sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

4 participants
37456 discussions

[Serusers] ser 0.9.7-pre3 and REFER
by Steve Blair 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

Has anyone noticed that a change to REFER processing with ser 0.9.7-pre3? Blind transfer and call forward seem to have broken with this release. I'm in the process of trying to capture from traces but I wanted to check with this list also. Thanks,Steve

1 0

[Serusers] flush issue with (DBText) flatfile
by Ramachandran Gunasekaran 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

Dear All, I am using dbtext flatfile as location database, SER is not able to write the contact details into the flat file until and unless I kill the SER process. I tried with db_mode as 1 & 2. Does anybody face this issue ? please let me know the solution. Ramachandran G

1 0

[Serusers] avp_check function Query
by Vivek Bhat 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

Hi, I tried to call avp_write() and avp_check() funtctions as below: avp_write("$ruri/username", "s:UNAMEOFRURI"); avp_print(); avp_write("$to/username", "s:UNAMEOFTO"); avp_print(); if (avp_check("s:UNAMEOFRURI", "eq/s:UNAMEOFTO/gi")) { log(1, "Usernames of RURI and TO are identical."); } else { log(1, "Usernames of RURI and TO are NOT identical."); } ------------------------------ However, when avp_check is called, always "esle" part is executed even though "s:UNAMEOFRURI" and "s:UNAMEOFTO" are identical. Why is it happening? I am using SER 0.9.6 on Linux. Is it a bug in SER? The debug output for the above is as below: 9(31343) DEBUG:avpops:print_avp: p=0xbd7340b8, flags=3 9(31343) DEBUG: name=<UNAMEOFRURI> 9(31343) DEBUG: val_str=<7267261005> 9(31343) parse_headers: flags=4 9(31343) DEBUG:avpops:print_avp: p=0xbd7340f0, flags=3 9(31343) DEBUG: name=<UNAMEOFTO> 9(31343) DEBUG: val_str=<7267261004> 9(31343) DEBUG:avpops:print_avp: p=0xbd7340b8, flags=3 9(31343) DEBUG: name=<UNAMEOFRURI> 9(31343) DEBUG: val_str=<7267261005>^ 9(31343) DEBUG:avpops:check_avp: check <7267261005> against <UNAMEOFTO> as str 9(31343) DEBUG:avpops:check_avp: checked failed ---------------------------------------------------------- Note that while executing avp_check, it checks 7267261005 against UNAMEOFTO instead of "7267261004". Why is that? Thanks, Vivek Bhat __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

[Serusers] Via header inserted with public IP
by Gaurav Kulshreshtha 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

All. I m using SER 0.9.7pre1 with RTPProxy and this box sits on the boundary of private and public networks. REGISTERs hit this box from public side and are forwarded to private side for registration processing. The message is forwarded to the private ip but there are two weird things I noticed .. a) Even though the packet leaves from the private interface the src ip address is set to public IP b) Newly added Via header has public side IP address and not the private side IP address. This causes problems in routing the response to REGISTER method. Any suggestions welcomes Thanks Gaurav Kulshreshtha

2 1

[Serusers] core dumped and Xten/IPPhone cannot register
by Asep Saifudin 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

Hi, I install ser-0.9.6_2, radiusclient-0.5.2 and mysql-(server & client)-5.0.22in my FreeBSD 5.4 Os When I check to vi /var/log/messages, I got messages like this below : Jul 19 20:04:27 sangbintang kernel: pid 35668 (ser), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) after I type ser -c Also my Xten lite or my IPPhone cannot register to it allthough I have create some account in subscriber table Does anybody knows what happen to my ser server ? need your advise ~Asep

1 0

[Serusers] Re-writing URI using location database
by Ramachandran Gunasekaran 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

Dear all, Does anybody have achieved this re-write URI using location database? If yes, please send me the routing logic for the same. I don't want to hardwire the values in the ser.cfg file using rewriteuri(xxxx) and append_branch(xxxx). But I want this to be automatically done through location server. Any information on this matter is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Ramachandran

