sr-users March 2013

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

92 participants
141 discussions

packaging v4.0.0
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 04 Mar '13

04 Mar '13

Hello, (cross-posting as this decision may be done properly with feedback from both developers and users community). Now that we have some band new modules but also several that were not packaged by Kamailio, just by ser (due to single modules directory), I was thinking we may want to reconsider a bit the packages we do for v4.0.0. 1) A new package is related to the bunch of IMS modules, that is pretty much obvious. 2) There are few modules targeting development samples or troubleshooting: print, print_lib and malloc_test - I think they should not be packaged. 3) I would create a special package for the modules using uid-based database schema: db2_ops uid_auth_db uid_avp_db uid_domain uid_gflags uid_uri_db uri_db 4) Maybe we should merge some packages by dependencies: - a) some depend on libxml2: cpl-c xhttp_pi xmlrpc xmlops - b) some depend on libssl: tls auth_identity outbound 5) Some experimental modules with external deps will stay unpackaged like so far: db_oracle Opinions? Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, April 16-17, 2013, Berlin - http://conference.kamailio.com -

1 0

When to rewrite o= in SDP ?
by Khoa Pham 04 Mar '13

04 Mar '13

Hi, I read in http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.4.x/nathelper.html that Kamailio might rewrite ip address in o= in SDP to facilitate NAT traversal. It may decide to use to original IP or use IP of RTP server. What factors affect its decision ? -- Khoa Pham HCMC University of Science Faculty of Information Technology

2 3

UnixODBC cant insert sip_capture record on sql server
by Grant Bagdasarian 03 Mar '13

03 Mar '13

Hello, We are using SQL Server 2008 as our database. When the sip_capture module tries to insert a row, the following error is given: db_unixodbc [con.c:220]: unixodbc:SQLExecDirect=42000:1:156:[FreeTDS][SQL Server]Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'authorization'. Using Kamailio 3.3.4. Is there a way to force brackets around the column values? Regards, Grant

2 3

uac_replace_from / New URI shorter than old URI
by Ronald Voermans 03 Mar '13

03 Mar '13

Hi, this last weekend we went live from the old 3.0 version to the latest stable release of Kamailio (3,3,0). All went well, except for one issue. We make use of uac_replace_from in our config, in case a client needs CLIR: uac_replace_from("Anonymous","sip:anonymous@anonymous.invalid"); Since the upgrade we receive the following error: uac [replace.c:521]: new URI shorter than old URI Which causes the call to be disconnected after about 20/30 seconds. This, because the ACK is received by Kamailio, but cannot be 'linked' to the transaction i guess. What is exactly causing this issue and, more importantly, is there any way to resolve this? Thanks in advance, Regards, Ronald Voermans

2 4

Which is first, t_on_reply or callbacks in C ?
by David 03 Mar '13

03 Mar '13

Hello, Can someone tell me which is executed first ? the on reply route setup with t_on_reply() or the callbacks in the code that allows the module dialog to insert the confirmed dialog into the dialog table ? Thanks, David

2 1

not able to install Kamailio
by Julián Quintero 03 Mar '13

03 Mar '13

Hello thereI hope that you can help me, I have an issue installing Kamailio, when I issue th command "make all" I receive the following error resolve.h:471:4: error: #error neither gethostbyname2 or getipnodebyname present make: *** [action.o] Error 1 I am using debian squeeze, please let me know if there is something missing in my system or what is not allowing to install the SIP Server THanks Julián

3 3

t_lookup.c: WARNING: script writer didn't release transaction - problem
by Efelin Novak 03 Mar '13

03 Mar '13

Hi folks, we have a serious issue with tm module. In Fail route we would like to send a reply 404 when a cr_route function fails(no destination found). We use t_reply("404", "No route to destination"). However after the call is disconnected with a 404 reply the tm module writes a following warning WARNING: tm [t_lookup.c:1543]: WARNING: script writer didn't release transaction Very soon after this error message is shown a segfault occurs. Log is as follows: Mar 3 15:26:46 hostname kamailio[791]: ERROR: carrierroute [cr_func.c:594]: desired routing domain doesn't exist, prefix 0039333333333, carrier 14, domain 2 Mar 3 15:26:46 hostname kamailio[791]: WARNING: tm [t_lookup.c:1543]: WARNING: script writer didn't release transaction //ACK is received Mar 3 15:26:52 hostname kernel: [771134.093250] kamailio[796]: segfault at 4 ip 0815c182 sp bf8ace00 error 6 in kamailio[8048000+1ea000] Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[803]: : <core> [pass_fd.c:293]: ERROR: receive_fd: EOF on 15 Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[790]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:785]: child process 796 exited by a signal 11 Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[790]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:788]: core was generated Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[790]: INFO: <core> [main.c:800]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[802]: INFO: <core> [main.c:851]: INFO: signal 15 received Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[799]: INFO: <core> [main.c:851]: INFO: signal 15 received Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[801]: INFO: <core> [main.c:851]: INFO: signal 15 received Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[798]: INFO: <core> [main.c:851]: INFO: signal 15 received Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[800]: INFO: <core> [main.c:851]: INFO: signal 15 received Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[797]: INFO: <core> [main.c:851]: INFO: signal 15 received Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[792]: INFO: <core> [main.c:851]: INFO: signal 15 received Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[803]: INFO: <core> [main.c:851]: INFO: signal 15 received Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[795]: INFO: <core> [main.c:851]: INFO: signal 15 received Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[791]: INFO: <core> [main.c:851]: INFO: signal 15 received Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[794]: INFO: <core> [main.c:851]: INFO: signal 15 received Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[793]: INFO: <core> [main.c:851]: INFO: signal 15 received Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kamailio[790]: INFO: <core> [mem/f_malloc.c:532]: freeing a free fragment (0x886b3ad8/0x886b3ae0) - ignore Mar 3 15:26:53 hostname kernel: [771135.681720] kamailio[790]: segfault at 7dd193e0 ip 0816f5cd sp bf8acc20 error 4 in kamailio[8048000+1ea000] Currently we have fixed it using a custom route route(T_REPLY); . . . route[T_REPLY] { sl_send_reply("404","No route to destination"); } This works correctly with no error or a warning message or a segfault. We are using kamilio version: kamailio 3.3.4 (i386/linux) f8c8f2 Is this behavior a bug or should I dig deeper into the tm documentation? Kind regards Efelin

2 1

Karl Smith
by Karl Smith 02 Mar '13

02 Mar '13

witwcvrf ictniydtoz.vsd/http://www.loudounwalkin.com/sq/f7nax0z0n2ouq77adgkgejjvnz.g… yklxx.vsd/knc hj.vsd/

1 0

RPM packages for v3.3.4
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 01 Mar '13

01 Mar '13

Hello, the RPM packages for latest minor release v3.3.4 were created on openSuse build service. More details and download links at: - http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/packages/rpms Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, April 16-17, 2013, Berlin - http://conference.kamailio.com -

1 0

Karl Smith
by Karl Smith 01 Mar '13

01 Mar '13

http://www.louiselemelin.com/sinkzm/hhir5ew9drwu4s54d429jdnj.d?a6dfinu09fqc… Smith3/1/2013 3:00:01 PM

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2013