- sr-users - kamailio.org

socket names for command line parameter "listen"
by Xenofon Karamanos 23 Aug '24

23 Aug '24

Hello all, I wanted to inform you about an upcoming change regarding the syntax we use for defining socket names in the listen (-l) command line argument. Current Syntax: -l udp:10.10.10.10:5060/11.11.11.11:5060 Proposed Options: 1. -l udp:10.10.10.10:5060/11.11.11.11:5060=s1 2. -l s1=udp:10.10.10.10:5060/11.11.11.11:5060 ( A draft PR about this option can be found in https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3954) [https://opengraph.githubassets.com/69f8a4a1d2c8988372b4942f84bde95de94502d2…]<https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3954> main: Add support for naming socket in cli by xkaraman · Pull Request #3954 · kamailio/kamailio<https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3954> Pre-Submission Checklist Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) Each component has a single... github.com Please note that the socket name (s1) in both options is/should be optional. The change will allow for better clarity and flexibility when defining sockets, particularly when a name needs to be assigned and match the config file style. I would appreciate your feedback on which syntax you find more intuitive or any concerns you might have with these options. Your input is important to ensure a smooth transition. Best regards, Xenofon

2 2

Kamailio cluster options
by Ali Taher 22 Aug '24

22 Aug '24

Hello all, I'm using Kamailio as SIP redirect (act as routing decision for SBC) depending mainly on sqlops and db_postgres modules, and it's working perfectly. What I need now is to have a kind of cluster of Kamailio servers for high availability purpose. What is the best option for me ? BR

2 1

push server tcp problem
by Bernd Krueger-Knauber 20 Aug '24

20 Aug '24

Hi, I implemented an apple and android push server/proxy with kamailio 5.8.1. The server/proxy is transparent. It works fine with UDP, since the registration after the push comes from the same ip and port. So t_continue works without problems. (We use the new registration as signal thet the phone is ready) If we use tcp at the client, he gets the push, wakes up and send the new registration on an other port. The SIP stack uses now an other connection. t_continue fails, because it uses the old data of the original invite acccording to the first registration. Is it possible to change the stored connection values according to the new registration data? Best regards, Bernd

2 2

low performance with udp_children and async_workers
by elhar.mohamed＠gmail.com 19 Aug '24

19 Aug '24

Hello, Based on business requirements, 35% of invites should be handled by async_workers and 65% with be handled by main children. The target is 1500cps. I'm using the following conf : children=64 async_worker=128 when doing performance tests using SIPp, I figured out the 1500cps is well supported by the conf above, but when I updated the data in database to not use anymore async workers, the cps is getting decreased and it was between 200 and 500. This a client requirements is to be able to enable/disable feature that needs to be handled by async workers. Could you please help me on this? Thanks in advance

4 12

Inbound call to webRTC failing with TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found
by hollis.rhonda＠gmail.com 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

We're seeing an issue where some webRTC clients are not receiving inbound calls. Kamailio logs show the following error: WARNING: {1 609669922 INVITE BW152025538120824-895739618(a)10.103.43.11}: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:3007]: via_builder(): TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found ERROR: {1 609669922 INVITE BW152025538120824-895739618(a)10.103.43.11}: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2086]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header ERROR: {1 609669922 INVITE BW152025538120824-895739618(a)10.103.43.11}: tm [t_fwd.c:484]: prepare_new_uac(): could not build request ERROR: {1 609669922 INVITE BW152025538120824-895739618(a)10.103.43.11}: tm [t_fwd.c:1764]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches DEBUG: {1 609669922 INVITE BW152025538120824-895739618(a)10.103.43.11}: tm [t_funcs.c:358]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned error -2 (-2) DEBUG: {1 609669922 INVITE BW152025538120824-895739618(a)10.103.43.11}: tm [t_funcs.c:376]: t_relay_to(): -2 error reply generation delayed It seems to be happening after the client has been connected to Kamailio for more than 24 hours. The socket connection details look correct in the external DB and in the output of ws.dump, core.tcp_list, and ul.dump. A restart of Kamailio or a reload of the webRTC client, triggering a new websocket connection, will clear the issue. However, we haven't been able to determine exactly when and why a client ends up in this state. While a client is in this state, REGISTER requests are still handled successfully, they can make outbound calls and TCP keepalives from the client are working. I'm still working on trying to debug this with GDB so I can see what the value of send_info is in https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/core/msg_translator.c#…, but I wasn't having luck with multiple child processes running, and now my client has reloaded and is working again. I've restarted Kamailio with a single child process, so when it does start failing again, I may have better luck with GDB. Any thoughts on what might be causing clients to get into this state? Whatever additional information I can provide that might help, I'm happy to share. Thanks!

2 4

secfilter (and more modules) in kamailio kemi
by bazrafshan.m.h＠protonmail.com 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

Hi guys, some modules are not shown in Kamailio Kemi's documentation, such as secfilter. Is there any way to load them and use them in Python? a way is to simulate the secfilter but it is not a general solution. (Sorry in advance for the obvious question)

3 2

[http_client] KEMI use "curl_connect_post" send http request error
by 17603019528＠163.com 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

ALL: Hi, here is my lua script: ``` local body = '{"ip":"172.16.4.111", "ports":[5261, 5260]}' local resp = "" local code = KSR.http_client.curl_connect_post("configapi", "", "application/json", body, resp) ``` the error is : ``` 24(2406) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1024]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[0] for: curl_connect_post is str: configapi 24(2406) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1024]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[1] for: curl_connect_post is str: 24(2406) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1024]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[2] for: curl_connect_post is str: application/json 24(2406) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1024]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[3] for: curl_connect_post is str: {"ip":"172.16.4.111", "ports":[5261, 5260]} 24(2406) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1024]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[4] for: curl_connect_post is str: 24(2406) ERROR: <core> [core/pvapi.c:429]: pv_cache_get(): invalid parameters 24(2406) ERROR: http_client [http_client.c:739]: ki_curl_connect_post(): failed to get pv spec for: ``` I know the error means: "resp" type is not right, what is the correct type ? I search google for this issue, no one knows, someone please help me. Thinks

2 2

TLS module doesn't support TLSV1
by o.atef＠fiberme.com 15 Aug '24

15 Aug '24

Hello Brothers, I've installed kamailio throw "apt install" on Debian and it's installed version: kamailio 5.6.3 (x86_64/linux). Now I've a big problem that kamailio cannot running with TLSv1 and it has to be TLSv1.2+ as tls.cfg doc said: # We do not enable anything else than TLSv1.2+ # over the public internet. Clients do not have # to present client certificates by default. How could I avoid this restriction please to enable TLSv1? Thank you,

