sr-users October 2019

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

59 participants
87 discussions

Module acc - How to get sip_reason/code on log_write_cdr() messages
by David VILLAUME 05 Nov '19

05 Nov '19

Hello, I'm trying to get the reason in my cdrs in log_write_cdr() messages while I see It in acc_log_request() messages. Is there a way to retrieve it in log_write_cdr() messages ? Bellow is my config : modparam("acc", "log_level", 1) modparam("acc", "log_facility", "LOG_LOCAL3") modparam("acc", "cdr_log_enable", 1) modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 2) modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", 3) modparam("acc", "report_cancels", 1) modparam("acc", "cdr_on_failed", 1) modparam("acc", "cdr_enable", 1) modparam("acc", "cdr_facility", "LOG_LOCAL3") modparam("acc", "cdr_expired_dlg_enable", 1) modparam("acc", "cdr_start_on_confirmed", 1) modparam("acc", "cdr_extra", "call_id=$ci;src_ip=$si;fU=$fU;")" David VILLAUME

2 2

kamailio - failover setup
by Youssef Boujraf 04 Nov '19

04 Nov '19

Dear All, I have seen in the new kamailio release 5.3.0, kamailio support for haproxy protocol – both the v1 (human-readable) and v2 (binary) versions of the protocol are supported ( https://www.kamailio.org/w/kamailio-v5-3-0-release-notes/ ) but it seems to be for Database, webserver failover not for kamailio itself. Haproxy is ONLY supporting TCP but not UDP. My question is : I am looking for failover service of kamailio servers looks like haproxy but udp & tcp. - one domain name : sip.secure.com pointing my public ip address. - two kamailio server pointing same database content (user, whitelist, ...) no asterisk or pbx. Kamailio is used Only for signaling (users, whitelist & rtp) Monitoring service : identify who is the kamailio server online, offline and the ability to force all the SIP/RTP/MANAGEMENT connection from Kamailio Srv1 to Kamailio Srv2 and vice-versa ? Thanks for your suggestions. -- Youssef

4 4

Routing Blocks - Missing in latest core wiki
by Joel Serrano 31 Oct '19

31 Oct '19

Hi, I was looking at the documentation and noticed that "Routing Blocks" section is missing in latest releases... http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.2.x/core#routing_blocks is OK But: http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.3.x/core#routing_blocks http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core#routing_blocks Don't exist, have they been moved elsewhere? Thanks! Joel.

3 8

Command Line SIP client
by Gaurav Bmotra 31 Oct '19

31 Oct '19

hi i m looking for Command Line SIP client , where i can register user form CLI for testing thank you -- *Regards:* Gaurav Kumar

9 11

How to intercept an INVITE after waking up (TSILO module) to change SDP
by Oleg Podguyko 31 Oct '19

