sr-users February 2015

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

95 participants
131 discussions

[Kamailio 4.0.6] sometimes route specified by RTIMER module doesn't be executed just after finishing starting Kamailio server
by jack wang 11 Feb '15

11 Feb '15

Hello everyone, I got a little trouble on using the RTIMER module. Sometimes the route block I set using the "exec" parameter in RTIMER module doesn't be executed, this will happen from Kamailio server being started, and only work (not always) after restarting server. I have no idea why this happen, does anyone ever met this? Which part should I notice? Thx :)

1 0

Presence module for BLF issue
by SamyGo 11 Feb '15

11 Feb '15

Hi community, I'm dealing with a problem here related to presence module handling BLF. My BLF phones are Yealink T28p with latest firmware and work perfectly with Asterisk and FreeSwitch but not with Kamailio as expected. What I'm observing here is a malfunctioning statuses due to accumulation of multiple entries of just one status in "presentitiy" table. These entries neither get expired not cleared from DB hence I see atleast 21 XML tags combined in the NOTIFY sent to Phones. Here is what I've figured out a manual way to make the BLF work fine again. *Step -1* Make call between two endpoints. see entries in presentitiy table showing up. *Step -2* NOTIFYs sent to phones subscribing those users from Kamailio and phones show correct flashing red BLF lights *Step -3* clear the entries from presentity table manually i.e mysql> truncate presentity; *Step -4* Hangup the phones, presentity table shows few more entries with state='terminated' NOTIFY sent again to subscribers.. BLF lighst turn green happily. Here are my module params: modparam("presence", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("presence", "notifier_processes", 1) modparam("presence", "server_address", "sip:1.2.5.5" ) modparam("presence", "send_fast_notify", 0) modparam("presence", "db_update_period", 1) modparam("presence", "clean_period", 4) modparam("presence", "subs_db_mode", 2) modparam("presence", "max_expires", 36) modparam("presence", "expires_offset", 10) modparam("presence", "subs_htable_size", 12) modparam("presence", "pres_htable_size", 12) modparam("presence", "fetch_rows", 1000) (these params were set as default earlier but I changed them as above hoping they'll help) Kindly share your expert opinion. Best Regards, Sammy

2 10

Issues while using Kamailio as proxy with Asterisk
by Juned Khan 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Hi All, I am using Kamailio as proxy server with Asterisk but having some issues with Inbound and outbound calls. Asterisk is a registrar, Kamailio is a just for proxy. Using softphone call are working fine but using hardphone, its creating issues. Here are the test cases. No Test case *98 Inbound 1 ATA registered with Proxy Domain No No 2 ATA registered with Proxy IP Yes Yes 3 ATA registered with Asterisk domain No No 4 ATA registered with Asterisk IP Yes Yes 5 Soft phone registered with Proxy Domain Yes Yes 6 Soft phone registered with Proxy IP Yes Yes 7 Soft phone registered with Asterisk domain Yes Yes 8 Soft phone registered with Asterisk IP Yes Yes Here I am dialling *98 with the mentioned scenario, if it goes to voicemail options then Yes, else No I am using ALLO ATA. Here is my Kamailio.cfg http://pastie.org/9887806 Regards Juned Khan / Network Engineer +91 9974740823/ juned.khan(a)inextrix.com iNextrix Technologies Pvt Ltd. www.inextrix.com <http://htmlsig.com/www.inextrix.com> [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/junedkhan23> [image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/juned23> [image: Google Plus] <https://plus.google.com/+JunedKhan> [image: Linkedin] <http://htmlsig.com/in.linkedin.com/in/junedk> This e-mail message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is prohibited. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates with us by e-mail is deemed to have accepted these risks. Company Name is not responsible for errors or omissions in this message and denies any responsibility for any damage arising from the use of e-mail. Any opinion and other statement contained in this message and any attachment are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.