5 5

[PHONENUM] Match with country on Lua/KSR
by João Silva 14 Aug '24

14 Aug '24

Hello everyone! The function phonenum_match_cn from module PHONENUM is not available on KSR. Is there any work around to use it on Lua config? Best regards, Joao

2 2

Incoming call with one one way audio and ctting off after thirty seconds
by palany 14 Aug '24

14 Aug '24

I have integrated Microsoft teams and freepbx using Kamailio version 5.8 as my SBC. Calls from freepbx to teams are working fine with audio and I am having challenges with calls from teams to freepbx. The calls rings and after answering there is only way audio and the call drops off after thirty seconds. My pbx is behind a microtik router and I have port forwarded my sip port and rtp ports to freepbx and have also disabled sip alg. My Kamailio is hosted in AWS. I have attached both my pcap from Kamailio, freepbx and my Kamailio.cfg. I am thinking It's a misconfiguration challenge or something else. Please help I am failing to see my challenge. Best Regards,

3 3

Authentication
by Vishal Pai 13 Aug '24

13 Aug '24

Hello All I am using kamailio sip account as gateway at Freeswitch side but when I enable caller id from = true then call from Freeswitch to kamailio didn’t authenticate As I check it’s about from header when I disable caller id from = false the call get authenticate since it get sip username and domain but when there is caller id the from header get callerid@ip address Can anyone guide me Thanks

2 1

Kamailio hangs on get_profile_size method.
by satyaprakash ch 12 Aug '24

12 Aug '24

HI, We are facing a hang issue with Kamailio for the get_profile_size method. Randomly, the Kamailio got hangs, and the CPU went 100%. During the hanging time, we generated the TRAP and we could see that the hang happened on the get_profile_size method. We are getting this hang randomly in dlg_profile.c of the following lines: The hang occurs, causing the CPU to spike to 100% at one of the following lines randomly: 1. if(value->len == ph->value.len && memcmp(value->s, ph->value.s, value->len) == 0) { 2. ph = ph->next; 3. while(ph != profile->entries[i].first); During our analysis, we found that PROCESS ID 7608 gets a spike of 100% utilization. We suspect there may be an issue with the processing of the 'ph' variable, but we couldn't identify the root cause. I've attached the Kamailio TRAP for further details. Could you please suggest what might be causing this problem and how we can resolve it? Thank you.

1 1

Best Practices for Scaling Kamailio in a Large VoIP Deployment
by Maria Jonas 10 Aug '24

10 Aug '24

Hello Kamailio Community, I am currently working on a large scale VoIP deployment and would love to get insights on the best practices for scaling Kamailio. Our current setup handles a moderate volume of calls,,, but we’re expecting a significant increase in traffic soon. Specifically.., I am looking for advice on: -Optimizing Kamailio’s configuration for high availability and performance. -Efficiently managing load balancing and failover. -Recommended hardware specifications for large-scale operations. -Common pitfalls to avoid when scaling up. Any tips or resources you could share would be greatly appreciated. If you have experience with similar projects,,, I’d love to hear about your setups and any challenges you faced. Thank you! Maria [aws](https://www.igmguru.com/cloud-computing/aws-developer-certification-tr…

4 4

Kamailio hangs on get_profile_size method.
by satyaprakash ch 09 Aug '24

09 Aug '24

HI, We are facing a hang issue with Kamailio for the get_profile_size method. Ramdomly, the Kamailio got hangs, and the CPU went 100%. During the hanging time, we generated the TRAP and we could see that the hang happened on the get_profile_size method. We are getting this hang randomly in dlg_profile.c of the following lines: The hang occurs, causing the CPU to spike to 100% at one of the following lines randomly: 1. if(value->len == ph->value.len && memcmp(value->s, ph->value.s, value->len) == 0) { 2. ph = ph->next; 3. while(ph != profile->entries[i].first); During our analysis, we found that PROCESS ID 7608 gets a spike of 100% utilization. We suspect there may be an issue with the processing of the 'ph' variable, but we couldn't identify the root cause. I've attached the Kamailio TRAP for further details. Could you please suggest what might be causing this problem and how we can resolve it? Thank you.

1 0

Incoming call with one one way audio and cutting off after thirty seconds
by palany 08 Aug '24

08 Aug '24

I have integrated Microsoft teams and freepbx using Kamailio version 5.8 as my SBC. Calls from freepbx to teams are working fine with audio and I am having challenges with calls from teams to freepbx. The calls rings and after answering there is only way audio and the call drops off after thirty seconds. My pbx is behind a microtik router and I have port forwarded my sip port and rtp ports to freepbx and have also disabled sip alg. My Kamailio is hosted in AWS. Below are google drive links logs for the incoming call in Kamailio , freepbx and my Kamailio.cfg. I am thinking It's a misconfiguration challenge or something else. Please help I am failing to see my challenge. kamailio.pcap - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aoJhksgwcH-52unwxuyzn8GAmG9PEnOM/view?usp=s haring freepbx.pcap - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JJXs9UOUFak5Y4uWI_ARB56vQfVYfSDj/view?usp=s haring kamailio.cfg - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1v2ZtylOf8fIMYH4OckGmnP489PO7WI7J/view?usp=s haring Best Regards

2 2

Dialog timer reset on UPDATE
by Alex Balashov 08 Aug '24

08 Aug '24

Hi, I have a dialog where I have set: dlg_set_property("timeout-noreset"); But it seems the timeout is reset anyway when handling an in-dialog UPDATE request, at least, on Kamailio 5.5.4. This does not seem to happen with reinvites. I haven't been able to get more information thus far, other than to be able to say that there is nothing unusual about the UPDATE request and there are no additional errors at log level 2. I was wondering if anyone else has encountered this. -- Alex -- Alex Balashov Principal Consultant Evariste Systems LLC Web: https://evaristesys.com Tel: +1-706-510-6800

1 0

app_python3 method not found or is not callable
by Westhuis, Johannes 08 Aug '24

08 Aug '24

Hi, we are using kamailio with app_python3. It works very good, but in some cases, there are error logs stating: app_python3 [python_exec.c:91]: apy_exec(): <python method> not found or is not callable It happens sporadically, and a restart of kamailio fixes it. As far as i can see it might be linked to concurrent arrival of several messages. Best regards, Johannes # kamailio -v version: kamailio 5.5.6 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: compiled on 12:01:03 Jul 22 2024 with gcc 10.2.1

1 0

http_async_query on carrierfailureroute changes rd back to carrieroute primary
by Maharaja Azhagiah 07 Aug '24

