sr-users October 2019

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

59 participants
87 discussions

Kamailio OPTIONS Round-Trip
by Soltanici Ilie 27 Mar '20

27 Mar '20

Hi, With Asterisk, we are able to get some peer round-trip connection statistic by setting qualify=yes for the specified peer. It sends periodic OPTIONS to the peer and calculates the time round trip time. It's something like - "Status: OK (30 ms)". Is there any way to achieve this in Kamailio by using nathelper module, or any other? Thank you.

9 13

Kamailio stop to process incoming SIP traffic via TCP.
by Kristijan Vrban 16 Jan '20

16 Jan '20

Hi kamailios, i have a creepy situation with v5.2.1 stable Kamilio. After a day or so, Kamailio stop to process incoming SIP traffic via TCP. The incoming TCP network packages get TCP-ACK from the OS (Debian 9, 4.18.0-15-generic-Linux) but Kamailio does not show any processing for the SIP-Traffic incoming via TCP. No logs, nothing. While traffic via UDP is working just totally fine. When i look via command "netstat -ntp" is see, that the Recv-Q get bigger and bigger. e.g.: Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name tcp 4566 0 172.17.217.12:5060 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:57252 ESTABLISHED 31347/kamailio After Kamailio restart, all is working fine again for a day. We have maybe 10-20 devices online via TCP and low call volume (1-2 call per minute). The only settings for tcp we have is "tcp_delayed_ack=no" How to could we debug this situation? Again, no error, no warings in the log. Just nothing. Kristijan

11 46

WebRTC ACK Protocol
by Ilie Soltanici 08 Jan '20

08 Jan '20

Hello, I am trying to set up a WebRTC2SIP Gateway by using Kamailio and rtpengine. So far, everything is working fine, I'm able to register an extension and make a call, but for some reason, when i'm trying to call a WebRTC extension from any SIP Extension Kamailio is sending INVITE, WebRTC extension is sending back 200 OK, and then Kamailio is trying to send an ACK through UDP protocol, and not through wss, as it's supposed to do. This is how invite is looking: INVITE sip:nl7oe4ss@vjbh7r4im6j7.invalid;transport=wss SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:my-company.net ;transport=udp;ftag=as1789445c;lr=on;nat=yes> Via: SIP/2.0/WSS 123.123.123.123:10443 ;branch=z9hG4bKe655.29d7c135a302f3eb803902d4f5a8da7e.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.50.237:5060 ;received=192.168.50.237;branch=z9hG4bK7d2e534e;rport=5060 Max-Forwards: 70 From: "WebRTC" <sip:11@my-company.net>;tag=as1789445c To: <sip:15@192.168.50.210:5060> Contact: <sip:11@192.168.50.237:5060> Call-ID: 7fc800de060197fa2315c93763873092(a)my-company.net CSeq: 102 INVITE User-Agent: Proxy Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 17:11:41 GMT Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Alert-Info: Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 596 Server: SIP Proxy and then WebRTC app is replying with 200 OK: SIP/2.0 200 OK Record-Route: <sip:my-company.net ;transport=udp;ftag=as1789445c;lr=on;nat=yes> Via: SIP/2.0/WSS 123.123.123.123:10443 ;branch=z9hG4bKe655.29d7c135a302f3eb803902d4f5a8da7e.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.50.237:5060 ;received=192.168.50.237;branch=z9hG4bK7d2e534e;rport=5060 To: <sip:15@192.168.50.210:5060>;tag=dk4fa8ftt6 From: "WebRTC" <sip:11@my-company.net>;tag=as1789445c Call-ID: 7fc800de060197fa2315c93763873092(a)my-company.net CSeq: 102 INVITE Contact: <sip:nl7oe4ss@vjbh7r4im6j7.invalid;transport=wss> Allow: ACK,CANCEL,INVITE,MESSAGE,BYE,OPTIONS,INFO,NOTIFY,REFER Supported: outbound User-Agent: Proxy-WEBRTC Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 901 and finally, Kamailio is trying to send this ack through UDP protocol: ACK sip:nl7oe4ss@22.22.22.22:57421;transport=wss SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.50.237:5060;branch=z9hG4bK56363ddf;rport Route: <sip:my-company.net;transport=udp;ftag=as1789445c;lr=on;nat=yes> Max-Forwards: 70 From: "WebRTC" <sip:11@my-company.net>;tag=as1789445c To: <sip:15@192.168.50.210:5060>;tag=dk4fa8ftt6 Contact: <sip:11@192.168.50.237:5060> Call-ID: 7fc800de060197fa2315c93763873092(a)my-company.net CSeq: 102 ACK User-Agent: Proxy Content-Length: 0 If i'm trying to force it through TLS, i'm receiving error: get_send_socket2(): protocol/port mismatch (forced tls:123.123.123.123:10443, to udp:22.22.22.22:23317) Can someone point me in the right direction, please? Thank you.

