sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

37 participants
37510 discussions

htable: autoexpire vs updatedelete
by Дилян Палаузов 06 Feb '23

06 Feb '23

Hello, https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/htable#htable.p.htable says for modparam('htable', 'htable', '…autoexpire … updateexpire…') autoexpire -time in seconds to delete an item from a hash table if no update was done to it. If is missing or set to 0, the items won't expire. updateexpire - if set to 1 (default), the time until expiration of an item is reset when that item is updated. Certain uses of htable may dictate that updates should not reset the expiration timeout, however, in which case this attribute can be set to 0. My reading is that, when a value is updated and autoexpire is positive, autoexpire will reset the timer, but updateexpire may or may not reset the same timer. That is: modparam('htable', 'htable', 'a=>autoexpire=5;updatedelete=1') modparam('htable', 'htable', 'b=>autoexpire=5;updatedelete=0') If b was not updated for 5s, will it be removed, as the documentation for autoxpire suggests, irrespective of updatedelete? Greetings Dilyan

2 2

Depending on topoh.mask_key Kamailio either cannot parse RURIs or reads invalid data
by Дилян Палаузов 06 Feb '23

06 Feb '23

Hello, when I use dns_try_naptr=on corelog=-1 debug=-1 enable_tls=yes use_dns_cache=off dns_cache_init=off modparam("topoh", "mask_key", "TEAI32l)- eauiDEUIA!?()") and run Kamailio under valgrind, Kamailio logs: 20(21) ERROR: kemix [kemix_mod.c:229]: ki_kx_get_ruri_attr(): failed to parse the R-URI 20(21) ERROR: rr [loose.c:1011]: loose_route_mode(): failed to parse Request URI The workflow is: I start Kamailio. A UDP-client registers. Then a websocket client calls the UDP-client. Finally the websocket client hangs up. Valgrind does not report anything suspicious. When I use instead modparam("topoh", "mask_key", "TEAI32l") for the same workflow, with the same configuration, valgrind logs: ==14== Invalid read of size 4 ==14== at 0x4867E5: atomic_cmpxchg_int (atomic_x86.h:224) ==14== by 0x486830: futex_get (futexlock.h:99) ==14== by 0x490CE4: dns_hash_get (dns_cache.c:673) ==14== by 0x4972A6: dns_get_entry (dns_cache.c:2001) ==14== by 0x499288: dns_srv_get_he (dns_cache.c:2455) ==14== by 0x597AAD: no_naptr_srv_sip_resolvehost (resolve.c:1599) ==14== by 0x598332: naptr_sip_resolvehost (resolve.c:1675) ==14== by 0x5983C5: _sip_resolvehost (resolve.c:1707) ==14== by 0x49943B: dns_srv_sip_resolvehost (dns_cache.c:2516) ==14== by 0x49B3DD: dns_sip_resolvehost (dns_cache.c:2738) ==14== by 0x59846A: sip_hostport2su (resolve.c:1727) ==14== by 0x4CB951: forward_request (forward.c:515) ==14== by 0x99993CD: t_relay_to (t_funcs.c:300) ==14== by 0x99EBA32: _w_t_relay_to (tm.c:1764) ==14== by 0x99F4DEB: ki_t_relay (tm.c:2917) ==14== by 0xA80A94B: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex (app_lua_api.c:1022) ==14== by 0xA81237D: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func (app_lua_api.c:1706) ==14== by 0xA81B93F: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_209 (app_lua_kemi_export.c:1717) ==14== by 0xA8383C0: luaD_precall (in /lib64/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so) ==14== by 0xA84C4CA: luaV_execute (in /lib64/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so) ==14== by 0xA838C90: luaD_callnoyield (in /lib64/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so) ==14== by 0xA837029: luaD_rawrunprotected (in /lib64/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so) ==14== by 0xA8391DF: luaD_pcall (in /lib64/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so) ==14== by 0xA8333DE: lua_pcallk (in /lib64/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so) ==14== by 0xA806F0C: app_lua_run_ex (app_lua_api.c:773) ==14== by 0xA825F06: sr_kemi_config_engine_lua (app_lua_mod.c:119) ==14== by 0x5048BE: sr_kemi_route (kemi.c:3784) ==14== by 0x588909: receive_msg (receive.c:502) ==14== by 0xA609ADF: ws_frame_receive (ws_frame.c:644) ==14== by 0x4BCAAB: sr_event_exec (events.c:299) ==14== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd ==14== ==14== ==14== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV): dumping core ==14== Access not within mapped region at address 0x0 ==14== at 0x4867E5: atomic_cmpxchg_int (atomic_x86.h:224) ==14== by 0x486830: futex_get (futexlock.h:99) ==14== by 0x490CE4: dns_hash_get (dns_cache.c:673) ==14== by 0x4972A6: dns_get_entry (dns_cache.c:2001) ==14== by 0x499288: dns_srv_get_he (dns_cache.c:2455) ==14== by 0x597AAD: no_naptr_srv_sip_resolvehost (resolve.c:1599) ==14== by 0x598332: naptr_sip_resolvehost (resolve.c:1675) ==14== by 0x5983C5: _sip_resolvehost (resolve.c:1707) ==14== by 0x49943B: dns_srv_sip_resolvehost (dns_cache.c:2516) ==14== by 0x49B3DD: dns_sip_resolvehost (dns_cache.c:2738) ==14== by 0x59846A: sip_hostport2su (resolve.c:1727) ==14== by 0x4CB951: forward_request (forward.c:515) ==14== by 0x99993CD: t_relay_to (t_funcs.c:300) ==14== by 0x99EBA32: _w_t_relay_to (tm.c:1764) ==14== by 0x99F4DEB: ki_t_relay (tm.c:2917) ==14== by 0xA80A94B: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex (app_lua_api.c:1022) ==14== by 0xA81237D: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func (app_lua_api.c:1706) ==14== by 0xA81B93F: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_209 (app_lua_kemi_export.c:1717) ==14== by 0xA8383C0: luaD_precall (in /lib64/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so) ==14== by 0xA84C4CA: luaV_execute (in /lib64/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so) ==14== by 0xA838C90: luaD_callnoyield (in /lib64/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so) ==14== by 0xA837029: luaD_rawrunprotected (in /lib64/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so) ==14== by 0xA8391DF: luaD_pcall (in /lib64/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so) ==14== by 0xA8333DE: lua_pcallk (in /lib64/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so) ==14== by 0xA806F0C: app_lua_run_ex (app_lua_api.c:773) ==14== by 0xA825F06: sr_kemi_config_engine_lua (app_lua_mod.c:119) ==14== by 0x5048BE: sr_kemi_route (kemi.c:3784) ==14== by 0x588909: receive_msg (receive.c:502) ==14== by 0xA609ADF: ws_frame_receive (ws_frame.c:644) ==14== by 0x4BCAAB: sr_event_exec (events.c:299) The stacktrace with the values of the variables is available at https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3350 . Or at least these things seem very similar to me. Any idea? I can share the OCI-image and the full configuration. Greetings Дилян

