sr-users January 2014

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

93 participants
142 discussions

Kamailio: MI Command: 'trusted_dump' and 'trusted_reload'
by José Luis Millán 22 Apr '15

22 Apr '15

Hi, I'm using 'allow_trusted()' from Permissions module without a problem in a Kamailio 4.0 routing logic. It does just work, but the MI command 'trusted_dump' tells me that the module is not in use: ''' server:/home/jmillan# kamctl fifo trusted_dump 500 Trusted-module not in use ''' Doing a 'trusted_reload' does neither make any query to database to retrieve the data. Other MI commands of same module do work correctly. ie: 'address_reload' or 'address_dump' Note: I have tested in a Kamailio 1.5 and the result is the same. Regards. -- José Luis Millán

4 3

File transferring issue
by Wingsravi R 25 Mar '15

25 Mar '15

Dear Kamailio'ns, I am working on kamailio Server (V 4.0) installed on Ubuntu 12.04 system. Currently i am trying file transfer feature using IMSDroid SIP clients. file transferring is fine between two IMSDroid clients but at the receiving end (file recipient) i cont see the sender identity/ sender name. it is just displaying as 'null' (Screen shot is attached). But the full file is transferring to destination address without any problem. I have configured MSRP module related script in my kamailio configuration file (find the attachment). but i guess it is not invoking anyway when file transferring and the file transferring is negotiating client-to-client basis. And also find Sip capture of file transfer (ngrep based) for better understanding. What could be the problem? Why at the file recipient side it is not displaying sender's identity (instead it is 'null')? how can i resolve this issue? Anyone please help me in resolving this issue. Any help will greatly appreciate. Regards, Ravi.

5 6

Re: [Kamailio-Users] /usr/local/sbin/kamdbctl create error
by vivi 01 Nov '14

01 Nov '14

Hi all.. I have solve the problem . Cheers, vivi From: vivi [mailto:vivi.hilton@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 11:29 PM To: 'users(a)lists.kamailio.org' Subject: /usr/local/sbin/kamdbctl create error Hi all I have specify the wanted db type (DBENGINE=MYSQL) in the /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamctlrc then I using "/usr/local/sbin/kamdbctl create" to create MySQL database, but I got this error: ERROR: database engine not specified, please setup one in the config script root@acer:/usr/local/src/kamailio-1.5.0/sip-server# vim /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamctlrc root@acer:/usr/local/src/kamailio-1.5.0/sip-server# /usr/local/sbin/kamdbctl create MySQL password for root: INFO: test server charset ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2) ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2) Usage: grep [OPTION]... PATTERN [FILE]... Try `grep --help' for more information. /usr/local/lib/kamailio/kamctl/kamdbctl.mysql: line 112: [: =: unary operator expected INFO: creating database openser ... ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2) ERROR: Creating core database and grant privileges failed! Cheers, vivi

2 1

Hash Table capacity
by Ricardo Martinez 21 Oct '14

21 Oct '14

Hello list. I have a question about the HTABLE module. Suppose that I have a mysql database with 2 million of records. Is possible to load this table as a hash table compatible with Kamailio!? Hope someone can help me. Thanks, Ricardo Martinez.-

6 15

kamailio and app_python
by Victor Seva 11 Jun '14

11 Jun '14

Hi, is there any way to return values from a call to python_exec function orther than the default returned integer? Following code generates this error: Oct 1 09:08:23 zskio /usr/sbin/kamailio[21789]: ERROR: app_python [python_support.c:38]: python_exec2: Unhandled exception in the Python code: Oct 1 09:08:23 zskio /usr/sbin/kamailio[21789]: ERROR: app_python [python_support.c:78]: #011RuntimeError: no such function if (!python_exec("get_provider", $(var(clean_uri){s.prefixes}))) { xlog("L_ERR","Can not choose a provider for $rU\n"); sl_send_reply("503","Can not choose a provider for $rU"); exit; } def get_provider(self, msg, param): # snipped code... result = self.util.get_provider(prefixes, position, mode) if result is not None: LM_ERR("mode: %s position: %d result: %s" % (mode, position, result)) # this raises error msg.call_function('rewritehost', result['provider']['ip']) return 1 return -1 I tried to use headers as transport but this simple code does not work: Oct 1 09:45:31 zskio /usr/sbin/kamailio[22303]: ERROR: <script>: No header if (!is_present_hf("X-Test-header")) { xlog("L_ERROR", "No header\n"); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "Header added\n"); } def test_set_header(self, msg): msg.call_function('append_hf', 'X-Test-header: test\r\n') return 1 Thanks in advance.