07 Aug '24

Hi I am running kamailio 5.4 on debian I have carrierfailureroute configured incase of primary service provider fails. I also have Stirshaken configured to add Identity header on outbound calls. Issue is when call fail overs to carrierfailureroute, http_async_query changes $ru to the primary carrier From the debug logs, when primary carrier sends a 488 (primary carrier expects SIP TLS but my call is UDP - to test the failover scenario) 39(285) DEBUG: {1 18398 INVITE 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn} tmx [t_var.c:561]: pv_get_tm_reply_code(): reply code is <488> 39(285) DEBUG: {1 18398 INVITE 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn} carrierroute [cr_func.c:178]: set_next_domain_on_rule(): searching for matching routing rules39(285) INFO: {1 18398 INVITE 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn} carrierroute [cr_func.c:197]: set_next_domain_on_rule(): next_domain is 47987 Carrier route rewrites the failover carrier 39(285) INFO: {1 18398 INVITE 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn} carrierroute [cr_func.c:706]: cr_do_route(): uri 14371234567 was rewritten to sip:14371234567@sip.primaryprovider.com, carrier 1, domain 47987 Before http_async_query rd and ru are still the failover carrier 39(285) INFO: {1 18398 INVITE 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn} <script>: [callid: 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn] - [cfg:2976] - Debug testing ----- rd is sip.primaryprovider.com ----- ru is sip:14371234567@sip.primaryprovider.com 39(285) DEBUG: {1 18398 INVITE 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn} http_async_client [async_http.c:469]: async_send_query(): transaction suspended [5261:1830449764] 39(285) DEBUG: {1 18398 INVITE 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn} http_async_client [async_http.c:625]: async_push_query(): query sent [ https://authn-uat.ccid.neustar.biz/ccid/authn/v2/identity?apiKey=randomkey] (0x7fdcad097e60) to worker 1 However, when the route is being called after the http_async_query it changes to the primary one: 26(272) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1612]: t_lookup_ident_filter(): transaction found 26(272) DEBUG: http_async_client [async_http.c:235]: async_http_cb(): resuming transaction (5261:1830449764) 26(272) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1612]: t_lookup_ident_filter(): transaction found 26(272) INFO: <script>: [callid: 8EmmsLqNuMRYBduMqFgX3w4JHAn4C2xn] - [cfg:2995] - Debug testing ----- rd is 1.2.3.4 ----- ru is sip:14371234567@1.2.3.4:5061;transport=TLS Due to this, call keeps going to the primary and it fails if ( http_async_query(STIRSHAKEN_AS_URL, "AS_RESPONSE") == -1 ) { xlog("L_ERR ", "[cfg:$cfg(line)] Failed to connect AS service for token $fu -> $tu \n"); return; } route[AS_RESPONSE] { xlog("L_INFO", "[callid: $ci] - [cfg:$cfg(line)] - Debug testing ----- rd is $rd ----- ru is $ru\n"); if ($http_ok) { xlog("L_INFO", "[cfg:$cfg(line)] Resuming outbound call transaction for $fu -> $tu Received - $http_rb \n"); # Add identity and Date headers if (jansson_get("identity", $http_rb, "$var(identity)")) { insert_hf("Identity: $var(identity)\n", "Content-Length"); } if (jansson_get("date", $http_rb, "$var(date)")) { if ($hdr(Date) != $null){ remove_hf("Date"); } insert_hf("Date: $var(date)\n", "Identity"); } } else { xlog("L_ERR", "[cfg:$cfg(line)] Resuming outbound call transaction. Error - $http_err)\n"); } route(RELAY); exit; } Please help to understand why rd / ru changes to primary carrier. Regards, Maharaja Azhagiah

3 7

Kamailio hang Issue
by satyaprakash ch 06 Aug '24

06 Aug '24

Hi, We are encountering a hang issue after deploying the following code: *route(DLG_MANAGE);* *if ($dlg_var(voip_id) == $null) { $dlg_var(voip_id) = $hdr(X-Voip-ID);}route[DLG_MANAGE] { if (is_method("INVITE")) { dlg_manage(); }}* This code includes the set_dialog_profile. We have this setup with 2 proxy servers with DMQ enabled, but the issue only occurs on one proxy. When the Kamailio proxy hangs, no logs are written. If you have any suggestions to resolve this issue, please help. Thanks.

2 2

Kamailio-IMS: After a abornamal Call, other call is not working (even after a new registration)
by deep.upreti＠gmail.com 05 Aug '24

05 Aug '24

Hello, Can anyone help me to resolve one issue? scenario is - 1- Register two UE (UE-A and UE-B) 2- Call from UE-A to UE-B for a specific duration (lets say: 100 seconds) 3 Verify if call is working: Answer is YES, call is working. 4. shutdown the eNB 5. Observation: No BYE/De-registration message is not coming as expected. 6. Again start eNB and register same UE (UE-A and UE-B) 7. Register UE-A and UE-B both 8. It will not remove previous contacts or not updating the reg-state. 9. I am running with Rx enable mode.

1 1

Multiple TLS connections to the same IP:Port
by Nick Digalakis 05 Aug '24

05 Aug '24

Hello everyone, I am trying to use a single Kamailio server to register to multiple MS Teams Direct Routing endpoints. The config snippet I am using is this: sht_iterator_start("i1", "teams-endpoints"); while(sht_iterator_next("i1")) { $var(teams_endpoint) = $shtitkey(i1); $xavp(tls=>server_name) = $var(teams_endpoint); $xavp(tls[0]=>server_id) = $var(teams_endpoint); $uac_req(method)="OPTIONS"; $uac_req(ruri)="sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls"; $uac_req(furi)="sip:" + $var(teams_endpoint); $uac_req(turi)="sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls"; $uac_req(hdrs)="Contact: <sip:" + $var(teams_endpoint) + ":" + "5061" + ";transport=tls>\r\n"; ### Create a unique Call-ID based on the Timestamp and the Message Body in MD5 $var(unhashed_cid) = $TV(Sn) + $mb + ""; $uac_req(callid)=$(var(unhashed_cid){s.md5}); uac_req_send(); } sht_iterator_end("i1"); When the HTable has only one endpoint, everything works fine. When I add a second endpoint, the first one continues to work but the second one failing with the error from Microsoft: Q.850;cause=63;text="85babcde-e0b5-4a85-8f4a-12345678c9ae;SBC certificate is not issued correctly. Provided trunk FQDN 'endpoint-02.domain.com' is not included in certificate's CN or SAN list. Certificate allows following FQDNs only: endpoint-01.domain.com. After some digging around, I realized that all endpoint after the first fail because Kamailio is re-using the same TLS connection for all subsequent OPTIONS as well, but of course the connection has been established with the certificate of the first endpoint. I have tested the certificates by switching around the first endpoint, so that shouldn't be a problem. Is there any way I can force it to establish a new TCP/TLS connection for each subsequent request? Any help would be much appreciated, I have been pulling my hair out with this one! Best regards, Nick [https://s-install.avcdn.net/ipm/preview/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-…]<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_cam…> Virus-free.www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_cam…>