3 4

topoh: th_mask_decode (th_mask_encode (x)) ≠ x
by Дилян Палаузов 06 Feb '23

06 Feb '23

Hello, after receiving INVITE sip:test-gnome-calls@bapha.be SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/WSS bapha.be;branch=z9hG4bK974100 Max-Forwards: 70 To: <sip:test-gnome-calls@bapha.be> From: "Online https://sip.bapha.be" <sip:online@bapha.be>;tag=12q2efc423 Call-ID: fkhe8faq0fh80glmq59i CSeq: 5622 INVITE Contact: <sip:4q5ne5no@bapha.be;transport=ws;ob> Allow: ACK,CANCEL,INVITE,MESSAGE,BYE,OPTIONS,INFO,NOTIFY,REFER Supported: outbound User-Agent: SIP.js/0.7.8 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 1964 v=0 o=mozilla...THIS_IS_SDPARTA-99.0 8263261229339246488 0 IN IP4 0.0.0.0 s=- … kamailio calls th_mask_encode( char *in = "sip:test-gnome-calls@bapha.be;gr=urn:uuid:f2f5a3cf-a0fb-0047-be50- 740fb9bdc562;alias=87.118.146.153~60722~2>;+sip.instance=\"<urn:uuid:f2f5a3cf-a0fb-0047-be50- 740fb9bdc562>";+org.linphone.specs=\"conference/1.0,ephemeral/1.1,groupchat/1.1,groupchat/1.2,lime\n"\ "Content-Type: application/sdp and so on", int ilen = 107, str prefix = { .len = 23, .s ="sip:127.3.4.84;line=sr-" }, int *olen). It returns olen=167, and the string "sip:127.3.4.84;line=sr- if7s1mg7i36PNf0AbdwPpfzlbqWEpLzsSGItpLwyN39ZMY4t1mCTSd6DNo4LWdIOpfpPp5FLpUQscX63Kd47W5EPWO6sNL90pLgoW5p-1fzlSdzO25n3KoIk1vHkWXptc5wOeopsWO9-eo9*". Then Kamailio forwards (sends): Contact: <sip:127.3.4.84;line=sr-if7s1mg7i36PNf0AbdwPpfzlbqWEpLzsSGItpLwyN39ZMY4t1mCTSd6DNo4LWdIOpfpPp5FLpUQscX63Kd47W5EPWO6sNL90pLgoW5p- 1fzlSdzO25n3KoIk1vHkWXptc5wOeopsWO9-eo9*>;+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:f2f5a3cf-a0fb-0047-be50- 740fb9bdc562>";+org.linphone.specs="conference/1.0,ephemeral/1.1,groupchat/1.1,groupchat/1.2,lime" which at some point leads to ACK sip:127.3.4.84;line=sr-if7s1mg7i36pnf0abdwppfzlbqweplzssgitplwyn39zmy4t1mctsd6dno4lwdiopfppp5flpuqscx63kd47w5epwo6snl90plgow5p- 1fzlsdzo25n3koik1vhkwxptc5woeopswo9-eo9* SIP/2.0 and BYE sip:127.3.4.84;line=sr-if7s1mg7i36pnf0abdwppfzlbqweplzssgitplwyn39zmy4t1mctsd6dno4lwdiopfppp5flpuqscx63kd47w5epwo6snl90plgow5p- 1fzlsdzo25n3koik1vhkwxptc5woeopswo9-eo9* SIP/2.0 Below you can find th_test.c . The functions th_mask_encode() and th_mask_decode() there are identical to the same functions in src/modules/topoh/th_mask.c . main() provides some tests: Passing «sip:test-gnome-calls@bapha.be;gr=urn:uuid:f2f5a3cf-a0fb-0047-be50- 740fb9bdc562;alias=87.118.146.153~60472~2>;+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:f2f5a3cf-a0fb-0047-be50- 740fb9bdc562>";+org.linphone.specs="conference/1.0,ephemeral/1.1,groupchat/1.1,groupchat/1.2,lime» to th_mask_encode() returns