3 4

rtpproxy does not response, disable it
by Zodiac 03 Jan '20

03 Jan '20

Dear friends, I am working on a program on Kamailio and rtpengine proxy. I am wondering whether can I set Kamailio and rtpengine daemon on different physical machines. For example, I set Kamailio on a machine with IP address:10.109.247.80, and launch rtpengine daemon on another machine with interface parameter as 10.109.247.90 and ng port 7723. I set parameter in Kamailio.cfg with modparam(“rtpengine”, “rtpengine_sock”, “udp:10.109.247.90:7723”). Unfortunately I got debug message like this: ERROR: rtpengine [rtpengine.c:1710]: send_rtpp_command(): can't send command to a RTP proxy ERROR: rtpengine [rtpengine.c:1746]: send_rtpp_command(): proxy <udp:10.109.247.90:7723> does not respond, disable it ERROR: rtpengine [rtpengine.c:1616]: rtpp_test(): proxy did not respond to ping And, I also tried to set Kamailio and rtpengine daemon in a same machine,and use modparam(“rtpengine”, “rtpengine_sock”, “udp:localhost:7723”). And Kamailio can work functionally under this situation. rtpengine daemon can receive ping message from Kamailio and rtpengine daemon can work as suspected. So for the later case, is it supposed that Kamailio be in the same machine with same localhost address? Otherwise, what’s the reason for my ERROR? ------------------------------------ 北京邮电大学网络技术研究院网络与交换技术国家重点实验室田军 +86 18810315790 mozillafire(a)bupt.edu.cn ------------------------------------

5 10

lookup(aliases) issues with 5.2
by igor.potjevlesch＠gmail.com 13 Dec '19

13 Dec '19

Hello! I have notice some issues with lookup(aliases) since I upgraded to 5.2 from 5.1: First with kamctl: If this default command is executed: ctl_cmd_run ul.add "$USRLOC_TABLE" "$OSERUSER@$OSERDOMAIN" "$2" \ "$UL_EXPIRES" "$DEFAULT_Q" "$UL_PATH" "$UL_FLAGS" "$BR_FLAGS" "$ALL_METHODS" as $ALL_METHODS is not defined, there is a huge value in methods and then lookup(aliases) fails with -2. I have to update kamctl script and put -1 ("-1") instead of the variable. So, now, methods is a NULL value in DB and my alias is not ignored. But I use to make my alias like this: sip:number@blabla_1.local Which is no longer works: ERROR: registrar [common.c:62]: extract_aor(): failed to parse AoR [sip:number@blabla_1.local] Any idea of the difference since 5.2 with this behaviour? Without the underscore, the AoR seems to be valid but I need to support underscore as before. Regards, Igor.