31 Oct '19

Hello everybody! Kamailio works as a Registrar. Additionally, rtpengine is deployed next to it. Using the module rtpgngine I change SDP. Webrtc <-> SIP calls work fine. RTPengine proxies media. It is necessary to understand that when the call comes, I determine what Protocol the call came wss/tcp/udp, and then through the command "rtpengine_manage" change SDP accordingly. Now I have a new task. Wake up mobile customers through push notification. This client may be as WebRTC and also regular SIP. Trying to use TSILO module. # User location service route[LOCATION] { lookup("location"); $var(rc) = $rc; if (is_method("INVITE")) { if (t_newtran()) { route(SEND_PUSH); xlog("L_INFO", "tsilo store\n"); ts_store(); } } switch ($var(rc)) { case 1: xlog("L_INFO", "LOCATION, Subscriber found, RC: $var(rc)\n"); route(RELAY); break; case -1: xlog("L_INFO", "LOCATION, Subscriber doesn't found, RC: $var(rc)\n"); exit; break; case -3: xlog("L_INFO", "LOCATION, Subscriber doesn't found, RC: $var(rc)\n"); send_reply("404", "Not Found"); exit; case -2: xlog("L_INFO", "LOCATION, Method Not Allowed, RC: $var(rc)\n"); send_reply("405", "Method Not Allowed"); exit; } } If a call occurs when the called client is registered, then we go to the route(RELAY), which creates a branch in which I change the SDP. Everything works. route[RELAY] { # enable additional event routes for forwarded requests # - serial forking, RTP relaying handling, a.s.o. if (is_method("INVITE|BYE")) { if(!t_is_set("branch_route")) t_on_branch("MANAGE_BRANCH"); } if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } And already in MANAGE BRANCH the necessary SDP is put. If the called party is not registered. In the beginning everything goes well. I find this caller through a separate server. Send push notification. The client successfully registers on kamailio. # Handle SIP registrations route[REGISTRAR] { if (!is_method("REGISTER")) return; if(isflagset(FLT_NATS)) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); setbflag(FLB_NATSIPPING); } if(isflagset(FLT_SRC_WSS)) { setbflag(FLB_DST_WS); } if (!save("location")) { sl_reply_error(); } ts_append("location", "$tu") exit; } Next I better show a piece of the log: окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: exec: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} *** cfgtrace:request_route=[REGISTRAR] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=429 a=26 n=ts_append окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: DEBUG: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} tsilo [ts_append.c:72]: ts_append(): transaction 8800:338205132 found for 1234567890, going to append branches окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: DEBUG: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} tm [t_lookup.c:1629]: t_lookup_ident_filter(): transaction found окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: DEBUG: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} registrar [lookup.c:255]: lookup_helper(): contact for [1234567890] found by address окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: DEBUG: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} registrar [lookup.c:456]: lookup_helper(): instance is окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: DEBUG: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} tm [t_append_branches.c:77]: t_append_branches(): transaction 8800:338205132 in status 0 окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: DEBUG: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} tm [t_append_branches.c:99]: t_append_branches(): Call uefn7rvufi112jj5lt91: 0 (1) outgoing branches окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: DEBUG: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} tm [t_append_branches.c:126]: t_append_branches(): Current uri sip:1234567890@10.10.10.1:58027;transport=TCP;rinstance=727a64a3a59c508f окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: DEBUG: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} <core> [core/msg_translator.c:162]: check_via_address(): (50.7.93.27, uas7i396ceb5.invalid, 0) окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: DEBUG: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} tm [t_append_branches.c:149]: t_append_branches(): added branch [sip:1234567890@10.10.10.1:58027;transport=TCP;rinstance=727a64a3a59c508f] with ruid [uloc-5dbacb09-4450-7] окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: DEBUG: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} tm [t_append_branches.c:163]: t_append_branches(): Call uefn7rvufi112jj5lt91: 0 (0) outgoing branches after clear_branches() окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: DEBUG: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2238]: tcpconn_send_put(): send from reader (17488 (21)), reusing fd окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: DEBUG: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2473]: tcpconn_do_send(): sending... окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: DEBUG: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2507]: tcpconn_do_send(): after real write: c= 0x7fb39dde4c68 n=3131 fd=12 окт 31 14:55:08 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17488]: DEBUG: {1 2 REGISTER cY6rPubTvJ3ZbyxOrrvGHw..} <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2508]: tcpconn_do_send(): buf= Thus, the transaction wakes up and the initial INVITE is sent to the new registered client without any SDP change! Which eventually leads to 415 error. Now the question itself. Tell me! As me at this moment intercept this INVITE, to it has passed through in advance prepared path for changing SDP. Thank you. -- Oleg Podguyko

1 0

kamailio - failover setup
by Ilie Soltanici 31 Oct '19

31 Oct '19

We are using keepalived with virtual IP Address for Kamailio, dispatcher module for Asterisk, 2 MySQL Databases master-master replicated and 2 Servers with ProxySQL. So far so good.