2 2

How to log datetime in files
by 陈子妍 04 Aug '24

04 Aug '24

Hello! I am working on with Kamailio, I have already understood to add log prefix like `log_prefix="NAT {$rm $mt $hdr(CSeq) $ci}: "`, but I also want to record event time, so how can I config `datetime` in log files. Thanks~

3 2

Why does $T(id_index) return 0 even though t_suspend() is executed successfully?
by mm e 01 Aug '24

01 Aug '24

if(t_suspend()) { $dlg_var(start_time) = $timef(%Y/%m/%d %H:%M:%S); xlog("L_NOTICE", "==> processing suspended in transaction [$T(id_index):$T(id_label)] "); } else { xlog("L_ERR", "t_suspend err"); exit; } Sometimes, I get this log==> processing suspended in transaction [0:13614] "，as far as I know, 0 means that the value cannot be obtained. Executing t_continue(tindex, tlabel, rtname) with parameter 0 will fail.by the way, It's a question of probability.

1 0

Re: Possible Kamailio memmory leak - version 5.8.2
by Vanderlei Torres Batistela 31 Jul '24

31 Jul '24

Hello Daniel, Regarding your question, I think only the avp(msg) should be destroyed as others avp's can be used elsewhere in the script. I tried the lastest git master and when restarting kamailio I got a segmentation fault: Jul 18 21:17:16 labcom070 systemd[1]: Started Kamailio - the Open Source SIP Server. Jul 18 21:17:17 labcom070 kernel: kamailio[2285]: segfault at 0 ip 00000000007eb66a sp 00007ffd7f80cc00 error 6 in kamailio[400000+533000] Jul 18 21:17:17 labcom070 kernel: Code: 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 48 81 ec c8 00 00 00 48 89 bd 48 ff ff ff 48 89 b5 40 ff ff ff 48 89 95 38 ff ff ff 48 8b 85 48 ff ff ff <48> c7 00 00 00 00 00 48 8b 85 48 ff ff ff c7 40 08 00 00 00 00 48 Jul 18 21:17:17 labcom 070 systemd[1]: Started Process Core Dump (PID 2286/UID 0). Jul 18 21:17:18 labcom070 systemd-coredump[2287]: Resource limits disable core dumping for process 2285 (kamailio). Jul 18 21:17:18 labcom070 systemd-coredump[2287]: Process 2285 (kamailio) of user 993 dumped core. Jul 18 21:17:18 labcom070 systemd[1]: kamailio.service: Main process exited, code=dumped, status=11/SEGV Jul 18 21:17:18 labcom070 systemd[1]: kamailio.service: Failed with result 'core-dump'. Jul 18 21:17:18 labcom070 systemd[1]: systemd-coredump(a)6-2286-0.service: Succeeded. Jul 18 21:17:18 labcom070 systemd[1]: kamailio.service: Service RestartSec=100ms expired, scheduling restart. Jul 18 21:17:18 labcom070 systemd[1]: kamailio.service: Scheduled restart job, restart counter is at 1. Jul 18 21:17:18 labcom070 systemd[1]: Stopped Kamailio - the Open Source SIP Server. Jul 18 21:17:18 labcom070 kernel: kamailio[2298]: segfault at 0 ip 00000000007eb66a sp 00007ffcd101c240 error 6 in kamailio[400000+533000] Jul 18 21:17:18 labcom070 kernel: Code: 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 48 81 ec c8 00 00 00 48 89 bd 48 ff ff ff 48 89 b5 40 ff ff ff 48 89 95 38 ff ff ff 48 8b 85 48 ff ff ff <48> c7 00 00 00 00 00 48 8b 85 48 ff ff ff c7 40 08 00 00 00 00 48 Regards, Vanderlei ________________________________ De: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Enviado: quinta-feira, 18 de julho de 2024 02:51 Para: Vanderlei Torres Batistela <v.batistela(a)hotmail.com>; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> Assunto: Re: [SR-Users] Possible Kamailio memmory leak - version 5.8.2 Hello, indeed the previous commit was destroying a single avp, I pushed a new one to destroy all of them with that name. I am wondering if all avps, no matter the name should be destroyed. Anyhow, could you fetch the latest git master version and try your scenario again? Cheers, Daniel

1 0

[TM] [ASYNC] : Freeing transaction after sending 302 response
by elhar.mohamed＠gmail.com 31 Jul '24

31 Jul '24

Hello, I'm using the async_task_group_route for async module to handle some invites, when testing with sipp tools, I got some Dead call error message and after investigating It seems that for the same invite I sent multiple 302 message to sipp because the ACK sent by sipp was not handle before thr retr_timer1 & retr_timer2. Please can you help me to free the transaction after sending the first 302 ? Thank you in advance.

1 0

secfilter (and more modules) in kamailio kemi
by bazrafshan.m.h＠protonmail.com 28 Jul '24

28 Jul '24

Hi guys, some modules are not shown in Kamailio Kemi's documentation, such as secfilter. Is there any way to load them and use them in Python? a way is to simulate the secfilter but it is not a general solution. (Sorry in advance for the obvious question)

1 0

secfilter (and more modules) in kamailio kemi
by bazrafshan.m.h＠protonmail.com 28 Jul '24

28 Jul '24

Hi guys, some modules are not shown in Kamailio Kemi's documentation, such as secfilter. Is there any way to load them and use them in Python? a way is to simulate the secfilter but it is not a general solution. (Sorry in advance for the obvious question)

1 0

secfilter (and more modules) in kamailio kemi
by bazrafshan.m.h＠protonmail.com 28 Jul '24

28 Jul '24

Hi guys, some modules are not shown in Kamailio Kemi's documentation, such as secfilter. Is there any way to load them and use them in Python? a way is to simulate the secfilter but it is not a general solution. (Sorry in advance for the obvious question)