4 16

Kamailio as SBC for Microsoft Teams
by Henning Westerholt 29 Nov '19

29 Nov '19

Hello, I have created a "How-To" blog post on using Kamailio as "session border controller" for Microsoft Teams Direct Routing: https://skalatan.de/de/blog/kamailio-sbc-teams You can this way use all the existing possibilities that Kamailio provide to interact with MS Teams as well. Best regards, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services

7 10

Re-use TCP connections on different transactions
by Joel Serrano 26 Nov '19

26 Nov '19

Hello, I'm setting up a Kamailio instance behind a TCP load balancer (with proxy protocol and NAT routing: meaning Kam stays in the flow all the time). I've managed to get working almost everything we need for our service, except for one thing, and that is for Kam to use existing connections for subsequent transactions: Following this example: [image: image.png] EXT & INT represent the external and internal interface of a LB between the UAC and Kamailio, using TLS on both legs and proxy protocol. Transaction 1: INVITE, 100, 180, 183, 200 OK UAC 1.1.1.1:1111 -> 2.2.2.2:443 (EXT) 3.3.3.3:3333 (INT) -> 7.7.7.7:5060 (Kamailio) Transaction 2: ACK UAC 1.1.1.1:1112 -> 2.2.2.2:443 (EXT) 4.4.4.4:4444 (INT) -> 7.7.7.7:5060 (Kamailio) Transaction 3: BYE Kam 7.7.7.7:5060 -> 3.3.3.3:3333 (INT) 2.2.2.2:443 (EXT) -> 1.1.1.1:1111 UAC My problem is with Transaction 3. In this case the BYE is originated by the callee, and Kam has to send it to the caller. As the TCP load balancer is between Kam and the UAC, Kam has to send it to the LB so then the LB can forward it back to the UAC. This works well for msgs that belong to the same transaction (INVITE, 100, 180, 183, 200 OK) but it fails when they don't belong to the same transaction. Thanks to the newly added $tcp(c_si) and $tcp(c_sp) pseudovars, I can save the internal IP:Port of the LB, so I can send stuff later to it, my problem is that Kam doesn't seem to allow this? On the original INVITE, I use the following to save where I have to reach the UAC: add_contact_alias("$tcp(c_si)", "$tcp(c_sp)", "tls"); Then, handle_ruri_alias() will take care of setting $du to the correct (internal LB) IP:Port so I can reach the UAC, this works. My problem is that Kamailio doesn't identify that there is a valid existing TLS connection still up (from the INVITE), and tries to create a new one (and this obviously doesn't gives all sorts of problems). So when I run handle_ruri_alias(), and $du is set to 3.3.3.3:3333 (from the example above), instead of using the existing connection, Kamailio tries to create a new one. I have a log statement right before with the result of tcp_conid_state(1) (the connid is 1 for this connection) and the $rc is 1 (Connection is OK), but when I tell Kamailio it has to use it I get this in the logs: DEBUG: {1 11726467 BYE gqR1qqNK8B} <core> [core\/tcp_main.c:2060]: tcp_send(): no open tcp connection found, opening new one"} And then the problems begin... I have tried playing around with: tcp_reuse_port tcp_connection_match But no luck..! I also thought it could be a problem of the connection being created on one worker, and a different worker handling BYE transaction, so tested with children=1 and tcp_children=1, but still same problem. A more detailed log: In blue my log statement checking for the status of conid "1", in red Kam not being able to find it, although it exists (as validated by tcp_conid_state(), and even in netstat I can see the connection established). In this log, 35.191.0.66:60271 would be the equivalent of 3.3.3.3:3333 and 104.175.176.242:28157 would be 1.1.1.1:1111 from the example above. ... "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} <core> [core\/tcp_main.c:1657]: _tcpconn_find(): found connection by id: 1"} "message":" NOTICE: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} <script>: JOEL TEST New request - M=BYE TCP STATUS:1 ID=5-LX4GdI9X"} ... "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} nathelper [nathelper.c:1144]: handle_ruri_alias(): setting dst_uri to <sip:35.191.0.66:60271;transport=tls>"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} nathelper [nathelper.c:1166]: handle_ruri_alias(): rewriting r-uri to <sip:linphone@104.175.176.242:28157;transport=tls>"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} tm [t_lookup.c:1328]: t_newtran(): msg (0x7f3c884259d0) id=534\/18664 global id=532\/18664 T start=0xffffffffffffffff"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} tm [t_lookup.c:497]: t_lookup_request(): start searching: hash=63496, isACK=0"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} tm [t_lookup.c:455]: matching_3261(): RFC3261 transaction matching failed - via branch [z9hG4bK808f.eee2444f92a02cb33e1b7a21f20bc6bb.0]"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} tm [t_lookup.c:675]: t_lookup_request(): no transaction found"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} tm [t_hooks.c:336]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): trans=0x7f3c83b8c598, callback type 1, id 0 entered"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} <core> [core\/crypto\/md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): MD5 calculated: 3071029feb05962b26b53a9664a14210"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} siputils [checks.c:123]: has_totag(): totag found"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} rr [loose.c:1095]: check_route_param(): route params checking against [;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=Eb~TbdfTA;did=cab.01e2;nat=yes] (orig: [r2=on;lr=on;ftag=Eb~TbdfTA;did=cab.01e2;nat=yes])"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} rr [loose.c:1101]: check_route_param(): params are <;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=Eb~TbdfTA;did=cab.01e2;nat=yes>"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} siputils [checks.c:123]: has_totag(): totag found"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} <core> [core\/msg_translator.c:161]: check_via_address(): (198.1.54.228, 198.1.54.228, 0)"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} <core> [core\/tcp_main.c:2060]: tcp_send(): no open tcp connection found, opening new one"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} <core> [core\/ip_addr.c:229]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: 35.191.0.66"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} <core> [core\/tcp_main.c:1242]: tcpconn_new(): on port 60271, type 3"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} <core> [core\/tcp_main.c:1561]: tcpconn_add(): hashes: 1446:2350:0, 5"} "message":" DEBUG: {1 11727734 BYE 5-LX4GdI9X} tls [tls_server.c:199]: tls_complete_init(): completing tls connection initialization"} ... So time to seek help from the community, any suggestions/ideas/comments? Sorry if all this sounds confusing, I've tried my best to put in text the whole scenario in and "understandable" way... Is this even doable? Thanks, Joel.