3 2

[Serusers] ser upgrade and ghost ser process
by Giuseppe Parlato 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

hi all, got two problems, I upgraded ser from 0.8.14 to 0.9.6 make prefix=/ make prefix=/ all include_modules="mysql jabber cpl-c auth_radius group_radius uri_radius avp_radius postgres pa" make prefix=/ install however ser -V still show me, version: 0.8.14 (i386/linux) flags: STATS:Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 @(#) $Id: main.c,v 1.168.4.3 2004/06/28 15:41:21 andrei Exp $ main.c compiled on 15:48:23 Jan 19 2005 with gcc 3.2 why? then I get the second problem after ser is started (fine, without error) because actually I can't find it among all process, ... how is it possible possible ???? thanks Giuseppe

3 5

[Serusers] INVITE format.
by Ricardo Martinez 18 Jul '06

18 Jul '06

Hello list. I have a question not directly related with SER, but i was hoping that someone could give me a hand here. I'm not very familiar with this type of INVITE. INVITE sip:3341876@mydomain.sip.com SIP/2.0 v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.241:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2542945499 f: "558100005481" <sip:558100005481@mydomain.sip.com>;tag=1000053237 t: <sip:3341876@mydomain.sip.com> i: 1de74610a4a7dba71ac257ea510065c9(a)10.10.10.241 CSeq: 19 INVITE m: sip:558100005481@10.10.10.241 Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: SIP-ICSG302-1.139-icablesystem/v2.0_enabled Allow: INVITE, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, BYE, REFER Supported: timer, replaces c: application/sdp Accept: application/sdp l: 295 v=0 o=558100005481 1123541222 1123541222 IN IP4 10.10.10.241 s=SIP Call t=0 0 m=audio 5094 RTP/AVP 18 4 0 8 103 c=IN IP4 10.10.10.241 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:103 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:103 0-15 a=ptime:20 What format is V: ? , f : ?, i : ?. Are these values according to the RFC? Sorry about this maybe stupid question. Thanks Ricardo.-

3 2

[Users] Redirect and fork
by Andrew And 18 Jul '06

18 Jul '06

How can I do Redirect in my Openser (server)? And if I have 2 or more destination I need to do redirect + fork. Does someone could help my?

1 0

Re: R: R: R: [Serusers] SER with 2 ethernet + PSTN gateway: RTPPROXY bridge mode conf
by Greger V. Teigre 18 Jul '06

18 Jul '06

Fabio Macchi wrote: > > Greger, you are right, I was too generic, anyway your "not sensible > help" was unvaluable: it focus me to the onreply route that I forgot > to consider before. > > I was missing the parameters "FA" in force_rtp_proxy() and this was > the cause of missing RTP connection. > > Now everything is working as expected. > Excellent! :-) > > > > Just two generic questions on rtpproxy to understand a little more: > > - is it possible to extend this configuration from two > interface to multiple interfaces ( I mean something like rtpproxy --l > x.x.x.246/10.0.0.1/192.168.1.1 ) ? > AFAIK, no. But I cannot really see how such a scenario can easily be unambiguous? What do you want to do with three interfaces? Three subnets terminated on your SER server?! You can probably set up multiple rtpproxies, but you still have a problem in making one ser talk to more than one... > > - when I was debbuging, I tried to start rtpproxy with --f > option and I expected output directly on terminal, but I didn't obtain > any output: is the output redirected to a specific file ? am I > misunderstanding the use of that option ?' > stderr should be target. However, you may want to edit rtpp_defines.h and set LOG_LEVEL to RTPP_LOG_DBUG and recompile to get maximum of messages. Default you only get warnings, errors, and critical messages, not informational or debug messages. > > Anyway, many thanks for your support. > Just a pleasure ;-) g-)

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users