1 0

Job: System Engineer VoIP - Germany / HO
by Gerrit Jacobsen 25 Jul '24

25 Jul '24

VIER is looking for a System Engineer VoIP What VIER does VIER is a global contact center technology provider. VIER develops and runs its own technology in several data centers. You will be part of the Real-time Media Processing Team which is responsible for the telephony connections between carriers, applications and call-center agents. Your mission You are responsible for the support of the VoIP systems as well as the associated infrastructure Since you have sovereignty over the VoIP systems, you are also responsible for performing system upgrades and configurations. You have a lot of freedom to design, plan, and implement new VoIP system components for internal and external projects. You manage and implement change requests and are a specialist for special topics in the communication area. You show a high-sense of responsibility and foresight to keep systems running 24/7 You are prepared to work occasionally also in the evening hours to roll out new features Your skills You have several years experience in the day-to-day operation of telecom systems You have worked extensively with opensource VoIP software such as Kamailio / OpenSIPS, FreeSWITCH You can administer Linux systems such as RockyLinux and Debian You know SIP, RTP, RTCP, TLS, WebRTC protocols and can debug problems with Wireshark You have also worked with MySQL, Git You are communicative and like to work with team colleagues Further beneficial skills Experience with Ansible or Puppet for automation and configuration management. CheckMK, Homer, Hepic, Redis, CGRates, CDR Tools, Python Own VoIP software projects German language skills Please apply here: https://vier.jobs.personio.de/job/1638419?language=en&display=en

1 0

RTJSON: No Json for routing
by felipe.nunes＠comuniki.me 24 Jul '24

24 Jul '24

Good afternoon I have the following error in the application: [rtjson_routing.c:701]: rtjson_update_branch(): no json for routing This error occurs regardless of whether there is high demand or not and the application sending the data correctly. Can you help me with this? Felipe Nunes

2 1

ds_select from xhttp:request
by Christian Berger 24 Jul '24

24 Jul '24

Hi, we want to execute ds_select from an xhttp:request event route. The idea is to be able to get all active targets of a dispatcher set so our monitoring can check that via http which would be convenient for us. So are there any reasons why ds_select wouldn't work in an xhttp:request even route? Regards Christian Berger -- Christian Berger - berger(a)sipgate.de Telefon: +49 (0)211-63 55 55-0 Telefax: +49 (0)211-63 55 55-22 sipgate GmbH - Gladbacher Str. 74 - 40219 Düsseldorf HRB Düsseldorf 39841 - Geschäftsführer: Thilo Salmon, Tim Mois Steuernummer: 106/5724/7147, Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE219349391 www.sipgate.de - www.sipgate.co.uk

3 2

Listening on multiple TLS ports
by João Silva 23 Jul '24

23 Jul '24

Hello everyone! Is there a way to define a listen port range for TCP/TLS? Or any macro I can use to create the LISTEN commands? And finally is there a performance penalty for having multiple (2k) listening ports at the same time? I am in a strange situation where I need to register multiple credentials on a single SIP trunk, for each registration I need to use a different local port otherwise the trunk will simply overwrite the previous registrations. Furthermore, when I place a call on that trunk I have to be consistent with the port I used for registration for that specific credential. So I am looking into explicitly defining the port to be used per credential, UACREG allows me to use the contact_addr/socket for the registration part and for placing of outbound calls I can use $fsn to force the correct socket. Best regards, Joao

3 4

IMS PCSCF force source IP address
by Anthony Blandin 23 Jul '24

23 Jul '24

Hello, I am using Kamailio pcscf with ipsec. I have one ipsec listen address which is used by the UE to connect to the PCSCF and one other listen address on port 5060. During the registration until the ipsec is not established, the UE sends the requests to the ipsec listen address and the pcscf is using the other listen address to forward the sip request to the ICSCF. That's is ok for me. But when the ipsec is established after the 200 OK REGISTER, the UE sends a SUBSCRIBE but the pcscf forwards the SUBSCRIBE to the SCSCF using its ipsec listen address instead of the other listen address. I tried to use $fs to force the socket but without success. Do you know how to force the source IP address to be used on the pcscf? Thanks for your support. Regards, Anthony

1 0

mysql error after migration from 5.7.5 to 5.7.6
by Alejandro Guralnik 23 Jul '24

23 Jul '24

Hello, After upgraded from kamailio 5.7.5 to 5.7.6, when did start kamailio process, got the following error: WARNING: db_mysql [km_my_con.c:179]: db_mysql_new_connection(): opt_ssl_ca option not supported by mysql version (value (null)) - ignoring After downgrade to 5.7.5 dind't happened. (we don't use mysql ssl connection).

2 3

Best Practices for Scaling Kamailio in a Large VoIP Deployment
by Maria Jonas 23 Jul '24

23 Jul '24

Hello Kamailio Community, I am currently working on a large scale VoIP deployment and would love to get insights on the best practices for scaling Kamailio. Our current setup handles a moderate volume of calls,,, but we’re expecting a significant increase in traffic soon. Specifically.., I am looking for advice on: -Optimizing Kamailio’s configuration for high availability and performance. -Efficiently managing load balancing and failover. -Recommended hardware specifications for large-scale operations. -Common pitfalls to avoid when scaling up. Any tips or resources you could share would be greatly appreciated. If you have experience with similar projects,,, I’d love to hear about your setups and any challenges you faced. Thank you! Maria https://www.igmguru.com/cloud-computing/aws-developer-certification-trainin…

1 0

Best Practices for Scaling Kamailio in a Large VoIP Deployment
by Maria Jonas 23 Jul '24

23 Jul '24

Hello Kamailio Community, I am currently working on a large scale VoIP deployment and would love to get insights on the best practices for scaling Kamailio. Our current setup handles a moderate volume of calls,,, but we’re expecting a significant increase in traffic soon. Specifically.., I am looking for advice on: -Optimizing Kamailio’s configuration for high availability and performance. -Efficiently managing load balancing and failover. -Recommended hardware specifications for large-scale operations. -Common pitfalls to avoid when scaling up. Any tips or resources you could share would be greatly appreciated. If you have experience with similar projects,,, I’d love to hear about your setups and any challenges you faced. Thank you! Maria <a href="https://www.igmguru.com/cloud-computing/aws-developer-certification-trainin…">aws</a>