sip:127.3.4.84;line=sr-if7s1mg7i36PNf0AbdwPpfzlbqWEpLzsSGItpLwyN39ZMY4t1mCTSd6DNo4LWdIOpfpPp5FLpUQscX63Kd47W5EPWO6sNL90pLgoW5p- 1fzlSdzO25n3KoIk1vHkWXptc5wOeopsWXi-eo9* (this is what Kamailio does send out). Passing the last string to th_mask_decode() returns sip:test-gnome-calls@bapha.be;gr=urn:uuid:f2f5a3cf-a0fb-0047-be50-740fb9bdc562;alias=87.118.1 the ;alias= is incomplete, compared to the origin. The above ACK leads to passing "sr-if7s1mg7i36pnf0abdwppfzlbqweplzssgitplwyn39zmy4t1mctsd6dno4lwdiopfppp5flpuqscx63kd47w5epwo6snl90plgow5p-1fzlsdzo25n3koik1vhkwxptc5woeopswo9-eo9* SIP/2.0\n"\ "Route: <sip:Q+L06HX94DMPtQWQTI5OE8SQTI5O4MY=@144.76.142.78;transport=ws;r2=on;lr;nat=yes>\n"\ "Route: <sip:127.3.4.84;line=sr-if7s17IB5XEfVzn0WIgWwqggCTzwV5C2g5R5wCg4WwrQ5CuZ6XIQWvH3WUHkWX9tWOnyMq4RbmWsb34Q2YgoiXP-coTAboPlioPtpY6Z8dCO>\n"\ to th_mask_decode() and the result is callub.p.b;rn:s.d2lQg#cfa=bA07beQ7R409bcQ62;alac=87718*1P.15#~60R22~2 with the dots being unprintable characters. (result is garbage). I have seen that callub.p.b in the unparsable R-URI reports from Kamailio. That is an indication that th_mask_decode() does not decode the Contact encoded by th_mask_encode() correctly. Valgrind does not report improper memory usage. Greetings Dilyan gcc -g -o th-test ./th-test.c && ./th-test th-test.c #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #define TH_EB64I \ "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789.-" char _th_EB64[65] = "EFvXIzGq94xKcW126gV5wCdYpNSbiM8enRUou7LmhajBlPtAsk-OQTf3H0DyrZ.J"; int _th_DB64[256]; char *_th_PD64 = "*"; struct str_ { char* s; /**< Pointer to the first character of the string */ int len; /**< Length of the string */ }; typedef struct str_ str; str prefix = { .len = 23, .s ="sip:127.3.4.84;line=sr-" }; char* th_mask_encode(char *in, int ilen, const str *prefix, int *olen); char* th_mask_decode(char *in, int ilen, const str *prefix, int extra, int *olen); char* th_mask_encode(char *in, int ilen, const str *prefix, int *olen) { char *out; int left; int idx; int i; int r; char *p; int block; *olen = (((ilen+2)/3)<<2) + ((prefix!=NULL&&prefix->len>0)?prefix->len:0); out = (char*)malloc((*olen+1)*sizeof(char)); if(out==NULL) { fprintf(stderr, "malloc error\n"); *olen = 0; return NULL; } memset(out, 0, (*olen+1)*sizeof(char)); if(prefix!=NULL&&prefix->len>0) memcpy(out, prefix->s, prefix->len); p = out + (int)((prefix!=NULL&&prefix->len>0)?prefix->len:0); for(idx=0; idx<ilen; idx+=3) { left = ilen - idx - 1 ; left = (left>1)?2:left; block = 0; for(i=0, r=16; i<=left; i++, r-=8) block += ((unsigned char)in[idx+i]) << r; *(p++) = _th_EB64[(block >> 18) & 0x3f]; *(p++) = _th_EB64[(block >> 12) & 0x3f]; *(p++) = (left>0)?_th_EB64[(block >> 6) & 0x3f]:_th_PD64[0]; *(p++) = (left>1)?