtools is a tool for CD ISO in freebsd. Is this the right cdrtools
for freesradius?
In the CDRtools website, it said:
http://download.dns-hosting.info/CDRTool/
"CDRTool provides mediation, accounting and tracing for Call Detail
Records generated by OpenSER by using RADIUS protocol and OpenSER
siptrace facility.
"
It seems that the CDrtools in freebsd ports tree is not the one for freeradius.
Thanks
W
Kerker Staffan wrote:
> hi
> ok, thanks for the update. i kind of dropped that
> track as i had all those errors.
>
> with your experience, is that a better solution than
> using the t_replicate? i'm only synchronizing two servers.
Well, there is a trade-off between the complexity of a mysql cluster
deployment and the possible inconsistencies introduced by t_replicate.
With mysql cluster, you can always be sure that both of your proxies
have the same, consistent view of the registration state. This comes at
the prize of deploying and maintaining the db cluster. t_replicate is a
lightweight replication mechanism that doesn't ensure registration state
consistency. I like the simplicity of this approach.
Personally, I prefer having a consistent registration state. I also
think that the mysql guys have done a great job in making the cluster
deployment and management as easy as possible.
/Christian
>
> best regards,
> /staffan
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christian Schlatter [mailto:cs@unc.edu]
>> Sent: den 19 september 2007 15:42
>> To: Kerker Staffan
>> Cc: Juha Heinanen; users(a)openser.org
>> Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] OpenSER with MySQL Cluster
>>
>>
>> Kerker Staffan wrote:
>>> hi
>>> i'm curious about this one. we used to run a dual Openser
>> installation
>>> with MySQL cluster, but this proved to very unstable (on
>> the cluster
>>> side).
>>> is this working fine now?
>>>
>>> for instance, if one of the mysql cluster nodes was
>> disconnected, this
>>> could lead to complete cluster shut down, and nodes didn't handle
>>> reconnect very good.
>>>
>>> so, we actually switched to the register replication instead...
>> We're running a mysql 5.0.22 cluster for our two redundant
>> openser proxies. This setup works very stable for about a year now.
>>
>> In the beginning our cluster was shutting down itself quite
>> regularly e.g. after a network failure. Since then we
>>
>> - are running the management nodes on hosts that are
>> connected to the data nodes through different network paths
>> (this is essential, a cluster node needs to be able to solve
>> the splitbrain problem)
>>
>> - have added 'StopOnError = 0' to the data node settings
>> (this causes a data nodes to try to reconnect after it lost
>> communication to its neighbors, per default, a data node just
>> shuts itself down)
>>
>> - added enough DataMemory and IndexMemory for the data nodes
>> (DataMemory = 1024M, IndexMemory = 64M)
>>
>>
>> Overall I'm quite pleased with our mysql cluster solution,
>> although I'd
>> prefer a solution where the UAs do register with both of our
>> proxies, so
>> that there is no need to replicate registration state between
>> the proxies.
>>
>> Our mysql cluster basically only contains the 'location'
>> table since we
>> store all account data on redundant LDAP/H350 directories.
>>
>>
>> /Christian
>>
>>
>>
>>> best regards
>>> /Staffan
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: users-bounces(a)openser.org
>>>> [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On Behalf Of Christian Schlatter
>>>> Sent: den 18 september 2007 23:37
>>>> To: Juha Heinanen
>>>> Cc: users(a)openser.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] OpenSER with MySQL Cluster
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Juha Heinanen wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>> unfortunately you then cannot support presence. using
>>>> another proxy
>>>>> for presence is not a solution either, because same users
>> need both
>>>>> presence and other sip methods.
>>>> What exactly prevents me from using a dedicated presence
>>>> server? And why can't I support presence with db_mode=3?
>>>>
>>>> E.g. if I just want to deploy a simple PA using the PRESENCE
>>>> module, I don't see any dependencies on USRLOC.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure if PUA_USRLOC depends on db_mode<3, but at least
>>>> the documentation doesn't mention it. And it looks to me like
>>>> I could use
>>>> pua_set_publish() from PUA_USRLOC to send a PUBLISH to my
>>>> dedicated presence server ;-) ... I haven't tried that though.