1 0

SHM Memory leak?
by Ihor Olkhovskyi 23 Jul '24

23 Jul '24

Hello! I'm trying to get where all the SHM memory gone. For the moment I'm using these settings: -m 8192 -M 1024 which means 8G of SHM meory. Kamailio parameters are the following fork=yes children=8 tcp_children=12 enable_tls=yes enable_sctp=no tls_threads_mode=2 tcp_accept_no_cl=yes tcp_max_connections=63536 tls_max_connections=63536 tcp_accept_aliases=no tcp_async=yes tcp_connect_timeout=10 tcp_conn_wq_max=63536 tcp_crlf_ping=yes tcp_delayed_ack=yes tcp_fd_cache=yes tcp_keepalive=yes tcp_keepcnt=3 tcp_keepidle=30 tcp_keepintvl=10 tcp_linger2=30 tcp_rd_buf_size=80000 tcp_send_timeout=10 tcp_wq_blk_size=2100 tcp_wq_max=10485760 open_files_limit=63536 And having ~1000 TLS/WSS clients I'm getting this after 3 days of running: { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": [ "shmem:fragments = 2796", "shmem:free_size = 3737947072", (3.7 G) "shmem:max_used_size = 4857418512", (4.8 G) "shmem:real_used_size = 4851987520", "shmem:total_size = 8589934592", "shmem:used_size = 4838988096" (4.8 G) ], "id": 984479 } Means half of SHM memory is gone When running kamcmd mod.stats all shm I'm getting (output truncated for the largest values) Module: core { ... tcpconn_new(1201): 130669280 (0.13 G) ... Total: 131657632 (0.13 G) } Module: sl { ... Total: 7520 } Module: siptrace { ... Total: 13520 } Module: rr { Total: 0 } Module: dialog { ... Total: 146080 } Module: permissions { ... Total: 62144 } Module: htable { .... Total: 3359552 (3.3 M) } Module: rtpengine { ... Total: 31456 } Module: textopsx { Total: 0 } Module: tsilo { ... Total: 75072 } Module: tm { .... Total: 3459504 (3.4 M) } Module: usrloc { .... Total: 1217616 } Module: pua_dialoginfo { ... Total: 8720 } Module: pua { ... Total: 150848 } Module: pike { ... Total: 9504 } Module: websocket { wsconn_add(198): 54139856 (54 M) ... Total: 54148096 (54 M) } Module: debugger { ... Total: 21872 } Module: tmx { Total: 512 } Module: kex { .... Total: 1888 } Module: tls { ... ser_malloc(364): 87246112 (87 M) ... Total: 87997168 (87 M) } Module: secfilter { ... Total: 768 } Module: exec { ... Total: 16 } Module: dispatcher { ... Total: 2992 } Module: cfgutils { ... Total: 48 } Module: app_python3 { ... Total: 32 } So, I'm guessing, where all the memory gone? Is there any way to get more detailed info on SHM? Kamailio 5.8.2 -- Thanks in advance, Ihor

2 6

Not responding to OPTIONS if existing tcp connection
by Jon Bonilla (Manwe) 22 Jul '24

22 Jul '24

Hi all version 5.7.6 Debian 12 I'm having issues with a kamailio server not sending 200 to some OPTIONS requests. It does send 200 to some subscribers but not 100% of the time to 100% of subs. I have enabled debug=3 in that server and this is what I found: If the log says that it found existing tcp connection and it's reusing it I can't see the 200ok in a sngrep capture. Example: <core> [core/receive.c:126]: sip_check_fline(): first line indicates a SIP reply <core> [core/tcp_main.c:1722]: _tcpconn_find(): found connection by id: 2 <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2614]: tcpconn_send_put(): send from reader (360359 (18)), reusing fd <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2845]: tcpconn_do_send(): sending... <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2881]: tcpconn_do_send(): after real write: c= 0x7fb0faa893d8 n=384 fd=14 <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2882]: tcpconn_do_send(): buf=#012SIP/2.0 200 Keepalive#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.35.190.105:5060;branch=z9hG4bK15ebf764;rport=55894;received=1.1.1.186#015#012From: "Unknown" <sip:contesta01@10.35.190.105>;tag=as5311c3a7#015#012To: <sip: 1.1.1.138>;tag=054524a74bcccf444a0f08f67c5b7657.d07b5401#015#012Call-ID: 15dcd38c46f915576ded132a11d8ff4c@10.35.190.105:5060#015#012CSeq: 102 OPTIONS#015#012Server: aaa SBC#015#012Content-Length: 0#015#012#015#012 <core> [core/receive.c:531]: receive_msg(): request-route executed in: 302 usec On the other side, if kamailio doesn't find an existing tcp connection (at least nothing in the logs about that) I can see the 200 ok in sngrep. Example: <core> [core/receive.c:126]: sip_check_fline(): first line indicates a SIP reply <core> [core/receive.c:531]: receive_msg(): request-route executed in: 295 usec All subs use tcp. And the kamailio.cfg is very simple regarding OPTIONS: Sanity, check maxfwd and sl_send_reply(200). Any hints? cheers, Jon -- PekePBX, the multitenant PBX solution https://pekepbx.com

2 1

Drouting using TLS and domain names
by SAMUEL MOYA TINOCO 19 Jul '24

19 Jul '24

Hi everyone, I'm trying to configure drouting module but i'm not sure how to configure dr_gateways table to use domain names and TLS instead of IPs How should I do it? In dispatcher module is by using sips:domain but when I configure it like this I have problems to send invites (maybe I'm doing something wrong). Does anyone know how to configure it? Thanks in advance for your help Samuel Moya Tinoco Departamento de Sistemas y Redes Móvil: (+34) 606985997 smoya(a)vivelibre.es<mailto:smoya@vivelibre.es> [cid:image001.png@01DAD156.D8CFF170] Soluciones inteligentes para la autonomía personal

2 3

Possible Kamailio memmory leak - version 5.8.2
by Vanderlei Torres Batistela 18 Jul '24