_th_EB64[block & 0x3f]:_th_PD64[0]; } return out; } char* th_mask_decode(char *in, int ilen, const str *prefix, int extra, int *olen) { char *out; int n; int block; int idx; int i; int j; int end; char c; for(n=0,i=ilen-1; in[i]==_th_PD64[0]; i--) n++; *olen = (((ilen-((prefix!=NULL&&prefix->len>0)?prefix->len:0)) * 6) >> 3) - n; if (*olen<=0) { return NULL; } out = (char*)malloc((*olen+1+extra)*sizeof(char)); if(out==NULL) { fprintf(stderr, "malloc error\n"); *olen = 0; return NULL; } memset(out, 0, (*olen+1+extra)*sizeof(char)); end = ilen - n; i = (prefix!=NULL&&prefix->len>0)?prefix->len:0; for(idx=0; i<end; idx+=3) { block = 0; for(j=0; j<4 && i<end ; j++) { c = _th_DB64[(int)in[i++]]; if(c<0) { free(out); *olen = 0; return NULL; } block += c << (18 - 6*j); } for(j=0, n=16; j<3 && idx+j< *olen; j++, n-=8) out[idx+j] = (char)((block >> n) & 0xff); } return out; } int main() { //this is from th_mask_init for(int i=0; i<256; i++) _th_DB64[i] = -1; for(int i=0; i<64; i++) _th_DB64[(int)_th_EB64[i]] = i; int olen, o2; char *end; char *input = "sip:test-gnome-calls@bapha.be;gr=urn:uuid:f2f5a3cf-a0fb-0047-be50- 740fb9bdc562;alias=87.118.146.153~60472~2>;+sip.instance=\"<urn:uuid:f2f5a3cf-a0fb-0047-be50- 740fb9bdc562>\";+org.linphone.specs=\"conference/1.0,ephemeral/1.1,groupchat/1.1,groupchat/1.2,lime\""; printf("input=[%s]\n", input); char* middle = th_mask_encode (input, 107, &prefix, &olen); printf("olen = %i, middle=[%s]\n", olen, middle); end = th_mask_decode(middle, 147, &prefix, 0, &o2); printf("o2 = %i, end=[%s]\n", o2, end); char * b1 = "sr-if7s1mg7i36pnf0abdwppfzlbqweplzssgitplwyn39zmy4t1mctsd6dno4lwdiopfppp5flpuqscx63kd47w5epwo6snl90plgow5p- 1fzlsdzo25n3koik1vhkwxptc5woeopswo9-eo9*"; o2 = 0; end = th_mask_decode(b1, 147, &prefix, 0, &o2); printf("o2 = %i, end=[%s]\n", o2, end); char* b2 = "sr-if7s1mg7i36pnf0abdwppfzlbqweplzssgitplwyn39zmy4t1mctsd6dno4lwdiopfppp5flpuqscx63kd47w5epwo6snl90plgow5p-1fzlsdzo25n3koik1vhkwxptc5woeopswo9-eo9* SIP/2.0\n"\ "Route: <sip:Q+L06HX94DMPtQWQTI5OE8SQTI5O4MY=@144.76.142.78;transport=ws;r2=on;lr;nat=yes>\n"\ "Route: <sip:127.3.4.84;line=sr-if7s17IB5XEfVzn0WIgWwqggCTzwV5C2g5R5wCg4WwrQ5CuZ6XIQWvH3WUHkWX9tWOnyMq4RbmWsb34Q2YgoiXP-coTAboPlioPtpY6Z8dCO>\n"\ "Via: SIP/2.0/WSS bapha.be;branch=z9hG4bK9069155\n"\ "Max-Forwards: 70\n"\ "To: <sip:test-gnome-calls@bapha.be>;tag=Pn4npAj\n"\ "From: \"Online https://sip.bapha.be\" <sip:online@bapha.be>;tag=12q2efc423\n"\ "Call-ID: fkhe8faq0fh80glmq59i\n"\ "CSeq: 5623 ACK\n"\ "Supported: outbound\n"\ "User-Agent: SIP.js/0.7.8\n"\ "Content-Length: 0\n"\ "\n"; o2 = 0; end = th_mask_decode(b2, 147, &prefix, 0, &o2); printf("o2 = %i, end=[%s]\n", o2, end); return 0; }