4 6

TLS and SIP
by Fabian Borot 23 May '14

23 May '14

Hi I am using Kamailio 4.0.1 in front of an asterisk servers farm to handle TLS with our clients and providers. The idea is to have kamailio "talking" SIP/UDP/5060 and TLS/TCP/5061 with the customers and providers and regular SIP/UDP/5060 with our internal asterisk servers. So far at least for the customers it looks like it can work. But I have a problem, when the call is established and the called person hangs up, the BYE from the called person to the calling person is ignored. Only when the calling person hangs up first the call is terminated properly. This is what I have been able to see: 1- Customer starts the TLS handshake/connection. 2- Kamailio authenticate it, then routes the call to the asterisk server using regular SIP/UDP/5060 but I see that it is inserting 2 Record Routes in the INVITE: Record-Route: <sip:192.168.1.58;r2=on;lr=on> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.1.58:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;lr=on> 3- The Contact on that INVITE to the asterisk also comes like this: Contact: <sip:94167032@172.31.196.21:53325;transport=tls> 4- The ACK sent to the asterisk once it accepts the call (200 OK) also has those 2 Record-Routes: Record-Route: <sip:192.168.1.58;r2=on;lr=on> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.1.58:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;lr=on> 5- The call is established, once the called person decides to hang up the BYE looks like this: BYE sip:94167032@172.31.196.21:53325;transport=tls SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.59:5060;branch=z9hG4bK40fa1c23;rport Route: <sip:192.168.1.58;r2=on;lr=on>,<sip:192.168.1.58:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;lr=on> Max-Forwards: 70 From: <sip:3030500@1.2.3.4>;tag=as37953869 To: "kamailio" <sip:kamailio@1.2.3.4>;tag=788cd7c892df40f3b1967112395e2ca4 Call-ID: f9fe65daf1074219be26cb0c224339f1 CSeq: 102 BYE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX 11.3.0 X-Asterisk-HangupCause: Normal Clearing X-Asterisk-HangupCauseCode: 16 Content-Length: 0 My kamailio TLS config is shown below: enable_tls=yes loadmodule "tls.so" # ----- tls params ----- modparam("tls", "config", "/usr/local/kamailio-4.1//etc/kamailio/tls.cfg") modparam("tls", "private_key", "./privkey.pem") modparam("tls", "certificate", "./kamailio1_cert.pem") modparam("tls", "ca_list", "./calist.pem") modparam("tls", "verify_certificate", 1) modparam("tls", "require_certificate", 1) The TLS client that I am using is called Blink.At this point I don't know whether kamailio is sending the BYE using TLS to the customer and waiting for the 200 OK from the customer or whether kamailio does not like something in the BYE and that is why is ignoring it. I see some encrypted packets from kamailio to the client but I don't know what is inside. Any help would be very appreciated. thank you fabian

7 14

Double attempt to record-route
by Juha Heinanen 27 Apr '14

27 Apr '14

I tried to call record_route_preset() in branch route in order to add contact specific RR headers when request is forked to more than one contact. What happened was that I got error message: Sep 26 17:03:47 wheezy2 /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[2436]: ERROR: rr [rr_mod.c:256]: Duble attempt to record-route Is it really so that record routing is not a branch specific thing? Is there a way to solve this problem? -- Juha

3 4

PERMISSIONS module issue
by Samuel Ware 15 Apr '14

15 Apr '14

I having issue updating my allow list for the PERMISSIONS module. I added an address to the ADDRESS table. I have tried to do a service restart, kamctl address reload, and kamcmd permissions.addressReload. The kamctl address show displays the new address; however kamcmd permissions.addressDump does not neither does kamcmd permissions.subnetDump. The messages from this new address return a false to the !allow_source_address("1”) command in my routing logic. I am wondering if this is a bug or I am doing something wrong. I am on the most recent GIT version to the best of my knowledge. Sam