18 Jul '24

Hello all, I am using a very simple scritp with corex module enabled . Normal calls works fine, but a scenario where INVITE does not receive response and the call is released with SIP 408 (request timeout) leads to memmory leak. I verified it making a lot of calls with this scenario and printing the shared memory (using kamcmd core.shmmem) . Its ocurred with modparam("corex", "nio_intercept", 1). If I modify to modparam("corex", "nio_intercept", 0) the memmory leak does not ocurr anymore. The problem also occurs in another scenario where the SIP Cancel message is not responded to. My script has this event route # event route event_route[network:msg] { xlog("L_INFO", "Dentro do Event_Route \n"); if (is_incoming()) { xlog("L_INFO", "Received message '$mb' \n"); $avp(msg) = $mb; xinfo("avp(msg) = $avp(msg)"); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "Sending message '$mb' \n"); $avp(msg) = $mb; }; } Test done wtih 4000 calls: [root@labcom070 kamailio]# kamctl stats shmem { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": [ "shmem:fragments = 900", "shmem:free_size = 6180368", "shmem:max_used_size = 66980272", "shmem:real_used_size = 60928496", "shmem:total_size = 67108864", "shmem:used_size = 54884944" ], "id": 393115 } [root@labcom070 kamailio]# kamcmd mod.stats all shm Module: core { create_avp(178): 52257504 counters_prefork_init(211): 53760 cfg_clone_str(132): 112 cfg_shmize(221): 832 main_loop(1381): 16 init_pt(104): 16 init_pt(103): 16 init_pt(102): 6224 cfg_register_ctx(47): 96 init_tcp(5197): 8192 init_tcp(5191): 32768 init_tcp(5182): 16 init_tcp(5175): 16 init_tcp(5167): 16 init_tcp(5161): 16 init_tcp(5149): 16 init_avps(92): 16 init_avps(91): 16 init_dst_blocklist(435): 16384 init_dst_blocklist(427): 16 timer_alloc(494): 96 init_dns_cache(368): 16 init_dns_cache(359): 16384 init_dns_cache(351): 16 init_dns_cache(343): 16 init_timer(264): 16 init_timer(263): 16384 init_timer(262): 16 init_timer(261): 16 init_timer(250): 16 init_timer(218): 16 init_timer(207): 278544 init_timer(206): 16 init_timer(194): 16 cfg_child_cb_new(832): 64 sr_cfg_init(371): 16 sr_cfg_init(364): 16 sr_cfg_init(356): 16 sr_cfg_init(344): 16 sr_cfg_init(332): 16 ksr_shutdown_phase_init(123): 16 rpc_hash_add(118): 16 qm_shm_lock_init(1463): 16 Total: 52687808 } I attached my kamailio script used and a log with one call using the command "kamcmd corex.shm_summary" with modparam("corex", "nio_intercept", 1) and modparam("corex", "nio_intercept", 0) Regards, Vanderlei

3 6

Re: Difference betwwen TM functions in KEMI
by Duarte Rocha 18 Jul '24

18 Jul '24

Hello Alex, You're totally right, that was the issue. Thank you so much for the help. Helpful as always. Cheers, Duarte Rocha

1 0

Difference betwwen TM functions in KEMI
by Duarte Rocha 17 Jul '24

17 Jul '24

Hello all, I'm using Kamailio with native script and KEMI in Javascript. I noticed that functions from the TM module can have different results if I call them on KEMI or Native script. Is this intended behaviour? Don't they share the state? In order to test this i made the following code : KEMI Code : function ksr_request_route() { try{ if ( KSR.is_method("BYE") ) { print.error("BYE Request KEMI BYE") KSR.route("exists_test") if(KSR.tm.t_exists()) { print.error("KEMI : Transaction exists") } else { print.error("KEMI : Transaction does not exist") } Native Code : route[exists_test] { if( t_exists()) { xerr("Native Script : Transaction exists \n"); } else { xerr("Native Script : Transaction does not exist \n"); } } I've also tried to change function call order but every time I get "Transaction does not exist" on native and "Transaction Exists" on KEMI. Is this intended behaviour? Should I only call tm functions in native or Kemi in order to have consistency ? Thanks in advance, Best Regards,

2 1

Dns record not alone?
by Pyry Aaltonen 17 Jul '24

17 Jul '24

Hi, I recently updated my testing env to 5.8.1 and after that I’ve been receiving dns_cache.c warning “record not alone”. I found out that it’s been added to quite recent commit: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/d8a35b3b6c837b36779e232b65fce61… And that’s probably the why I haven’t seen it before. As far as I know, I have no other problem with dns or anything else than the warning appearing in the logs 😊 I can’t quite get what the warning is about? Clearly refers to dns queries, and with debug I found out that maybe its somehow related to ip which has several domains to pointing it (and queried by one of those domains by this kamailio). Can it be something with the PTR-record? And this warning comes ones every hour, so probably when some ttl expires, and meanwhile the cache is ok with the situation. And as a background, I haven’t done any specific dns-configurations in my config, so settings should be pretty much in defaults. Any advice what I should fix here to get the warning disappear? -Pyry

2 1

Add a Header to CANCEL request
by sadik.oualla.mohamed＠gmail.com 17 Jul '24

17 Jul '24

Hello all, I am facing an issue with Kamailio when trying to add custom headers to CANCEL requests. My current configuration adds the "Reason" header perfectly: ``` if(!is_present_hf("Reason")){ $var(cause_request) = 31; append_hf("Reason: Q.850;cause=$var(cause_request)\r\n", "CSeq"); msg_apply_changes(); } ``` However, when I attempt to add headers like "X-Reason" or "TestHeader", they are not added: ``` if(!is_present_hf("Reason")){ $var(cause_request) = 31; append_hf("X-Reason: Q.850;cause=$var(cause_request)\r\n", "CSeq"); # or append_hf("TestHeader: Q.850;cause=$var(cause_request)\r\n", "CSeq"); msg_apply_changes(); #nothing changes in the relayed CANCEL request :-/ } ``` I've read in this discussion "https://lists.kamailio.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/sr-users@lists.kamailio…" that this might work if sending CANCEL in stateless mode, but I want to keep it stateful. Any suggestions on how to achieve this? Regards, Mohamed.

1 0

Changing ksr_tcp_accept_iplimit from default 1024
by Who AmI 16 Jul '24

16 Jul '24

Hi list, I hope you are all well? I am currently loadtesting some services internally and I am getting an odd error around TCP connections from the same source IP below: "/usr/sbin/kamailio[1806789]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:4459]: handle_new_connect(): hit the limit of connections per source IP (my_ip:39043) - rejecting" Its from the core the error so I was looking at the cookbooks and documentation but cannot get around this specific limit or find a configuration to tweak that fixes it. The limit only affects TCP (will affect TLS as well but I haven't got that far) and is 1024 it seems. Kamailio version is: 5.7.6 OS: Ubuntu 22.04 Things I have done so far: I have set limitNOFILE=65535 in the service file Set the tcp/tls_max_connections at 8192 (default is 2048) Increase the tcp_rd_buf_size to 16k+ The service I am using to loadtest is SIPp with flags "-t tn" for TCP multisocket as this service will have much more than 1024 concurrent TCP connections to it from a single source IP. I think I have missed something basic here as the devel and the source code references: "ksr_tcp_accept_iplimit" here at line 541: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/main.c#L541 I cannot find a way to change this with a configuration line it seems, am I being blind or is my only option to build from source and change this? Many Thanks, John.

