sr-users January 2014

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

93 participants
142 discussions

Error with ACK from SIPML5
by Jayesh Nambiar 14 Feb '14

14 Feb '14

Hello All, I have a setup which is SIPML5 -> Kamailio(Websocket) -> Freeswitch. All I am trying to do is initiate a call from SIPML5 and Play a Music file from freeswitch. This works, but the call hangs up after 30 seconds due to ACK timeout from from the SIPML5. What I can see is the SIPML5 from Chrome does send an ACK on websocket, but I see the following error in kamailio syslog: *via_builder(): TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found* *ERROR: <core> [msg_translator.c:1725]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header* *ERROR: <core> [forward.c:607]: forward_request(): ERROR: forward_request: building failed* *ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:371]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (1/SL)* Can someone help me understand what I am missing here and why kamailio is not able to create a VIA header to forward this request towards freeswitch. I have built a simple config file by following https://gist.github.com/jesusprubio/4066845 as reference. Any help in understanding this is really appreciated. Thanks, --- Jayesh

4 11

About a bug when registering a Tandberg (Cisco) E20 to Kamailio - Crash Segfault at 18 IP - error 4 in auth_db.so
by Pedro Niño 12 Feb '14

12 Feb '14

Kamailio is having a crash (Segfault at 18 IP - error 4 in auth_db.so) when registering a cisco E20, via SIP Here is a full dbg backtrack, and the core dump, but have no ideas about how to proceed. Im using Kamailio 4.1.1: Got this Error at /var/log: [14629359.586980] kamailio[982]: segfault at 18 ip 00007f034db8dcfd sp 00007fff34702950 error 4 in auth_db.so[7f034db85000+c000] Kamailio Version: ---------- version: kamailio 4.1.1 (x86_64/linux) d6ffa1 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: d6ffa1 compiled on 16:28:48 Jan 29 2014 with gcc 4.4.5 ------------- Thanks in Advance.

2 2

bug in authdb_mod ??
by jay binks 06 Feb '14

06 Feb '14

So when Im trying to use is_subscriber & load_credentials together, It seems I have either hit a bug or just a bad config ( but I dont think its the latter ) My symptom is that only the field on the far right of "load_credentials" ever returns the correct value, the other fields are always null. My config has this setting : modparam("auth_db", "load_credentials", "field1;field2") and I can see the following debug when running kamailio -ddddd 0(14174) DEBUG: auth_db [authdb_mod.c:291]: w_is_subscriber(): uri [sip: 1112(a)192.168.173.5] table [subscriber] flags [1] 0(14174) DEBUG: db_cassandra [dbcassa_base.cpp:807]: db_cassa_query(): query table=subscriber 0(14174) DEBUG: db_cassandra [dbcassa_table.c:461]: dbcassa_db_get_table(): found dbname=kamailio, table=subscriber 0(14174) DEBUG: db_cassandra [dbcassa_base.cpp:351]: cassa_constr_key(): query col = username 0(14174) DEBUG: db_cassandra [dbcassa_base.cpp:351]: cassa_constr_key(): query col = domain 0(14174) DEBUG: db_cassandra [dbcassa_base.cpp:376]: cassa_constr_key(): key = 1112 192.168.173.5 0(14174) DEBUG: db_cassandra [dbcassa_base.cpp:499]: cassa_translate_query(): Query col: field2 0(14174) DEBUG: db_cassandra [dbcassa_base.cpp:499]: cassa_translate_query(): Query col: field1; field2 0(14174) DEBUG: db_cassandra [dbcassa_base.cpp:501]: cassa_translate_query(): get 2 columns 0(14174) DEBUG: <core> [db_res.c:118]: db_new_result(): allocate 56 bytes for result set at 0x7fc6ce770e78 if I had to put money on where the bug is, I would look in parse_aaa_pvs in authdb_mod.c however, an initial glance revealed nothing glaring, also this file was last changed in *2013-01-20 ( and that was only a move from modules_k )* SURELY I cant be the only person wanting to use this for more than one field ? This code looks like its almost the same as when first committed in August 2011 .... Id love someone to see if they can confirm this and point me in the right direction ( if this is my fault ) or lets get this fixed, if its a bug :) -- Sincerely Jay

2 5

Asterisk re-INVITE race condition, error 500.
by David K 04 Feb '14

04 Feb '14

Hello all, So I have three machines, we don't care about audio for this problem, so everything I mention here is SIP related. Freeswitch <--> Kamailio 3.3.2 <--> Asterisk 1. Asterisk sends an INVITE to Freeswitch through the Kamailio proxy. 2. Kamailio replies 100 Trying and forwards to Freeswitch 3. Freeswitch replies 100 Trying 4. Freeswitch replies 180 Ringing to Kamailio 5. Kamailio routes the answer to Asterisk 6. Freeswitch replies 200 OK to Kamailio 7. Kamailio replies 200 OK to Asterisk 8. Asterisk replies ACK to Kamailio 9. Asterisk sends a re-INVITE to Freeswitch through Kamailio 10. Kamailio routes the re-INVITE to freeswitch 11. Kamailio routes the ACK to freeswitch. 12. Freeswitch replies 500 Server error because it got a re-INVITE before the ACK. So, my problem is that Kamailio seems to process my re-INVITE more quickly than the ACK. So Freeswitch replies an error because it got the re-INVITE before the ACK. So my "solution" is to add a usleep(20); for re-INVITEs on Kamailio, but I think this is a lousy solution. Has anyone here had to deal with problems where Kamailio routes a re-INVITE faster than an ACK causing endpoints to return error messages? Has anyone had to deal with a similar issue? Thanks, David

