Hello,
the next year Kamailio World Conference is planed to return in Berlin
for an in-person event at the usual location in the city center.
For the moment, we would like to announce the dates, respectively June
5-7, 2023.
If nothing unexpected happens meanwhile, the call for speakers and
registrations will be open at the beginning of 2023. We aim for a
similar structure like the past in-person events, with first day
starting around noon and targeting to be tutorial-oriented, followed by
2 days of conference presentations.
More details soon!
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Hi Team
Inserts require resources, especially on high load situations and if
there are a couple of indexes on the table.
As I use the dialogue module to create CDR, I would like to disable
the normal transaction based accounting.
I have attempted by not calling:
setflag(FLT_ACC)
setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED)
but I still get both, CDR and Transaction entries created in the
corresponding database tables.
How could I turn off transaction accounting?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden
______________________________________________________
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01
Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch
______________________________________________________
Hi,
I'm trying to capture and substitute the host IP of contact header using
the subst_hf but it's not working as expected. I tested my regex in a
tester and it works fine there but not in Kamailio config.
*Regex:* @(.+?)>
*Substitution:* @PUBLIC_IP:5060>
*Three contact headers that I'm trying to match;*
Contact:<sip:0065*7766@199.48.100.166:5060
>;methods="INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,OPTIONS,INFO,MESSAGE,SUBSCRIBE,NOTIFY,PRACK,UPDATE,REFER"
Contact: <sip:0065*7788@172.16.1.216
;transport=udp>;expires=3600;reg-id=1;+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:03660bc5-bb70-4784-8ac5-000413B108BA>"
Contact: <sip:0925*0007@199.48.100.166:5060>
*Outcome I'm expecting for the three contact headers;*
Contact:<sip:0065*7766*@PUBLIC_IP:5060>*
;methods="INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,OPTIONS,INFO,MESSAGE,SUBSCRIBE,NOTIFY,PRACK,UPDATE,REFER"
Contact: <sip:0065*7788*@PUBLIC_IP:5060>*
;expires=3600;reg-id=1;+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:03660bc5-bb70-4784-8ac5-000413B108BA>"
Contact: <sip:0925*0007*@PUBLIC_IP:5060>*
This regex in Kamailio works fine for the first and third contact header
but for the second contact header it matches all the way to the end of the
contact header excluding the quote (") sign. I've tried so many other
combinations [like *(a)(.+?)>;?* ] of regex but nothing seems to work.
Is there a way to accomplish this with one regex?
Thanks,
Sal
your expectation is wrong, that's how it works, all channels are
bi-directional and for that they use a queue.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:48:58 +0530
> From: Sharmila Sundar <sharmila.sundar(a)ecosmob.com>
> To: sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> Subject: [SR-Users] To stop automatic creation of RabbitMQ queues by
> kazoo module
> Message-ID:
> <CACcTecP1CfjuKdu33jEvZWUK2bE5ZSK37m-6xE1iEB=
> 9XwUCgg(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello Team,
>
> I run into a problem with Kazoo module.
>
> We noticed that , amqp_max_channels parameter creates automatic queues in
> Rabbitmq-server based on the channel number provided.
> Expecting that , it should create only channels not queues.
>
> This is the modparam I added
> modparam("kazoo", "amqp_max_channels", 12)
>
> Can any one help on this issue as why the kazoo module creates an automatic
> queue based on amqp_max_channels param ?
>
> Please find the screenshot attached from rabbitmq server
>
> Regards
> SharmilaS
>
>
Hello everyone,
According to this old thread, the db_extra fields in the acc module cannot be
integer:
https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2015-February/087053.html
Does this answer is still valid or is there another form to represent an
integer? since in my acc table I added an integer value field.
--
Jose Figueroa
Hello Team,
I run into a problem with Kazoo module.
We noticed that , amqp_max_channels parameter creates automatic queues in
Rabbitmq-server based on the channel number provided.
Expecting that , it should create only channels not queues.
This is the modparam I added
modparam("kazoo", "amqp_max_channels", 12)
Can any one help on this issue as why the kazoo module creates an automatic
queue based on amqp_max_channels param ?
Please find the screenshot attached from rabbitmq server
Regards
SharmilaS
--
* <https://www.ecosmob.com/>
*
*Disclaimer*
In addition to generic
Disclaimer which you have agreed on our website, any views or opinions
presented in this email are solely those of the originator and do not
necessarily represent those of the Company or its sister concerns. Any
liability (in negligence, contract or otherwise) arising from any third
party taking any action, or refraining from taking any action on the basis
of any of the information contained in this email is hereby excluded.
*Confidentiality*
This communication (including any attachment/s) is
intended only for the use of the addressee(s) and contains information that
is PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. Unauthorized reading, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. Please inform
originator if you have received it in error.
*Caution for viruses,
malware etc.*
This communication, including any attachments, may not be
free of viruses, trojans, similar or new contaminants/malware,
interceptions or interference, and may not be compatible with your systems.
You shall carry out virus/malware scanning on your own before opening any
attachment to this e-mail. The sender of this e-mail and Company including
its sister concerns shall not be liable for any damage that may incur to
you as a result of viruses, incompleteness of this message, a delay in
receipt of this message or any other computer problems.