2 1

no autocomplete for kamcmd for latest debian packages
by Ovidiu Sas 04 Feb '23

04 Feb '23

Hello, The latest debian packages are built without autocomplete for kamcmd. Do we have the libreadline-dev package installed on the build machine? I know that we have kamctl rpc and kamcli, but if we are still shipping kamcmd, it should have the autocomplete feature enabled. Regards, Ovidiu Sas -- VoIP Embedded, Inc. http://www.voipembedded.com

3 2

Sip messages responses counters per interface
by Patrick Karton 02 Feb '23

02 Feb '23

2 1

rtpengine - SRTP <> RTP
by kdrewicz+kamailio＠cludo.pl 01 Feb '23

01 Feb '23

I try to workout if - currently it would work, or - where and how to debug more: I face - 2 interfacec - public internet (so, TLS + sRTP) is desired and private - old infrastructure - i mus only use plain RTP 172.23.9.70 - private ip - from this endpoint of kamailio and rtpengine should send only basic RTP 172.23.210.75:5060 private - target for kamailio 1.2.3.24 obfuscated public IP (TLS + sRTP required) kamailio 5.4.4 (x86_64/linux) rtpengine -v Version: 11.1.1.4-1~bpo11+1 all i do is: if (proto==TLS) { rtpengine_manage("RTP/AVP ICE=remove replace-session-connection replace-origin pad-crypto ptime=20 codec-transcode-PCMA record-call=on allow-transcoding direction=external direction=internal record-call=on"); } else if ($ru =~ "transport=tls") { rtpengine_manage("DTLS=on SRTP AVPF ICE=remove replace-session-connection replace-origin pad-crypto ptime=20 codec-transcode-PCMA record-call=on allow-transcoding direction=internal direction=external record-call=on media-address=1.2.3.24"); } # 1.2.3.24 obfuscated public IP 172.23.210.75:5060 is in dispatch.cfg, as '11' route[SBC_CORE] { append_hf("X-My-SRTP: removed31337\r\n"); ### i see this text in invtes from kamailio 172.23.9.70 towards 172.23.210.75:5060 ### i see only RTP, so as expected if (!ds_select_dst("11", "0")) { xwarn("I:$var(i) DROP(DOWN!) FWD:$rm [$fU->$tU] [SBCVIP] to $du\n"); sl_send_reply("503", "Destination down"); exit; } what i did: certificate is a paid one (the public party needs it) TLS works i deleted - entries in (not kamailo) cryptosuite that caused this: 13:08:05 localhost rtpengine[15140]: ERR: [51ad8758-b64d-4d2f-9fd0-41d03a38f74d]: [core] Failed to parse a=crypto attribute, ignoring: unknown crypto suite Tried to search for any "ready" examples for this - only found old threads and - that this should be possible, but - no example for woking config. what i see: Jan 19 19:00:57 localhost rtpengine[17301]: DEBUG: [core] timer run time = 0.000038 sec Jan 19 19:00:58 localhost rtpengine[17301]: DEBUG: [core] timer run time = 0.000036 sec Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] Closing call due to timeout Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: DEBUG: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] Redis delete_async=0 Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] Final packet stats: Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] --- Tag 'JVR5LTs', created 60:00 ago for branch '' Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] --- subscribed to '' Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] --- subscription for '' Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] ------ Media #1 (audio over RTP/SAVP) using unknown codec Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] --------- Port 1.2.3.24:30136 <> 52.129.106.28:17030, SSRC 0, in 0 p, 0 b, 0 e, 3600 ts, out 0 p, 0 b, 0 e Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] --------- Port 1.2.3.24:30137 <> 52.129.106.28:17031 (RTCP), SSRC 0, in 0 p, 0 b, 0 e, 3600 ts, out 0 p, 0 b, 0 e Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] --- Tag '', created 60:00 ago for branch '' Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] --- subscribed to 'JVR5LTs' Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] --- subscription for 'JVR5LTs' Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] ------ Media #1 (audio over RTP/AVP) using unknown codec Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] --------- Port 172.23.9.70:30014 <> :0 , SSRC 0, in 0 p, 0 b, 0 e, 3600 ts, out 0 p, 0 b, 0 e Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] --------- Port 172.23.9.70:30015 <> :0 (RTCP), SSRC 0, in 0 p, 0 b, 0 e, 3600 ts, out 0 p, 0 b, 0 e Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: INFO: [c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265]: [core] Moved metadata file "/var/spool/rtpengine/tmp/rtpengine-meta-c17bab16-5eea-492e-b1c4-ac9387f3e265-7003946f152c6c8d.tmp" to "/var/spool/rtpengine/metadata" Jan 19 19:00:59 localhost rtpengine[17301]: DEBUG: [core] timer run time = 0.000828 sec Jan 19 19:01:00 localhost rtpengine[17301]: DEBUG: [core] timer run time = 0.000053 sec route(SBC_CORE); maybe any hint or - someone has working exmaple of kamailio config + rtpengine settings ? i use only userspace daemon rtp forwarding (this is a test, dont need any performance here) Thanks,

