sr-users August 2008

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

144 participants
202 discussions

[Serusers] Gentilini, Paul is out of the office.
by PGentilini＠intellicare.com 09 Aug '08

09 Aug '08

I will be out of the office starting 08/08/2008 and will not return until 08/11/2008. Please contact the CSC at 888-899-4227 if you need immediate assistance.

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] Compiling MediaProxy 2.0 on CentOS 5
by Andrew Yager 09 Aug '08

09 Aug '08

Hi, Apologies if you have already seen this on the OpenSIPS users list; it seems that some of the domain changes are a little confusing for the moment. I'm trying to compile MediaProxy 2.0 on CentOS 5 for use with Kamailio. I've installed libnetfilter_conntrack from RPMForge, but I am getting an error with compiling. ./setup.py build running build running build_py running build_ext building 'mediaproxy.interfaces.system._conntrack' extension gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,- D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer- size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -fPIC - DMODULE_VERSION=2.0.3 -DIPTABLES_VERSION="1.4.0" -Imediaproxy/ interfaces/system/libiptc/include -I/usr/include/python2.4 -c mediaproxy/interfaces/system/_conntrack.c -o build/temp.linux- x86_64-2.4/mediaproxy/interfaces/system/_conntrack.o mediaproxy/interfaces/system/_conntrack.c: In function ‘ForwardingRule_init’: mediaproxy/interfaces/system/_conntrack.c:223: error: ‘NFCT_SOPT_SETUP_REPLY’ undeclared (first use in this function) mediaproxy/interfaces/system/_conntrack.c:223: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once mediaproxy/interfaces/system/_conntrack.c:223: error: for each function it appears in.) error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1 Current IPTABLES info: % iptables --version iptables v1.3.5 % lsmod | grep conntrack ip_conntrack_netbios_ns 36033 0 ip_conntrack 91237 1 ip_conntrack_netbios_ns nfnetlink 40457 1 ip_conntrack Is there a package I am missing, or am I simply fighting a loosing battle and need to use a different flavor of Linux to get it to work easily? Thanks, Andrew -- Andrew Yager, Managing Director (MACS BCompSc MCP) Real World Technology Solutions Pty Ltd ph: 1300 798 718 or (02) 9037 0500 fax: (02) 9037 0591 mob: 0405 152 568 http://www.rwts.com.au/ or http://www.stonebridgecomputing.com.au/

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] failure route issue
by Mouncif Benniane 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

I am using openser 1.3, I can't make the failure_route to work properly. here is my config: modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 2) # set fr_timer route{ if (is_method("INVITE")) { avp_delete("*"); if (avp_db_query("SELECT prefix,grp_id,priority,custid,did,ip,port,failure_set,failure_i p,failure_port FROM test_table WHERE prefix='$rU'","$avp(s:prefix);$avp(s:grp_id);$avp(s:priority);$avp(s:custid);$avp(s:did);$avp(s:ip);$avp(s:port );$avp(s:failure_set);$avp(s:failure_ip);$avp(s:failure_ port)")) { $ru = "sip:"+$rU + "@" + $avp(s:ip) + ":" + $avp(s:port); if ($avp(s:failure_set) == y ) { $avp(i:3) = 3; t_on_failure("1"); t_relay(); } } } else { xlog("L_NOTICE", "avp_db_query() returned no records or failed query\n"); }; } ### END OF ROUTING failure_route[1] { # status is 408 if openser session timer fires if (t_check_status("408")) { $ru = "sip:"+$rU + "@" + $avp(s:failure_ip) + ":" + $avp(s:failure_port); t_relay(); } } route[1] { # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; exit; } So I set ip field to no responsive one and failure_ip to responsive one, but still the invite does not fail to the last one (failure_ip) after the timeout. Am I doing something wrong? cheers!!