6 6

kamailio with mediaproxy-ng, 488 Not Acceptable Here
by Mihai Marin 26 Feb '14

26 Feb '14

Hello Sirs, I have a problem configuring kamailio with mediaproxy-ng and I'm asking for help. I managed to build everything, kamailio find support for mediaproxy-ng using rtpproxy-ng. When I'm trying to make a call from Web using my phone's internet provider to my computer's web I get 488 Not Acceptable Here. Swithing the caller I get no video. I have used the kamailio-advanced.cfg generated and added websocket support. The call in my network is working perfect. Can you help me with this? mediaproxy-ng log: mediaproxy-ng[14896]: Returning to SIP proxy: d7:createdi1390864117e7:streamslld3:tag10:trhh9viigs6:status34:known but unconfirmed peer address5:statsd3:rtpd8:countersd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0ee12:peer addressd6:family4:IPv47:address13:213.233.85.554:porti48279ee23:advertised peer addressd6:family4:IPv47:address13:213.233.85.554:porti48279ee10:local porti30008ee4:rtcpd8:countersd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0ee12:peer addressd6:family4:IPv47:address13:213.233.85.554:porti48280ee23:advertised peer addressd6:family4:IPv47:address13:213.233.85.554:porti48280ee10:local porti30009eeeed3:tag0:6:status20:unknown peer address5:statsd3:rtpd8:countersd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0ee12:peer addressd6:family4:IPv67:address2:::4:porti0ee23:advertised peer addressd6:family4:IPv67:address2:::4:porti0ee10:local porti30010ee4:rtcpd8:countersd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0ee12:peer addressd6:family4:IPv67:address2:::4:porti0ee23:advertised peer addressd6:family4:IPv67:address2:::4:porti0ee10:local porti30011eeeeee6:totalsd5:inputd3:rtpd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0ee4:rtcpd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0eee6:outputd3:rtpd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0ee4:rtcpd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0eeee6:result2:oke kamailio: 11(14926) ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-advanced.cfg] l=860 a=24 n=rtpproxy_manage 11(14926) DEBUG: rtpproxy-ng [rtpproxy.c:1333]: rtpp_function_call(): proxy reply: d7:createdi1390864117e7:streamslld3:tag10:trhh9viigs6:status34:known but unconfirmed peer address5:statsd3:rtpd8:countersd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0ee12:peer addressd6:family4:IPv47:address13:213.233.85.554:porti48279ee23:advertised peer addressd6:family4:IPv47:address13:213.233.85.554:porti48279ee10:local porti30008ee4:rtcpd8:countersd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0ee12:peer addressd6:family4:IPv47:address13:213.233.85.554:porti48280ee23:advertised peer addressd6:family4:IPv47:address13:213.233.85.554:porti48280ee10:local porti30009eeeed3:tag0:6:status20:unknown peer address5:statsd3:rtpd8:countersd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0ee12:peer addressd6:family4:IPv67:address2:::4:porti0ee23:advertised peer addressd6:family4:IPv67:address2:::4:porti0ee10:local porti30010ee4:rtcpd8:countersd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0ee12:peer addressd6:family4:IPv67:address2:::4:porti0ee23:advertised peer addressd6:family4:IPv67:address2:::4:porti0ee10:local porti30011eeeeee6:totalsd5:inputd3:rtpd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0ee4:rtcpd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0eee6:outputd3:rtpd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0ee4:rtcpd7:packetsi0e5:bytesi0e6:errorsi0eeee6:result2:oke 11(14926) ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-advanced.cfg] l=867 a=16 n=if 11(14926) ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-advanced.cfg] l=862 a=24 n=is_request 11(14926) ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-advanced.cfg] l=866 a=16 n=if 11(14926) ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-advanced.cfg] l=863 a=24 n=has_totag 11(14926) DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:103]: has_totag(): no totag 11(14926) ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-advanced.cfg] l=864 a=25 n=add_rr_param 11(14926) ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-advanced.cfg] l=873 a=16 n=if 11(14926) ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-advanced.cfg] l=867 a=24 n=is_reply 11(14926) ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-advanced.cfg] l=873 a=2 n=return 11(14926) ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-advanced.cfg] l=1009 a=16 n=if 11(14926) ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-advanced.cfg] l=989 a=24 n=t_is_canceled 11(14926) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1071]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global id=2 T start=0x7f62174df4e0 11(14926) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1143]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: T already found! 11(14926) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1827]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 11(14926) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2007]: generate_res_buf_from_sip_res(): old size: 397, new size: 305 11(14926) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2025]: generate_res_buf_from_sip_res(): copied size: orig:125, new: 33, rest: 272 msg= SIP/2.0 488 Not Acceptable Here Via: SIP/2.0/WS ebhg3v0qb6fm.invalid;rport=1034;received=213.233.85.55;branch=z9hG4bK8048296 To: <sip:bob@93.187.138.214>;tag=r6dc2287g9 From: "Alice Test" <sip:alice@93.187.138.214>;tag=trhh9viigs Call-ID: fvgga4ikm8vrvuji0g0n CSeq: 6228 INVITE Content-Length: 0 11(14926) DEBUG: websocket [ws_frame.c:713]: ws_frame_transmit(): Tx message: SIP/2.0 488 Not Acceptable Here Via: SIP/2.0/WS ebhg3v0qb6fm.invalid;rport=1034;received=213.233.85.55;branch=z9hG4bK8048296 To: <sip:bob@93.187.138.214>;tag=r6dc2287g9 From: "Alice Test" <sip:alice@93.187.138.214>;tag=trhh9viigs Call-ID: fvgga4ikm8vrvuji0g0n CSeq: 6228 INVITE Content-Length: 0 Thank you. Best regards, Mihai M

8 27

Call Control for Credit and Rate
by Raj Roy Ghandhi 21 Feb '14

21 Feb '14

Hi, I want to implement the call control by 1. Validating the CLI and get the credit from DB 2. Check the Rate for the dialed number 3. set the call timeout for the call duration. ( credit/rate) 4. pass the call to remote PSTN GW Please guide me on this. Regards, Roy.

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users January 2014