5 9

transport=ws causing kamailio to use wrong listen socket
by nathan.bruning＠talksome.com 31 Jan '23

31 Jan '23

Hi all, We're hitting an issue while integrating secure websockets in our existing SIP infrastructure using Kamailio. When the registration comes in, it causes an entry in our AOR table, with ";transport=ws" appended. When we want to send a message to this client (using t_relay), kamailio seems to take 'ws' as being *unsecure* websockets. In turn, this makes Kamailio try to send out the message using a TCP listener - while it should have picked the TLS listener. There are some remarks in the sources about ws vs. wss, so i'm struggling to figure out where things go wrong. I've also created github issue #3340 with more details. Any help would be appreciated. If this turns out to be a Kamailio bug, i'm happy to provide a patch.

6 7

How can I setup Kamailio for failover on LCR ?
by scramatte 31 Jan '23

31 Jan '23

Hello, How can I setup Kamailio for failover on LCR ? Currently my Kamailio 4.x works with lcr but doesn’t care about gateway status. I mean that if a gateway match rule , it sends the call through without check if the gateway is available an never try the next one if the first fail. I’ve tried to implement inactivate_gw() But I received error that lcr_id_avp is not defined. I’ve added the parameters to lcr module for Ping and enable defunc but I’m unable to get it working. By the way I ‘ve trad that defunct is not a good practice as hacker sending malformed sip header can throw down the gateway. So what is the good and working way to setup outbound call failover ? Regards Sebastien

1 0

Evapi Dispatcher 100% cpu.
by Sebastian Sastre 30 Jan '23

30 Jan '23

Hello We are currently using EVAPI to push messages into kamailio from a go app. For the most part ift works without problems, messages get delivered into the event route and we use it to update presence status. Recently we started noticing delays on the evapi processing. After 500 requests x min the pid corresponding to the EVAPI dispatcher gets pegged at 100% CPU and processing of requests starts slowing down until in some cases the connection just drops and we have to reconnect. After that pid drops, the dispatcher goes back to working. Unfortunately the error we get back is very generic and is not telling us much logger.go:39: ERR Handler returned error (write tcp 127.0.0.1:48448->127.0.0.1:8228: write: broken pipe) This only happens on prod servers and with high load which makes it hard to debug. There is no other slowness or increase of traffic or drop SIP traffic, only evapi dispatcher at 100% and the EVAPI workers on idle. Curious if anyone has run into this issue. We've tried different versions (5.4 , 5.5 and 5.6) and it happens on all of them. Any feedback appreciated ! Thanks !

2 1

Is preloading openssl_mutex_shared necessary for Kamailio 5.6 or is it not necessary?
by Дилян Палаузов 30 Jan '23

30 Jan '23

Hello, https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tls says: For OpenSSL (libssl) v1.1.x, it is required to preload 'openssl_mutex_shared' library shipped by Kamailio. For more details see 'src/modules/tls/utils/openssl_mutex_shared/README.md'. 'src/modules/tls/utils/openssl_mutex_shared/README.md says: **IMPORTANT: the workaround of using this preloaded shared library is no longer needed starting with Kamailio v5.3.0-pre1 (git master branch after September 14, 2019). The code of this shared library has been included in the core of Kamailio and the same behaviour is now achieved by default.** This is a shared library required as a short term workaround for using Kamailio with OpenSSL (libssl) v1.1. It has to be pre-loaded before starting Kamailio. In v1.1, libssl does not allow setting custom locking functions, using internally pthread mutexes and rwlocks, but they are not initialized with process shared option (PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED), which can result in blocking Kamailio worker processes. Is preloading openssl_mutex_shared necessary for Kamailio 5.6 or is it not necessary? If it is not necessary, why isn’t it removed from the source code? Greetings Дилян

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users