3 10

Re: [SR-Users] Question on Database Version Table
by JR Richardson 15 Nov '19

15 Nov '19

Yep version_table Set the name of the table holding the table version. Useful if the proxy is sharing a database within a project and during upgrades. Default value is “version”. Example of usage: version_table="version44" That's what I was looking for, perfect! Yes, I added accountcode and notes to my table for internal use, was just making notes on columns I need on the new version upgrade. Thanks. JR On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:17 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > like Alex said, you can have two version tables, one for each versions > of kamailio you play with and use in config the core parameter to set > the name of that table. > > I am actually writing to say that address table never had accountcode > and notes columns. Likely they were added in your deployment for other > purposes or either the default column names were changed. The default > column names are listed at: > > - > https://kamailio.org/docs/db-tables/kamailio-db-5.2.x.html#gen-db-address > > These were the same for rather long time, iirc the recent version number > changed mainly due to with modifications done to the size, not due to > new columns. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 18.06.19 20:50, JR Richardson wrote: > > Hey All, > > > > I'm doing some upgrades and noticed database table version numbers > > have increased. > > > > database table adjustments: > > | address | production ver 3 | upgrade 5.2 ver 6 | need to add > > accountcode and notes column > > | dispatcher | production ver 3 | upgrade 5.2 ver 4 | need to add attr column > > | trusted | production ver 5 | upgrade 5.2 ver 6 | need to add > > ruri_pattern and priority column > > > > I run mysql master/slave so I'm concerned about the master database > > not having the correct version numbers or can I just update the > > version number in the table when I do the upgrade of the kamailio > > versions? > > > > Thanks. > > > > JR

4 6

Re-invite after RTPengine pacemaker switching?
by Жан Базаров 07 Nov '19

07 Nov '19

I need to send re-invite after pacemaker fails over on new rtpengine server. Because new rtpengine dont participate in DTLS handshake and i hear nothing, but silence. I think, may me its would be work. Do you have any idea on this issue?