2 3

[abalashov@evaristesys.com: binrpc reply sizes]
by Alex Balashov 31 Oct '19

31 Oct '19

Hi, What is the relationship between the `ctl` modparams `binrpc_buffer_size`, `binrpc_max_body_size`, and `binrpc_struct_max_body_size`? More especially, how interdependent are they? Is there a set of circumstances in which one would wish for the structure buffer to be smaller than the reply body buffer? What about the internal buffer? Is it used only for some kind of intermediate formatting, or does it also hold the entire reply in some aspect? The reasons for asking are predictable: RPC command 'dlg.list' throws out "reply too big" on some occasions, and rather than simply increasing all of these drastically, I would like to learn more about which ones it makes sense to increase, and in what proportion with respect to each other. I also think this idea should be more clearly developed in the documentation. Thanks, -- Alex -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/

2 4

setbflag and isbflagset usage.
by Володимир Іванець 30 Oct '19

30 Oct '19

Hello! I'm using branch flags but not sure if the behavior is correct. There is a logic in branch route that decides if branch flag must be set and does it with this command: *setbflag(FLB_FLAG, $T_branch_idx)*. Then I'm checking if the flag is set with *if* statement later in the configuration file for requests and in onreply route for replies: *if (isbflagset(FLB_FLAG, $T_branch_idx))*. The thing is that *if* statement always returns true. The only way I can fix this behavior is to use *resetbflag* at the beginning of branch route: *resetbflag(FLB_SIPTOPUB, $T_branch_idx)*. Thank you! Regards, Volodya Ivanets.

1 0

strange conditional "if ($au!=$tU)" with previous exit
by PICCORO McKAY Lenz 30 Oct '19

30 Oct '19

i have this in asterisk integration how to, and i noted the "exit" before the "if($au!=$tU)" .. i dont understan the conditional and the exit there! please can someon xplain me that!? # authenticate the REGISTER requests (uncomment to enable auth) #!ifdef WITH_ASTERISK if (!www_authorize("$td", "sipusers")) #!else if (!www_authorize("$td", "subscriber")) #!endif { www_challenge("$td", "0"); exit; } if ($au!=$tU) { sl_send_reply("403","Forbidden auth ID"); exit; } i investigate at the kamailio cgf documentation and there's no clear topic related! http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.2.x/pseudovariables#tu_-_to_uri Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

3 3

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] Kamailio as SBC for Microsoft Teams
by Henning Westerholt 30 Oct '19

30 Oct '19

Hello Rhys, I already replied to you yesterday, maybe it got into Spam on your side. :-) Quote below: > thanks. About the presence integration question - according to my research currently the only possibility would be to use the > existing Skype APIs and then use this (per interop-mode) also in MS Teams. > > Microsoft announced the availability of a API to set the presence status also for Teams, this is now scheduled for Q1 2020. There > are other limitations which also needs to be solved from MS and they are also scheduled for Q1 2020. > Feel free to contact me directly if you are interested in this topics. Cheers, Henning Am 29.10.19 um 08:51 schrieb Rhys Hanrahan: Hi Henning, This is a great article, thanks for sharing. I'm wondering if you've experimented with the possibility of integration of presence/dialog information with teams as well? Pretty much every integration guide I've seen on MS's UC solutions, including the previous ones (Lync, Communicator, SFB ) always seem limited to integrating calling via trunks. To me, the integration is not complete unless you can integrate presence things like: * If a user is on the phone then their status should be "busy" on Teams. When off call, set back to Available. * If a user is on a call in teams, our PBX should consider their PBX extension as "in use". Not sure it's possible, because I haven't seen anything of the sort being done yet, but I'm curious if this is something you looked into at all? Thanks. Rhys Hanrahan Chief Information Officer Nexus One Pty Ltd E: support(a)nexusone.com.au<mailto:support@nexusone.com.au> P: +61 2 9191 0606 W: http://www.nexusone.com.au/ M: PO Box 127, Royal Exchange NSW 1225 A: Level 10 307 Pitt St, Sydney NSW 2000 [http://quintus.nexusone.com.au/~rhys/nexus1-email-sig.jpg] ________________________________ From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org><mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org> on behalf of Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de><mailto:hw@skalatan.de> Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2019 3:21 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio as SBC for Microsoft Teams Hello, I have created a “How-To” blog post on using Kamailio as “session border controller” for Microsoft Teams Direct Routing: https://skalatan.de/en/blog/kamailio-sbc-teams<https://skalatan.de/de/blog/kamailio-sbc-teams> You can this way use all the existing possibilities that Kamailio provide to interact with MS Teams as well. Best regards, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List sr-dev(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev -- Kamailio Merchandising - https://skalatan.de/merchandising/ Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/

2 2

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Older →

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users October 2019