>>>>
>>>>> by the way, looks like presence related requests are by
>> far the most
>>>>> common ones if all sip UAs have presence turned on. it means that
>>>>> presence would also create biggest db activity.
>>>> Yes, I know, SIP presence is very chatty.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /Christian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users(a)openser.org
>>>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>
Hi to All,
I'm investigating again about Mediaproxy and SER , but in
this test i'm using the
the testbed of smile.ing.uniroma1.it whic use
SER and Mediaproxy in a public ip 151.100.122.144
I'm using Client_A (X-
lite) running on WindowsXP 192.168.123.10
and Client_B (X-lite) running
on WindowsXP 192.168.123.168
My Lan use a router with a public ip
83.211.41.253
So the clients are behind the same Nat.
Using ethereal i
see that during the conversation the RTP packet dont' pass through the
Mediaproxy in public ip (151.100.122.144) but the packet go directly
from one computer to another of my Lan.
So the question is :
what SER
architecture (with Mediaproxy or with SEMS or other..) i have to use in
order to
have a proxy RTP that work as man in the middle and manage all
RTP Traffic between the two clients?
Please help me.
thanks.
Dear All
Now I want to try UAC module to solve the proxy authentication to
Asterisk. Until now it still fail even the username/password and realm
are already correct 100%
Then I found this statement
"For sending authentication credentials to the termination
provider openser has the "uac" module. But be aware that this module
does not always works as it does not increase the cseq when sending the
INVITE with credentials (search the archive for details). E.g. the uac
module wont work if the termination providers uses Asterisk (as
Asterisk checks the cseq)"
Actually why UAC module has this limitation and why this does not get
solved until now?
Thanks
Regards
Halomoan Zhou
I want correct my previous posted sentences :
"My guess is mediaproxy
makes a test on the IPs (they are 192.168.147.2 and 192.168.147.3) and
refuses to proxy the call."
with "My guess is mediaproxy makes a test
on the IPs (they are 192.168.123.168 and 192.168.123.10) and refuses to
proxy the call."
Does Anyone encounter this problem? could you share
your opinion, with me?.
Thanks. Orazio
Hello!
I wanted to upgrade a server from 1.1.0 to 1.2.2 today but despite
extensive testing beforehand i have some trouble:
After starting with the new openser-binary, it didn't allow any
registrations and answered with "500 server error occured".
Logging said:
Sep 18 17:23:12 [/sbin/openser] ERROR: sip_msg_cloner: cannot allocate \
memory_
Sep 18 17:23:12 [/sbin/openser] ERROR: new_t: out of mem:_
Sep 18 17:23:12 [/sbin/openser] ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed_Sep 18
and
17:23:12 [/sbin/openser] ERROR: sip_msg_cloner: cannot allocate memory_
Sep 18 17:23:12 [/sbin/openser] ERROR: store_reply: can't alloc' clone \
memory_
after restarting it with "-m 128"(according to the faq) these errors are
gone, but it still doesn't accept registrations and prints:
Sep 18 17:24:16 [/sbin/openser] ERROR:tm:print_uac_request: no shmem_
Sep 18 17:24:16 [/sbin/openser] ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: failure to \
add branches_
Sep 18 17:24:16 [/sbin/openser] ERROR:tm:w_t_relay: t_forward_nonack \
failed_
[update] - after several restarts, the first error-messages appeared
again.
When i run the new version on port 5061(old production server 1.1.0 is
running parallel on port 5060) i can register with the new server(on
port 5061) without problems.
I have the vague impression that the new instance can't free memory,
but why does it work when i run it on a different port? Any clues?
Regards
Christian
Hi *,
Normally, OpenSER should work just fine with a MySQL Cluster, but
I would like to know if anyone has tried this configuration yet.
Are there any configuration settings I should be aware of?
Thanks,
Sica.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
Hi everybody.
Does anybody has any example about how to configure the permissions module
to use address validation from database configuration tables?
In our setup, we observe an inconsistent behaviour when defining subnets;
fifo command subnet_dump does not show the expected subnet.
The only case wich works well is wehn mask is set to 32.
Thanks in advance for your attention.
Sergio Gutierrez
EPM Telecomunicaciones
Medellin - Colombia