sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

9 participants
37525 discussions

[serusers]: trusted table(permissions module)
by Kamal.Mann＠t-systems.com 02 Nov '06

02 Nov '06

Hi All I made an entry "10.25.119.156, any, ^sip:.*$" into trusted table so that any packet sent from 10.25.119.156 would be trusted by SER and don't ask for its credentials. But SER is replying 407- proxy auth needed!! After this I tried with permissions.allow file: "ALL : "sip:mann@imsfw.de$"" but still no progress same response from SER. My ser.cfg entries: modparam("permissions", "db_mode", 1) modparam("permissions", "trusted_table", "trusted") modparam("permissions", "source_col", "src_ip") modparam("permissions", "proto_col", "proto") modparam("permissions", "from_col", "from_pattern") modparam("permissions", "default_deny_file","/usr/lib/ser/modules/permissions.deny") modparam("permissions", "default_allow_file","/usr/lib/ser/modules/permissions.allow") Is it correct? Please give your suggestions for the same. Thanks in anticipation Kamal Mann

3 8

[Serusers] WARNING: rtpp_test: can't get version of the RTP proxy
by Ryan Churches 02 Nov '06

02 Nov '06

Im following "Getting Started with SER" and I'm stuck on the chapter about nat traversal Ive tried both methods, currently im working on rtpptoxy. the exact errors I get when i try to make calls from behind NAT are: 0(1731) WARNING: rtpp_test: can't get version of the RTP proxy 0(1731) WARNING: rtpp_test: support for RTP proxy has been disabled 0(1731) ERROR: force_rtp_proxy2: support for RTP proxy is disabled i have compiled and installed rtpproxy, and made sure the permissions were set. bmy bin # ps ax|grep rtp 1714 ? Ss 0:00 ./rtpproxy bmy bin # ls -la /var/run/rtpproxy.* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5 Nov 1 19:27 /var/run/rtpproxy.pid srwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Nov 1 19:27 /var/run/rtpproxy.sock i have attached my ser.cfg but below are some of the parts of it debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=no log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E) /* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode fork=no log_stderror=yes */ check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) listen=10.0.0.10 alias=hostname.dyndns.org port=6060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" fifo_db_url="mysql://user:pw@localhost/ser" <skip> modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock") <skip> route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= 2048 ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (method!="REGISTER") { record_route(); }; if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") { unforce_rtp_proxy(); } # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { if ((method=="INVITE" || method=="REFER") && !has_totag()) { sl_send_reply("403", "Forbidden"); break; }; if (method=="INVITE") { if (!proxy_authorize("","subscriber")) { proxy_challenge("","0"); break; }else if (!check_from()) { sl_send_reply("403", "Use From=ID"); break; }; consume_credentials(); if (nat_uac_test("19")) { setflag(6); force_rport(); fix_nated_contact(); }; force_rtp_proxy("l"); }; route(1); break; }; #======= call type processing section if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(4); route(1); break; }; if (method=="ACK") { route(1); break; } else if (method=="CANCEL") { route(1); break; } else if (method=="INVITE") { route(3); break; } else if (method=="REGISTER") { route(2); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (uri!=myself) { route(4); route(1); break; }; if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "User Not Found"); break; }; route(1); } route[1] { t_on_reply("1"); # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { if (method=="INVITE" || isflagset(6)) { unforce_rtp_proxy(); }; sl_reply_error(); }; } route[2] { #------------------------- #REGISTER Message Handler #------------------------- if (!search("^Contact:[ ]*\*") && nat_uac_test("19")) { setflag(6); fix_nated_register(); force_rport(); }; sl_send_reply("100", "Trying"); if (!www_authorize("","subscriber")) { www_challenge("","0"); break; }; if (!check_to()) { sl_send_reply("401", "Unauthorized"); break; }; consume_credentials(); if (!save("location")) { sl_reply_error(); }; } route[3] { #---------- #--INVITE Message Handler #----------- if (!proxy_authorize("","subscriber")) { proxy_challenge("","0"); break; } else if (!check_from()) { sl_send_reply("403", "Use From=ID"); break; }; consume_credentials(); if (nat_uac_test("19")) { setflag(6); } lookup("aliases"); if (uri!=myself) { route(4); route(1); break; }; if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "User Not Found"); break; }; route(4); route(1); } route[4] { #NAT Traversal if (isflagset(6)) { force_rport(); fix_nated_contact(); force_rtp_proxy(); } } onreply_route[1] { if (isflagset(6) && status=~"(180)|(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { if (!search("^Contact-Length:[ ]*0")) { force_rtp_proxy(); }; }; if (nat_uac_test("1")) { fix_nated_contact(); }; }