2 1

Kamailio v4.2.3 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v4.2.3 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the latest stable branch, 4.2, that includes fixes since release of v4.2.2. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on installations of v4.2.x. Deployments running previous v4.x.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v4.2.3. For more details about version 4.2.3 (including links and guidelines to download the tarball or from GIT repository), visit: * http://www.kamailio.org/w/2015/02/kamailio-v4-2-3-released/ RPM, Debian/Ubuntu packages will be available soon as well. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong location entries when using usrloc with Mongo
by Mickael Marrache 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

I forgot to precise that I allow only one contact per AOR. modparam("registrar", "max_contacts", 1) save("location", "0x04") From: Mickael Marrache [mailto:mickaelmarrache@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 10:51 AM To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Subject: Wrong location entries when using usrloc with Mongo Hi, I start with no location nor in Mongo, nor in memory. My UA registers successfully and I can see the location entry in Mongo. Then, I close my UA which unregisters (by setting Expires header to 0). Then, I open the app again and a new registration is made. The entry after first registration. Looks okay. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "username" : "A", "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp", "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:55:34Z"), "q" : -1, "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "cseq" : 8809, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip:XXXXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip:XXXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip:XXXXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp:XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:55:34Z"), "ruid" : "uloc-54cb38df-3378-2", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0 } The same entry after un register (Expires 0). Note that the username field is missing. In any case, I expected the entry to be deleted. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:56:51Z"), "q" : -1, "cseq" : 8811, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:56:51Z"), "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0, "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp" } The entries after second registration. The new entry looks okay. But, the old entry is still here. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:56:51Z"), "q" : -1, "cseq" : 8811, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:56:51Z"), "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0, "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp" } { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb3a7884e581337a25b895"), "username" : "A", "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp", "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T09:02:00Z"), "q" : -1, "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "cseq" : 8813, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:02:00Z"), "ruid" : "uloc-54cb38df-337a-1", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0 } The issue is the entry is not deleted after un registering. I precise that registrations are dispatched over multiple registrars with all accesses the same Mongo cluster. Thanks, Mickael