3 4

[Kamailio-Users] Kamailio in orange (logo submission).
by Alex Balashov 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

I have a logo submission from someone who works with me at Evariste - of artistic inclinations. I don't know what the proper submission path for the logos is, so I'm posting it here. Sorry if that's annoying. -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599

2 3

[Kamailio-Users] parameter 'ftag' and 'avp'
by Steven Wu 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

Hi all, What is meaning of ftag or avp parameter in Record-Route herder? SER inserted this Record-Route. As far as know, OpenSER is come from SER. Best regards, Steven Wu

2 1

[Kamailio-Users] comments to pointed openser issues
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

Hello, these issues were pointed in the first place, my comments follow inline. 1) the need for a new reliable release - delayed or low-quality releases are affecting the credibility of the project - http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/users/2008-August/018999.html - the link above shows this one was a faster release than in past - http://www.kamailio.net/mos/view/KAMAILIO-v1.4.0-Released/ - the link above shows the efforts in creating a testing suite which was running on devel server during this development cycle - the link above shows no much new things in the core, but code cleanup, duplicity removal, source code documentation 2) degradation of the project quality - testing, performance measurements and code quality control are overlooked - presented before, testing suite was built and running, lot of code was reviewed and improved - who in the new project will do that and couldn't do it because was blocked in the old project 3) lack of the control, management and coordination of the project - critical project issues could not be handled or solved - I am not aware of mis-coordinations that could affect the project so badly - I am not aware of critical issues that could not be solved and there was no report of a critical deadlock - if there was a failure in management, all from the board share same fault Moreover, I believe there are facts in the past that openser took care of its quality. I repeat as I said that QA might not be enough no matter is done. If openser 1.3.x is the core component of a platform hosting about 2 millions of subscribers does not ensure some QA, then nothing else can be said, see: http://www.ilocus.com/2008/03/the_largest_voip_offering_base.html None above motivates such reactions as happened recently, but if does, then probably with some openess and discussions everything would have been better now. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] OpenSIPS vs. Kamailio
by Darren Sessions 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

I have to say, this is probably one of the harder decisions I've had to make in a very long time. I have to say the OpenSER / SER decision was much easier. While I obviously don't know all the details of what's gone on between Bogdan and Henning or whomever else, I just really have a hard time swallowing Hennings explanation of what happened and his, what seems to be, emotional reaction. More so than that, it seems like there were quite a few decisions made by the board without immediately letting the community know about it, even quite a while after these decisions were made. While I do not dispute Hennings technical ability, It is my opinion that his disrespectful attitude, his "shotgun" conduct, and his obvious lack of management ability is not befitting of someone on Kamailio project's board regardless of who is at fault here. Honestly, I'm a bit disappointed that Daniel hasn't said more as well. I met him at the fall VON in 2005 and he was indeed very pleasant and I enjoyed our conversation. All I've heard is things like 'not wanting to discuss any further', etc. - but the fact remains that wether it's a comfortable topic or not, there are quite a few of us that are using OpenSER in a commercial environment and these are things that we NEED to know in order to make an informed decision. In the end, all I know is now there are two projects and I have to choose which one. Based on what I've read in the change-logs, my direct experience with Bogden in a technical support role directly related to SER at a previous business - my company will be using OpenSIPS going forward. I have a very high regard for virtually all of the Kamailio / OpenSER group, and again, I am disappointed and absolutely hate that I've been forced into a position to have to make a decision like this. I will continue to be active on both sets of lists for the foreseeable future to monitor progress. Having said all that, I can't tell you how much I hope things can still be resolved and we can all have a unified project. I would implore the Kamailio board to do whatever it takes to bring Bogdan back into the group for the sake of the community. Hopefully something like that won't be just a dream. Thanks, - Darren _____________________________ dmsessions(a)gmail.com http://www.darrensessions.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/dsessions _____________________________

5 5

[Kamailio-Users] releases history
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

Hello, as there were accuses about a delayed release, I am showing the dates when a major release was out: June 14, 2005 - first openser release, just a rebuild of ser 0.9.x October 28, 2005 - openser 1.0.0 July 10, 2006 - openser 1.1.0 (after more than 8 months) March 12, 2007 - openser 1.2.0 (after more than 8 months) December 13, 2007 - openser 1.3.0 (after more than 9 months) August 7, 2008 - openser 1.4.0 (less than 8 months) So, maybe my memory is damaged, but you should be able to learn it from mailing lists and web. I do not buy that motivation about project quality degradation in release management. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] openser board summary
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