3 5

$jsonrpl(body) empty or malfunctioned during higher traffic
by Michal Škuta 05 Nov '19

05 Nov '19

Hello, Kamailio community, we are implementing evapi communication to our Kamailio server. We have implemented and tested it on our testing server. Everything was working OK. Now we are testing it on our production servers with a lot more calls and we have some problems here. Every n seconds we are requesting from Kamailio list of all dialogs. And this list of dialogs (from jsonrpc *dlg.list*) is sent to evapi connection. Here is a snippet of our *Kamailio code*: route[CGR_DLG_LIST] { xlog("L_INFO", "XLOG: $ci [CGR_DLG_LIST] Requested dialog list"); # CGRateS connection is still alive, set check to true $sht(cgrconn=>check) = 1; if $sht(cgrconn=>cgr) == $null { sl_send_reply("503","Charging controller unreachable"); exit; } jsonrpc_exec('{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1, "method":"dlg.list","params":[]}'); xlog("L_INFO", "XLOG: $ci [CGR_DLG_LIST] Test1: $jsonrpl(body)"); evapi_relay("{\"event\":\"CGR_DLG_LIST_REPLY\", \"jsonrpl_body\":$jsonrpl(body)}"); } During a higher number of calls Kamailio is generating ERROR messages from evapi module. Here is the syslog: Oct 30 12:02:15 kam-prod /opt/ipgate/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[19512]: INFO: <script>: XLOG: 123 [CGR_DLG_LIST] Requested dialog list Oct 30 12:02:15 kam-prod /opt/ipgate/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[19512]: INFO: <script>: Oct 30 12:02:15 kam-prod /opt/ipgate/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[19512]: DEBUG: evapi [evapi_dispatch.c:740]: _evapi_relay(): relaying event data [ Oct 30 12:02:15 kam-prod /opt/ipgate/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[19512]: ERROR: evapi [evapi_dispatch.c:764]: _evapi_relay(): cannot serialize event Oct 30 12:02:15 kam-prod /opt/ipgate/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[19512]: ERROR: evapi [evapi_mod.c:265]: w_evapi_relay(): failed to relay event: *We are expecting something like this when nobody is calling* Oct 30 14:12:22 kam-test /opt/ipgate/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[32090]: INFO: <script>: XLOG: 123 [CGR_DLG_LIST] Requested dialog list Oct 30 14:12:22 kam-test /opt/ipgate/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[32090]: INFO: <script>: XLOG: 123 [CGR_DLG_LIST] Test1: { #011"jsonrpc":#011"2.0", #011"result":#011[], #011"id":#0111 } Oct 30 14:12:22 kam-test /opt/ipgate/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[32090]: DEBUG: evapi [evapi_dispatch.c:740]: _evapi_relay(): relaying event data [{"event":"CGR_DLG_LIST_REPLY", #011#011#011"jsonrpl_body":{ #011"jsonrpc":#011"2.0", #011"result":#011[], #011"id":#0111 }}] (96) Oct 30 14:12:22 kam-test /opt/ipgate/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[32090]: DEBUG: evapi [evapi_dispatch.c:778]: _evapi_relay(): sending [0x169ff674] [96:{"event":"CGR_DLG_LIST_REPLY", #011#011#011"jsonrpl_body":{ #011"jsonrpc":#011"2.0", #011"result":#011[], #011"id":#0111 }},] (100) Oct 30 14:12:22 kam-test /opt/ipgate/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[32090]: DEBUG: evapi [evapi_dispatch.c:789]: _evapi_relay(): dispatching [0x169ff674] [96:{"event":"CGR_DLG_LIST_REPLY", #011#011#011"jsonrpl_body":{ #011"jsonrpc":#011"2.0", #011"result":#011[], #011"id":#0111 }},] (100) We enabled debug messages for module evapi and are trying to understand where is the problem. To make this work to this state we needed to increase the *pv_buffer* to really big size (2097152). It looks like $jsonrpl(body) is not ready and everything concated with it is not working. Any help or suggestion is welcomed. Sincerely Michal

3 6

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Older →

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users October 2019