2 7

Kamailio appends firs inserted branch twice
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Hello I use this version of kamailio kamailio -v version: kamailio 4.3.0-dev3 (x86_64/linux) 8cdbe7 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, DBG_F_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 8cdbe7 compiled on 17:54:50 Jan 20 2015 with gcc 4.8.2 I hav an issue with append branches to branch route when I need fork call to one endpoint woth different destionations. I use my own algorithm for call to this devices because with lookup("location") I can not use RTPENGINE for different types of endpoints (web endoints and standart UDP endpoints) My alg is here: { sql_query("ca", "select contact from location where username='$tU'", "ra"); xlog("L_INFO","rows: $dbr(ra=>rows) cols: $dbr(ra=>cols)\n"); if($dbr(ra=>rows)>0){ $var(i)=0; while($var(i)<$dbr(ra=>rows)){ xlog("L_INFO","SQL query return contact {$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])} for {$tU} at step {$var(i)}\n"); if ($dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])=~"transport=ws"){ xlog("L_INFO", "This is a Websocket call to endpoint"); sql_pvquery("ca", "select received from location where contact='$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])'","$var(recieved)"); $du=$var(recieved); xlog("L_INFO","SQL query return recieved {$var(recieved)} for {$tU}. Destination is {$du}\n"); append_branch("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})"); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "This is a classic UDP call to endpoint"); $var(recieved)=''; sql_pvquery("ca", "select received from location where contact='$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])'","$var(recieved)"); xlog("L_INFO", "SQL query return RECIEVED {$var(recieved)}"); if ($var(recieved)==0){ xlog("L_INFO", "Recieved string is EMPTY"); $du="sip:"+$(dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0]){s.select,1,@}); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "Recieved string is {$var(recieved)}"); $du=$var(recieved); } $var(UDP_contact)="sip:"+$(dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0]){s.select,1,@}); append_branch("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})"); xlog("L_INFO","Classic Destination URI is {$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])} for {$tU}}. Destination is {$du}\n"); } $var(i) = $var(i) + 1; } } else{ exit; } t_on_branch("1"); return; } } } branch_route[1]{ if($du=~"transport=ws"){ xlog("L_INFO","Websocket Branch is {$du} for {$tU}\n"); rtpengine_manage("internal extenal force trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF"); t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS"); } else{ xlog("L_INFO","UDP Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n"); rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove RTP/AVP"); t_on_reply("MANAGE_CLASSIC_REPLY"); } } So as you see I choose array of devices and then set its to branches. At the kamailio console I see output This is output of alg that above. I have 3 devices: 2 websocket devices and 1 udp But when you look at dump where rtpengine make changes with packets you can see that it runs for 4 devices and 1 and 4 devices is the same. You can see start of every branch from words of log "Websocket Branch is" or "UDP Branch is" So this bug gives a mistake because some of hardphones can not handlie double INVITE and kamilio response for this devices cancel with 200 cause because hardphone set 482 reply to kamialio. (you can see it reply at the log) Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: rows: 3 cols: 1 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return contact {sip:5ue13vsh@2t4iielj109h.invalid;transport=ws} for {123455678} at step {0} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: This is a Websocket call to endpoint Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return recieved {sip:85.6.14.8:4328;transport=WS} for {123455678}. Destination is {sip:85.6.14.8:4328;transport=WS} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return contact {sip:a7uo9vsq@7c0oo5kvc71e.invalid;transport=ws} for {123455678} at step {1} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: This is a Websocket call to endpoint Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return recieved {sip:85.2.10.3:58509;transport=WS} for {123455678}. Destination is {sip:85.2.10.3:58509;transport=WS} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return contact {sip:upsjchv2@5c88tisd29d4.invalid;transport=ws} for {123455678} at step {2} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: This is a Websocket call to endpoint Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return recieved {sip:18.9.18.10:56917;transport=WS} for {123455678}. Destination is {sip:18.9.18.10:56917;transport=WS} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: Websocket Branch is {sip:18.9.18.10:56917;transport=WS} for {123455678} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:52689: offer - { "sdp": "v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 12230 RTP/AVP 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012", "ICE": "force", "direction": [ "internal" ], "flags": [ "extenal", "force", "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: ... "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/SAVPF", "call-id": "220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600", "received-from": [ "IP4", "12.34.56.78" ], "from-tag": "as4f0c032f", "command": "offer" } Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'extenal' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'force' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Creating new call Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp747:v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012t=0 0#015#012a=ice-lite#015#012m=audio 38518 RTP/SAVPF 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=rtcp:38519#015#012a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:f31jYQjjKBdYoqWYijx0V/ZtTfP17pTVW8NJGVQ4#015#012a=setup:actpass#015#012a=fingerprint:sh ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] ... a-1 00:E3:0F:B6:C0:9F:D4:16:52:D2:41:A8:01:24:51:CD:3F:FB:B2:55#015#012a=ice-ufrag:VfqUSGBP#015#012a=ice-pwd:t5bLzDaNcqWUwzh7iEtyAZfweGo6#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 1 UDP 2130706431 23.101.139.216 38518 typ host#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 2 UDP 2130706430 23.101.139.216 38519 typ host#015#0126:result2:oke Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: Websocket Branch is {sip:85.6.14.8:4328;transport=WS} for {123455678} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:52689: offer - { "sdp": "v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 12230 RTP/AVP 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012", "ICE": "force", "direction": [ "internal" ], "flags": [ "extenal", "force", "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: ... "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/SAVPF", "call-id": "220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600", "received-from": [ "IP4", "12.34.56.78" ], "from-tag": "as4f0c032f", "command": "offer" } Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'extenal' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'force' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp747:v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012t=0 0#015#012a=ice-lite#015#012m=audio 38518 RTP/SAVPF 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=rtcp:38519#015#012a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:f31jYQjjKBdYoqWYijx0V/ZtTfP17pTVW8NJGVQ4#015#012a=setup:actpass#015#012a=fingerprint:sh ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] ... a-1 00:E3:0F:B6:C0:9F:D4:16:52:D2:41:A8:01:24:51:CD:3F:FB:B2:55#015#012a=ice-ufrag:VfqUSGBP#015#012a=ice-pwd:t5bLzDaNcqWUwzh7iEtyAZfweGo6#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 1 UDP 2130706431 23.101.139.216 38518 typ host#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 2 UDP 2130706430 23.101.139.216 38519 typ host#015#0126:result2:oke Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: Websocket Branch is {sip:85.2.10.3:58509;transport=WS} for {123455678} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:52689: offer - { "sdp": "v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 12230 RTP/AVP 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012", "ICE": "force", "direction": [ "internal" ], "flags": [ "extenal", "force", "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: ... "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/SAVPF", "call-id": "220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600", "received-from": [ "IP4", "12.34.56.78" ], "from-tag": "as4f0c032f", "command": "offer" } Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'extenal' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'force' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp747:v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012t=0 0#015#012a=ice-lite#015#012m=audio 38518 RTP/SAVPF 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=rtcp:38519#015#012a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:f31jYQjjKBdYoqWYijx0V/ZtTfP17pTVW8NJGVQ4#015#012a=setup:actpass#015#012a=fingerprint:sh ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] ... a-1 00:E3:0F:B6:C0:9F:D4:16:52:D2:41:A8:01:24:51:CD:3F:FB:B2:55#015#012a=ice-ufrag:VfqUSGBP#015#012a=ice-pwd:t5bLzDaNcqWUwzh7iEtyAZfweGo6#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 1 UDP 2130706431 23.101.139.216 38518 typ host#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 2 UDP 2130706430 23.101.139.216 38519 typ host#015#0126:result2:oke Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: Websocket Branch is {sip:18.9.18.10:56917;transport=WS} for {123455678} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:52689: offer - { "sdp": "v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 12230 RTP/AVP 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012", "ICE": "force", "direction": [ "internal" ], "flags": [ "extenal", "force", "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: ... "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/SAVPF", "call-id": "220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600", "received-from": [ "IP4", "12.34.56.78" ], "from-tag": "as4f0c032f", "command": "offer" } Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'extenal' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'force' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp747:v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012t=0 0#015#012a=ice-lite#015#012m=audio 38518 RTP/SAVPF 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=rtcp:38519#015#012a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:f31jYQjjKBdYoqWYijx0V/ZtTfP17pTVW8NJGVQ4#015#012a=setup:actpass#015#012a=fingerprint:sh ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] ... a-1 00:E3:0F:B6:C0:9F:D4:16:52:D2:41:A8:01:24:51:CD:3F:FB:B2:55#015#012a=ice-ufrag:VfqUSGBP#015#012a=ice-pwd:t5bLzDaNcqWUwzh7iEtyAZfweGo6#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 1 UDP 2130706431 23.101.139.216 38518 typ host#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 2 UDP 2130706430 23.101.139.216 38519 typ host#015#0126:result2:oke Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 100 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Manage_Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 100 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 180 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Manage_Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 180 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 482 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59442]: INFO: <script>: Reply from webrtc client {85.2.10.3:58509} for method {INVITE}: 100 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59442]: INFO: <script>: Manage_Reply from webrtc client {85.2.10.3:58509} for method {INVITE}: 100