Hello guys, first I apologize for the situation we are in and for my silence in the last days as I tried to get the release out and not put gas on fire. The board looks like being now an evil thing, maybe it is our fault we haven't given more details about insights, but there were not many as ones could imagine and the decisions were presented to community. Here are the outlines of the discussions on the board, since September 2005, when first mail came there: 2005-09 DCM: decide release number => resulted in openser 1.0.0 DCM: business mailing lists => resulted in creation of the list 2005-10 AG: asks about making AG a trusted CA for default delivery of openser => self signed or something invalid to force users to change 2005-11 DCM: starts discussion about making an openser statute DCM: puts in dicussion the behavior of Harry on the mailing lists DCM: contacts Harry 2005-12 ALL: continuation of previous mail discussions 2006-03 DCM: plans for new release 2006-04 JH: discussion about presence implementation 2006-05 BIA: about project hosting: still sourceforge or move out ALL: Sourceforge problems discussions JH: presented some options for hosting 2006-06 AG: sip summer code JH: about 1.1.0 2006-07 JH: presence server AG: minutes if SIMPLE WG at IETF DCM: GPL issue with openssl and debian 2006-08 BIA: openser summit 2006-09,10 ALL: openser summit 2006-11 AG: history update in relation with old project BIA: TLS discussion 2006-12 ALL: history update 2007-01 KD: FOSDEM DCM: openser 1.1.1 BIA: openser at spring von 2007-02 BIA: openser donnations DCM: openser events 2007-04 BIA: Linuxtag 2007-09 DCM: summit 2007 2007-10 CS: retires from board BIA: proposes Henning => no decision as no rules for electing, makes that a point in todo BIA: openser 1.2.3 2007-11 DCM: openser business environment => hosting it within the website couldn't get a decision, posponed with alternative for dedicated site BIA: new developer Maxim Sobolyev 2008-03 BIA: on the 28th announces to board the issues with trademark, apparently some board member and other people were already aware AG: openser pages update 2008-04 ALL: agreed with rename - started the idea of a foundation to register trademark, takes on managing resources HW (not a member at that time but was included in the discussions related to TM) - proposes new developer Iouri 2008-05 BIA: on the 12th started the discussion about new name foreseeing 2 directions: something similar, to remember about the old project, or something totally different 2008-06 DCM: 9th: paypal report for last year => total donations to project's sourceforge account 52.05Euro (DCM Paypal account closed, the money still at DCM, proposed to use them for buying domains for new name) DCM: 9th: forwards a proposal received at end of April to team(a)openser.org from PacktPub to donate 2% or 5% (if we keep news on the site about the book) of openser book sales to the project. DCM asked for decision as there was no legal entity to deal with. (note: team(a)openser.org was created at the time openser forked in 2005, to get private feedback at that time, was used for the summit 2006 for contact, open for any post, includes the founders, about 10 good mails out of thousands spams per year) BIA: 9th: adds that in a discussion with PacktPub (not on team or board, as I haven;t seen such) proposed to give the 5% for openser devel course organized by him. The course was announced to the lists on the 4th of June. DCM: 9th: expressed surprise as he thought that was a different deal, made privately between BIA and PacktPub BIA: ask the board about donation, saying that actually the 5% donation was not really accounted ALL: There was no decision of what to do with the sponsorship as the board has no treasurer and we are working towards creating a foundation that can accept legally fundings. There was no ask for some amount of money for the devel course, no costs presented, no other details given. Nobody expressed a disagreement of giving funds for the devel course. BIA: 9th : replacement for Cesc as quick solution to deal with TM => suggests Henning Westerholt, all the other agree up to 17th DCM: asks Henning and then sends short announcement to community BIA: complains that he actually hasn't voted and the replacement was made in hurry (?!?!) DCM: presents that all other announcements were done more or less in the same fashion in the past, asking to propose improvements DCM: 24th - asks decision about local_route, board discusses and agrees to enclose in #ifdef HW: 25th - announces the result and asks BIA if he agrees, no response, he was away HW: after 1 day since asking BIA for agreement SVN is updated enclosing local_route in ifdefs BIA: 27th - disagrees with board decision, considering it was not the business of the board (sent to public as well) -- Note from DCM: opensips was registered at June 25, 2008, 17:30 according to http://sourceforge.net/projects/opensips/ Discussions with name proposals and foundation 2008-07 Others: discussions related to name and foundation HW: proposes a project renaming plan HW: on the 16th, vote for name: proposes Kamailio, majority reached on the 17th, last that agree (with a mention that he does not really like the name) BIA, on the 28th, after a call from HW where he mentioned he was away. AG: 17th - registers kamailio.org, ... AG: prposes unification of 1.4. and renaming => decided to announce first to allow time for renaming without pressure AG: 28th - announces renaming to public HW: some drafts of foundation if in Germany AG: details about alternative in Netherlands 2008-08 DCM: 4th - discovers news on voip-info.org that openser becomes opensips, Dan Pascu sends a mixed recipient message and some others see something is going on DCM: after short investigation and learning that behind opensips is bogdan decide to take some precaution actions and send details about them on board to decide if they still remain or roll back BIA: comes later on the mailing lists and announces the fork From then on most of the things were reflected on the public. No one was kicked out from the project, as developer, board member or simply list user, just some administrative rights were limited. Of course last three months have a lot of messages for the topics above. I hope I haven't missed something important and I ask other board members to correct or improve. With this one I hope things are a bit more clear about what board did so far, where were mistakes and wrong decisions. You judge! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com