2 2

Weird telephone-event payload issue - need help
by Tim Bowyer 16 Jul '24

16 Jul '24

Hello Everyone, I've been grappling with this issue for some months, time to raise the white flag. Essentially I need to work out a way to configure Kamailio/RTPengine to normalise telephone-events to 101 earlier in the piece. 1. Call comes in from Carrier with INVITE w/SDP, telephone-event payload of 96. 2. INVITE sent to Asterisk with the same SDP, payload = 96 3. INVITE sent from Asterisk to Client with payload = 101 * 200 OK w/SDP from Client has payload = 101 * 200 OK w/SDP to Kamailio has payload = 96 * 200 OK w/SDP to Carrier has payload = 96 4. Asterisk (with Direct Media enabled) sends INVITE to Kamailio with payload = 96, and new media IP of Client 5. Kamailio passes this onto Carrier with media IP of RTPengine 6. 200 OK w/SDP from Carrier has payload = 96 sent to Kamailio 7. Kamailio passes this 200 OK to Asterisk, which responds with ACK and doesn't do anything further +---------+ +----------+ +---------+ +---------+ | Carrier | <----1-----> | Kamailio | <-----2----> | Asterisk| <----3------>| Client | | | | | | | | | +---------+ +----------+ +---------+ +---------+ ^ | | | | | |3| | | | | | +------5---------> +-----------+ <-----------------+------------4-----------+ | RTPengine | +-----------+ Big issue is, the Client is expecting telephone-events with a payload of 101, whereas RTPengine is passing it 96 from the Carrier. * Inbound DTMF only works at client-side if Asterisk stays in path (far from ideal). * The issue is exacerbated when calls are sent back out to the same or another carrier (forward scenario). * There's nothing I can seem to do in Asterisk to change how it handles DTMF in a direct media/re-invite setting. Any ideas? Cheers, Tim Bowyer

3 12

how to upgrade kamailio minor release from 5.7.5 to 5.7.6
by sadik.oualla.mohamed＠gmail.com 15 Jul '24

15 Jul '24

I am currently using Kamailio version 5.7.5, which I installed from the source code. I would like to upgrade to version 5.7.6 but have been unable to find documentation specifically addressing minor upgrades between these minor releases. I have found only wikis detailing the process for upgrading for major releases (like 5.7.x to 5.8.0). Could you please point me to the documentation for my current need or share with me steps on how to perform this minor upgrade? Thank you. Cheers.

3 4

How to get the rtpengine IP used by the current call among multiple rtpengines
by mm e 15 Jul '24

15 Jul '24

modparam("rtpengine", "rtpengine_sock","udp:192.168.1.3:12221=2 udp:192.168.1.1:12222=1 udp:192.168.1.5:12221=7") When rtpengine_sock is set to multiple rtproxies mode, how to get the id or ip of the rtpengine used in the current call? There is no information returned which rtpengine

1 0

How to get the id or ip in the multiple rtproxies for LB with weights。
by mm e 15 Jul '24

15 Jul '24

modparam("rtpengine", "rtpengine_sock","udp:192.168.1.3:12221=2 udp:192.168.1.1:12222=1 udp:192.168.1.5:12221=7") When rtpengine_sock is set to multiple rtproxies mode, how to get the id or ip of the rtpengine used in the current call? There is no information returned which rtpengine kamailio selected for the call.

1 0

Re: (no subject)
by Sergio Charrua 12 Jul '24

12 Jul '24

Hi Brett! From what I could understand, my client (a Carrier) assigns services and products to its customers identified by trunkgroups (depending on the customer and the service requested, as well as the ingress trunkgroup the call will be forwarded to a specific egress trunkgroup). . The INVITE is sent by customer to the SBC (ingress), where some kind of process (which i have no details) will decide what IP:Port to forward the messages to Kamailio with additional infos (Kamailio is listening on different NICs/IPs/Ports). Then, Kamailio will check on the (external) routing engine the route to take and forwards to the outbound endpoint. Depending on the IP:Port that Kamailio receives the call (SBC may choose one NIC or the other) the request is then received by Kamailio and verified/processed by the routing engine replying back to kamailio with the route to take, and then Kamailio forwards to the outbound endpoint (egress SBC...). It is a bit confusing, and I want to simplify things as much as possible, but apparently the old/current solution is set this way and they pretend to keep the new solution as similar as possible to the old/current solution. This is mostly due to the billing process, which is very (overly?) complex and they do not pretend to change it. IMHO, the routing engine should be much simpler but it is a much more complex process the Carrier currently has...and wishes to keep. (sorry for posting without a subject. I did, however, re-posted with corrected subject) Atenciosamente / Kind Regards / Cordialement, *Sérgio Charrua* On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 8:11 PM Brett Nemeroff <brett(a)voicefoxtelephony.com> wrote: > Is there a reason you have to identify the trunk group based on received > IP/Port? I've seen this as a requirement from some more antiquated systems > and it's always a pain. It's always better to use source IP or even a trunk > prefix (dialed number prefix) which isn't really secure, but works when > security isn't an issue. > > If you have to do it that way, I'd probably turn the $Ri/$Rp into some > sort of cache key like $Ri_$Rp and map it to something like a dispatcher > setid. > > There may be a more modern way to do this, but I don't think there is. > > Good luck! > -Brett > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 1:40 PM Sergio Charrua via sr-users < > sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> wrote: > >> Hi all! >> >> for a project under development, one requirement is to be able to >> forward/relay the call to a specific destination depending on which IP >> Address and Port the call was received by Kamailio. >> This also means that Kamailio will be listening on multiple IP Address >> and Ports >> listen=udp:IP_1:port_1 # trunkgroup 1 >> listen=udp:IP_2:port_2 # trunkgroup 2 >> listen=udp:IP_3:port_3 # trunkgroup 3 >> >> I know the pv $Ri and $Rp can be used to identify from which IP address >> and port the message reached Kamailio and having those details, depending >> on the value, I can define some conditions that allows Kamailio to relay >> the call to different destination endpoints. >> For example: >> - calls from +32 to + 39 received on trunkgroup1 needs to go to Italy SBC >> address A.B.C.D >> - but calls from +32 to +39 received on trunkgroup2 need to go to Germany >> on SBC address 1.2.3.4 (as it is cheaper) >> >> Is there a better way of doing this without using IF/THEN/ELSE or SWITCH >> blocks and "hard code" destination SBC addresses? >> I have read the DRouting module's documentation but not sure if it could >> help and how... >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> >> >> Atenciosamente / Kind Regards / Cordialement, >> >> >> *Sérgio * >> __________________________________________________________ >> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >> To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org >> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to >> the sender! >> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >> > > > -- > > ======================================================== > Brett Nemeroff > Voice Fox Telephony LLC > Office: 512-670-8369 > Email: brett(a)voicefoxtelephony.com >

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users