6 11

Media-proxy Query
by Nandini madhu 04 Feb '14

04 Feb '14

Dear All, Greetings, I have configured Kamailio (4.0.3) with mediaproxy server, with this set-up audio/video calls are going good and hence NAT issue has solved. I have used two soft clients: 1) IMSDroid 2) Bria. But i have a query about media-proxy statistics i.e in the syslog, the info about media-proxy activity is shown as below: *Case 1*: when Call between two IMSDroid clients. caller_codec : 'Unknown(73)' callee_codec : 'Unknown(73)' callee_ua : 'unknown agent'. *Case 2* : When call between two Bria clients. 'callee_ua': 'unknown agent'. (Calls using Bria clients media-proxy's syslog shows Audio codec names, but using IMSdroid clients it is showing 'Unknown' for Audio codec names ). Find the attachment below for the full syslog about the mentioned unknown behaviour. And also find my kamailio.cfg file. And also logging in the syslog as shown like RTP: Unknown , RTCP: Unknown. In this context, there is a jitter in audio calls and pixelled video sometimes, So is there any wrong with the above mentioned "unknown' factor in this problem of jitter/pixelled audio/video calls ? (AFAIK these payload type 73 (i.e 72-76) is reserved for RTCP conflict avoidance. right? ) What could be the problem for this 'Unknown' issue? How can i solve this issue ? Anything can be done in kamailio script? And how these RTCP payload types (72-76) plays a role in audio/video calls? Any suggestions will greatly help. please help me in clarifying these issues. Thanks in advance. Regards, Nandini

2 3

Security hygiene for Kamailio
by davy 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

Hi all, we all enjoy our FAIL2BAN and snippets of our Kamailio config when we see it successfully fight off the "friendly-scanner", and multiple futile attempts to fool our systems. But it got me thinking… What is a sufficient level of security on our Kamailio machinery… ? Are we all just doing whatever, or is the nature of the beast, that every setup is different? Eventually while having a beer, we will end up in the discussion Kamailio is as good (and even much better) as most of the commercially available SBCs. But, imho, that all depends on the configuration. There are a few good reads available, and on the security front I personally love Pike, Topoh, Dnssec, Htable and recently I think I'm doing rather clever stuff with CNXCC… And I do feel comfortable on my setups, them won't be hacked… But do we have a-sort -of stake in the ground example configuration which we can consider as being more than sufficiently secure? Some config where we can tick off all the known security risks for SIP (as chapter 26 of rfc3261 gives a state of the art back in 2002) Or would that be a nice idea for a micro project? Grtz, Davy

6 12

Carrierroute - scan_prefix
by Oliver Roth 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

Hi all I need a solution to get the used scan_prefix in carrierroute module. We have different carriers for our destinations, sometimes split up 50%/50% or other splittings - all routes with failure routes. Now if one destination is not reachable, then I would like to get this information and reroute to another carrier. As we use the carrierroute module, we use the "description" to get the carriername (for billing purposes). Is there a solution to get the used scan_prefix from the carrierroute module? Regards, Oli

2 2

ngcp-mediaproxy-ng media address
by Kelvin Chua 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

somehow, mediaproxy is ignoring the media address set via rtpproxy_manage("co","10.17.0.102"); anybody tried this before? Jan 31 09:03:29 kam2 mediaproxy-ng[20455]: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:46077: answer - { "sdp": "v=0#015#012o=root 345956998 345956998 IN IP4 10.17.0.105#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 11.7.0#015#012c=IN IP4 10.17.0.105#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 15712 RTP/AVP 97 3 0 8 101#015#012a=rtpmap:97 speex/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=ptime:20#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012", "replace": [ "session-connection", "origin" ], "call-id": "yqtupxcwsnbmcbo@X340saucy", "received-from": [ "IP4", "10.17.0.105" ], "media address": "22.9.18.15", "from-tag": "kjoel", "to-tag": "as478f57f3", "command": "answer" } Jan 31 09:03:29 kam2 mediaproxy-ng[20455]: Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp541:v=0#015#012o=root 345956998 345956998 IN IP4 10.17.0.102#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 11.7.0#015#012c=IN IP4 10.17.0.102#015#012t=0 0#015#012a=ice-lite#015#012m=audio 10002 RTP/AVP 97 3 0 8 101#015#012a=rtpmap:97 speex/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=ptime:20#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=rtcp:10003#015#012a=ice-ufrag:QocOqhlR#015#012a=ice-pwd:HZ7WUgsHAKlLGp1n2FAzEwWsS9gj#015#012a=candidate:pMoXfVtH0dDfxpoa 1 UDP 2130706432 10.17.0.102 10002 typ host#015#012a=candidate:pMoXfVtH0dDfxpoa 2 UDP 2130706431 10.17.0.102 10003 typ host#015#0126:result2:oke Kelvin Chua

2 4

Kamailio without tls
by Neville D'Souza 01 Feb '14

01 Feb '14

Hi Support, I have recently kamailio 4.0.x version with tls on port 5061. Now our development team needs to connect to it using unencrypted on port 5060 to test an app for features and then work towards connecting through tls connection. So my question is how do I temporarily disable tls to test all the features on the kamailio server and then once feature testing is done revert back to tls connection? Best Regards, Neville D'Souza

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] [Kamailio-Business] Fosdem this year
by Ivo V 01 Feb '14

01 Feb '14

Hi, My 2 colleague and me (3 total) like to join the Kamailio dinner. We went to Beermania 2 years ago with the Jitsi guys and DanB and I can confirm the perfect fries! Ivo

4 6

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users January 2014