1 0

[Serusers] ser 2.1 - compilation error - conflicting types
by Tomasz Zieleniewski 08 Aug '08

08 Aug '08

Hi, When I try to compile ser from sources I get the following conflicting types errors: gcc -m64 -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -minline-all-stringops -falign-loops -ftree-vectorize -mtune=opteron -Wall -DNAME='"ser"' -DVERSION='"2.1.0-dev23-make"' -DARCH='"x86_64"' -DOS='linux_' -DOS_QUOTED='"linux"' -DCOMPILER='"gcc 4.3.1"' -D__CPU_x86_64 -D__OS_linux -DSER_VER=2001000 -DCFG_DIR='"/usr/local/etc/ser/"' -DMODS_DIR='"/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/"' -DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MEM -DSHM_MMAP -DDNS_IP_HACK -DUSE_IPV6 -DUSE_MCAST -DUSE_TCP -DDISABLE_NAGLE -DHAVE_RESOLV_RES -DUSE_DNS_CACHE -DUSE_DNS_FAILOVER -DUSE_DST_BLACKLIST -DUSE_NAPTR -DDBG_QM_MALLOC -DUSE_TLS -DTLS_HOOKS -DFAST_LOCK -DADAPTIVE_WAIT -DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024 -DCC_GCC_LIKE_ASM -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME2 -DHAVE_UNION_SEMUN -DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -DHAVE_MSG_NOSIGNAL -DHAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H -DHAVE_TIMEGM -DHAVE_SCHED_SETSCHEDULER -DHAVE_EPOLL -DHAVE_SIGIO_RT -DSIGINFO64_WORKARROUND -DUSE_FUTEX -DHAVE_SELECT -c lock_ops.c -o lock_ops.o In file included from ut.h:53, from lock_ops.c:28: /usr/include/sys/types.h:46: error: conflicting types for 'loff_t' /usr/include/linux/types.h:30: error: previous declaration of 'loff_t' was here /usr/include/sys/types.h:62: error: conflicting types for 'dev_t' /usr/include/linux/types.h:13: error: previous declaration of 'dev_t' was here In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:133, from ut.h:53, from lock_ops.c:28: /usr/include/time.h:105: error: conflicting types for 'timer_t' /usr/include/linux/types.h:22: error: previous declaration of 'timer_t' was here In file included from ut.h:53, from lock_ops.c:28: /usr/include/sys/types.h:198: error: conflicting types for 'int64_t' /usr/include/linux/types.h:98: error: previous declaration of 'int64_t' was here /usr/include/sys/types.h:204: error: conflicting types for 'u_int64_t' /usr/include/linux/types.h:97: error: previous declaration of 'u_int64_t' was here In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:220, from ut.h:53, from lock_ops.c:28: /usr/include/sys/select.h:78: error: conflicting types for 'fd_set' /usr/include/linux/types.h:12: error: previous declaration of 'fd_set' was here In file included from ut.h:53, from lock_ops.c:28: /usr/include/sys/types.h:235: error: conflicting types for 'blkcnt_t' /usr/include/linux/types.h:124: error: previous declaration of 'blkcnt_t' was here make: *** [lock_ops.o] Błąd 1 Is there any fix for that? Regards Tomasz

5 11

← Newer
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
21
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users August 2008