1 0

[Serusers] Voice problem
by ram 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

Hi all I have installed CDROUTER working fine for 30days now almost all iam able to see 120 users calling at a time no problem but past 7days iam getting lot of voice breaking problems and other side not able to hear my side voice my Server config Xeon with 1 GB Ram 86GB hdd and most of the time looks like below ~# free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 903484 897328 6156 0 1892 830208 -/+ buffers/cache: 65228 838256 Swap: 0 0 0 when i check top Cpu use is 2% only when i configure directly with provider using PAP2 , voice is clear can some one guide me what is the problem how can i test and how can i resolve this problem help will be appriciate Ram

1 0

[Serusers] Fwd: help in mediaproxy module
by vijay tiwari 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

Note: forwarded message attached. Vijay Tiwari Network Admin Sachitel Communications Noida(U.P.) M- 09871633711 --------------------------------- Check out the New Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.

1 0

[Serusers] my mail are not coming on mail list
by vijay tiwari 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

hi all problem my mail are not coming on mail list Vijay Tiwari Network Admin Sachitel Communications Noida(U.P.) M- 09871633711 --------------------------------- Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.

1 0

[Users] problem with usrloc db-only mode
by tele＠plexia.com 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

Hi all, A simple question about the db-only mode of usrloc (dbmode 3) I've two proxy configured with db_mode 3 the second proxy it's unable to do lookup on the db, there are no error in the debug log but it send reply "404 not found" to the first proxy. I've noticed that when i do lookup("location") on the second proxy it clean the location table and even if the table is filled with the correct contact it reply with 404. sometimes delete all contacts and sometimes contacts remain but failed lookup. what i'm doing wrong? In first proxy i'm running openser-1.1.0 and in the second the latest openser snapshot. the modparam of usrloc on the two proxy are like: modparam("usrloc|domain","db_url","mysql://SQL_USERNAME:SQL_PASSWORD@SQL_HOST/SQL_DB") modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 3) modparam("usrloc", "matching_mode", 1) thank you, :tele

2 2

Re: [Users] Implementing the CDS(Call Detail Record)
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

1) be sure you are using TM for request forwarding (r_relay) 2) be sure the *db* acc flag is set (and not the one for syslog acc) - see the README 3) look into logs for possible errors. regards, bogdan ShivaSankar Padhy wrote: > > Yah, The same thing now I am looking but also bit confused, I have > used the > > modparam("acc", "log_flag", 2) > and setflag(2) > but I am not able to populate the acc table. > > What is the exact syntax, Can I get it from any where?? > > Thanks a lot for any kind of Help. > Shiva > > On 10/31/06, *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu* <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro > <mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro>> wrote: > > you can use mysql - see the docs of the acc module. > > regards > bogdan > > ShivaSankar Padhy wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > Can I implement the CDR without using the RADIUS Server.??I am using > > openser 1.0.1 notls. Expecting a sooner reply, > > > > Thanks in Advance, > > Shiva > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Users mailing list > > Users(a)openser.org <mailto:Users@openser.org> > >http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > >

1 0

[Users] send im in php
by sinclair fils 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

when i send im in a script php i have this error 2(3549) ERROR: fifo_server: command must begin with :: MESSAGE 2(3549) **** done consume 2(3549) ERROR: fifo_server: command must have at least 3 chars can help me --------------------------------- Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses.

2 1

[Users] New presence server: immediate NOTIFY missing
by Franz Edler 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

Hello, many thanks to all developers of the new presence server. Its a great enhancement to OpenSER. As a small contribution from my side I did some tests with Eyebeam clients. Now I found, that the immediate NOTIFY according to RFC3265 § 3.1.6.2 is missing. To document the behaviour I have attached a trace-file from the server. Frame 6 contains a SUBSCRIBE request which is not confirmed with an immediate NOTIFY request. The first NOTIFY is sent only four minutes later after the first presence state change of the presentity occurred (frame 30). Cheers Franz

4 9

[Users] TLS: what is encrypted in TLS?
by Ferianto siregar 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

Dear all, Thank you for this chance. All, I have tried to learn about how can TLS can secure communication in VoIP. I must to understand it in order to responsible my openser server (working) with TLS to my lecturer. But, I have still doubt. Actually, what is encrypted in TLS system so the communication become secure? Does it encrypt the data (voise packet)? or The traffic (so the sniffer can not get the data? OR anything else? I do hope anybody can help me :) Thanks, Ferianto Note: I cryptography tutorials, I read that the cryptography system secure the message (text) by encrypting it using public key and private key. So, How about TLS in VoIP? --------------------------------- Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail.

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users