2 3

Setting dialog variable when BYE is received before accounting
by Mickael Marrache 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Hi, Is there a way to set a dialog variable when a BYE is received so that it can be written in a CDR? I tried as follows but it didn't work: if (loose_route()) { .. if(is_method("BYE")) { if(is_direction("downstream")) { #Call disconnected by caller $dlg_var(dr) = 700; } else { #Call disconnected by callee $dlg_var(dr) = 701; } xlog("Setting disconnect reason to $dlg_var(dr)\n"); } .. exit; } The xlog statement prints: ERROR: <script>: Setting disconnect reason to <null> The doc states: This pseudo-variable will be available only for subsequential requests after doing loose_route(). Thanks, Mickael

2 1

Planing to release Kamailio v4.2.3
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Hello, I am planning to release a new version from latest stable branch - 4.2. Most likely it will be Tuesday next week (Feb 10). If there is something important to take in consideration for this version, reply to sr-dev mailing list. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

2 4

Facing kamailio issue
by taha zafar 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Dear Kamailo team, I am facing problem in connecting kamailio on TLS, even kamailio is listening perfectly. TLS certificate are also tested. Kindly find attached logs and kamailio configuration file and give me your valuable feedback. *Eocean Pvt. Ltd.* *Taha Zafar* VoIP Engineer Mobile: 03318244432 Disclaimer: This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Eocean (Pvt) Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.

2 1

Parallel call forward
by Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

Hi all, I'm getting crazy trying to setup a kamailio to do a parallel call forward to multiple destinations based on a query to the DB. I do the db query and get the RURI's of the destinations I could forward the call to in parallel, then when I get the resulset I do: [...] $var(cf_idx) = 0; while(is_avp_set("$(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0])")) { $ru = $(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0]); # Set the new RURI to call to $(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0]) = $null; # Setting it to $null pull the value from the stack $(avp(s:callee_fr_inv_timer)[*]) = $(avp(s:cf_timeouts)[0]) * 1000; t_set_fr("$avp(s:callee_fr_inv_timer)"); $(avp(s:cf_timeouts)[0]) = $null; route(ROUTE_ACC_CF); # Do the ACC $(avp(s:acc_state)[*]) = "cfna"; $(avp(s:hih_cause)[*]) = "404"; $var(cf_idx) = $var(cf_idx) + 1; append_branch(); } route(ROUTE_EXECUTE_CF_LOOP); # Some final task and then t_relay [...] But only the last RURI get called How do I do to accomplish this? ... I need to change the $ru of each new branch, so when request get loop-back to the proxy, it do again all the lookup logic. Best regards

2 6

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users February 2015