Hello,
I'm using Kamailio v5.6.2 with presence, presence_xml, xcap_server, and rls
modules.
I pushed 2 documents to the xcap server:
1. urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:resource-lists
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<resource-lists xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:resource-lists">
<list name="friends">
<entry uri="sip:1001@example.com">
<display-name>1001</display-name>
</entry>
<entry uri="sip:1002@example.com">
<display-name>1002</display-name>
</entry>
</list>
</resource-lists>
2. urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rls-services
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rls-services xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rls-services"
xmlns:rl="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:resource-lists" xmlns:xsi="
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<service uri="sip:1000+presence@example.com">
<resource-list>
https://kamailio:5061/xcap-root/resource-lists/users/sip:1000@example.com/i…
"friends"]</resource-list>
<packages>
<package>presence</package>
</packages>
</service>
</rls-services>
I'm subscribing to presence event on rls-service
SUBSCRIBE sip:1000+presence@example.com SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.255.0.3:33883
;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjbe079f60-d0e0-4f1e-9f93-b18e467be5e8;alias
Max-Forwards: 70
From: "1000" <sip:1000@example.com>;tag=97ef0748-da39-442f-9a02-468b67134ad6
To: <sip:1000+presence@example.com>
Contact: <sip:20416583@10.255.0.3:5061;transport=tls>
Call-ID: 9773a68c-b001-49f0-9ffa-093beb3d8e36
CSeq: 18636 SUBSCRIBE
Event: presence
Expires: 600
Supported: 100rel, replaces, norefersub, gruu
Accept: multipart/related, application/rlmi+xml, application/pidf+xml
Allow-Events: presence
Supported: eventlist
User-Agent: sipsimple 5.2.6
Content-Length: 0
The RLS sends a NOTIFY immediately upon accepting the subscription
according to RFC 4662 and also the RLS is virtually subscribing to the
presence event on the 2 resources in the friends list
NOTIFY sip:20416583@10.255.0.3:5061;transport=tls SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TLS joey-local-proxy.example.com:5061
;branch=z9hG4bKa93d.b63e0697000000000000000000000000.0
To: <sip:1000@example.com>;tag=97ef0748-da39-442f-9a02-468b67134ad6
From: <sip:1000+presence@example.com
>;tag=e02a02cb113b2bdb8ebdb022d767e6d2-a1677c19
CSeq: 1 NOTIFY
Call-ID: 9773a68c-b001-49f0-9ffa-093beb3d8e36
Content-Length: 468
Max-Forwards: 70
Event: presence
Contact: <sip:kamailio@example.com:5060>
Subscription-State: active;expires=600
Require: eventlist
Content-Type:
multipart/related;type="application/rlmi+xml";start="<1668755827.sip:1000+presence@example.com.1700642067
>";boundary="1W1NaaaIIq6dOtLRXODFwqmC"
--1W1NaaaIIq6dOtLRXODFwqmC
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-ID: <1668755827.sip:1000+presence@example.com.1700642067>
Content-Type: application/rlmi+xml;charset="UTF-8"
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<list uri="sip:1000+presence@example.com"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:rlmi" version="1" fullState="true">
<resource uri="sip:1001@example.com"/>
<resource uri="sip:1002@example.com"/>
</list>
--1W1NaaaIIq6dOtLRXODFwqmC--
Now I’m changing the resource list using XCAP.
I’m sending a PUT request with a new document and I see that the change is
pushed to the DB but user 1000 is not receiving a NOTIFY with the updated
list.
This is the updated document:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<resource-lists xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:resource-lists">
<list name="friends">
<entry uri="sip:1001@example.com">
<display-name>1001</display-name>
</entry>
<entry uri="sip:1002@example.com">
<display-name>1002</display-name>
</entry>
<entry uri="sip:1003@example.com">
<display-name>1003</display-name>
</entry>
</list>
</resource-lists>
I see that Kamailio is virtually subscribing on 1003 (The newly added user)
but NOTIFY is not received.
Also tried to subscribe on xcap-diff event, and the subscription was
accepted successfully but no NOTIFY is received.
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Joey
Hi Kamailio community,
I am running an IPsec server beside Kamailio, so I am interested to know if there is any method to create a SIP listener on a specific port on the fly. I mean, when I create the IPsec SAs through the IPsec server, I ask Kamailio to create a listener/handler for that port too.This case might be very rare, but it is always good to hear community ideas.
Thank you.
Regards,Hossein
Hi.
Working on ims integration with the actual handset, have got a problem with
ipsec establishment to complete registration.
Initial steps are fine, including diameter exchange and 401 (with security
server details) toward UE. On the next step UE and kamailio should
establish ipsec connection, and UE to submit the next register with a
response. As per trace UE is trying to establish the same (can see initial
TCP SYN encapsulated onto ESP), using port-s, provided in Security-Server,
but get an ICMP packet from server with destination/protocol unreachable.
No more info either in P-SCSF log, no in kern.log. Proxy is listening to
that port, it is tcp and available over telnet, so should not be a
connectivity issue.
Please let know if any ideas how to troubleshoot that further,
--
obelousov.tel