sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

42 participants
37517 discussions

How to read "duid" from dispatcher.list in kamamilio.cfg
by Jani Biju Babjan 21 Oct '20

21 Oct '20

Hi, I have a dispatcher.list file like the following: 1 sip:127.0.0.1:5060 0 0 duid=abcd;maxload=5 1 sip:127.0.0.2:5060 0 0 duid=efgh;maxload=5 After calling the ds_select_dst("1", "4") function(ie, round-robin selection), I want to read the value of the "duid" attribute of the selected destination and then pass it to a database. How can I read this value in the configuration file? Jani Biju Babjan

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] Load balance on HA scenario
by Yufei Tao 21 Oct '20

21 Oct '20

Hi Joel, Thanks for the tip! Having the pings disabled and enable it on HA status being master sounds like a good idea :) Cheers, Yufei

1 0

ERROR: <core> [core/socket_info.c:2225]: parse_protohostport():
by Andy Kama 20 Oct '20

20 Oct '20

I am seeing this error in the logs i am using kamailio 5.4.1 any idea what the cause is? ERROR: <core> [core/socket_info.c:2225]: parse_protohostport(): bad protocol in sip:myp:5060

2 4

Re: [SR-Users] Load balance on HA scenario
by Yufei Tao 20 Oct '20

20 Oct '20

Hi Duarte, Not sure if I understand it correctly but are you trying to set up an HA pair of dispatchers? If so I am doing it differently in that, I use the Virtual/floating IP (VIP) as socket. This way the master node (which has got the VIP) can send OPTIONs pings out fine but the backup node won't be able to send. Functionally it is fine, but the backup node keeps logging errors because it doesn't have the VIP: ERROR: <core> [core/udp_server.c:599]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f0e6b54e2e0, len: 372, 0, dst: (192.168.213.143:5060), tolen: 16) - err: Network is unreachable (101) ERROR: tm [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed When FO happens, the backup node becomes master and takes the VIP, and it functions correctly. But I haven't worked out how to avoid the ERROR loggings on the backup node. Maybe someone else has any better ideas/suggestions? Cheers, Yufei

2 1

No retry on INVITE
by Allan Kristensen 20 Oct '20

20 Oct '20

Hello, I'm trying to get Kamailio to retry INVITE. We have a Freeswitch which is sending INVITE to a sip user via Kamailio proxy using static ip/location. All is well, calls are flowing, but sometimes INVITE from kamailio to user is lost and no attempt to retry is occurring and so after 30 sec kamailio just returns 408 Request timeout. Call flow is like this: FS Kamailio User --- INVITE --> <-- 100 Trying --- INVITE ---> (Waiting 30 secs) <-- 408 Timeout --- ACK ---> So assume we have failed in handling retries somehow. Kamailio is running stateless, but other retries are working, so I assume this is not a problem? Can someone perhaps point us in the right direction on where to solve this? Kamailio is version 5.2.4 Thank you... /Allan

3 4

Re: [SR-Users] SRTP
by Yufei Tao 20 Oct '20

20 Oct '20

Hi, Like Olle said RTPEngine is perfectly capable of handling one leg in RTP the other in SRTP. When looking up RTPEngine's documentation, may be worth checking these out: SRTP SDES-unencrypted_srtp SDES-unencrypted_srtcp SDES-unauthenticated_srtp e.g. try apply these flags to rtpengin_offer() on the incoming RTP leg, to get RTPEngine to add encryption to the outgoing leg etc. Cheers, Yufei

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 5.2.5 - Need help with rtpengine error
by Yufei Tao 20 Oct '20

20 Oct '20

Hi Andrew, Like Alex said, have a look at the commands RTPEngine received and the responses it sent in the history of the call, and see if RTPEngine has ever received any commands regarding this call, or, if the call has been deleted from RTPEngine. You can raise the RTPEngine logging level to 6 for example so you can see the command/responses of RTPEngine. Cheers, Yufei

1 0

about registrar save()/lookup()
by Juha Heinanen 20 Oct '20

20 Oct '20

I didn't find any mention in registrar module README that save() function saves also branch flags and that lookup() retrieves them. Is that documented somewhere? -- Juha

3 5

dialog_active_dialogs erroneous value
by Sergiu Pojoga 20 Oct '20

20 Oct '20

Hi there, Every now and then, the value of active dialogs metric spikes to an erroneous huge number, messing up my otherwise beautiful grafana gauges :( Example: kamailio_dialog_active_dialogs 18446744073709551614 1602812239115 kamailio_dialog_early_dialogs 0 1602812239115 kamailio_dialog_expired_dialogs 2 1602812239115 kamailio_dialog_failed_dialogs 7361 1602812239115 Anybody faced the same symptoms, any clues what might be causing this? Thanks, --Sergiu

3 6

TOPOS module and fix_nated_contact
by Minh Phan 19 Oct '20

19 Oct '20

Hi List, I am using Topos module to hide network topology. I am having a problem of routing the ACK request for REINVITE. Here is the schema: A KAMAILIO B 1. --------- INVITE --------> 2. <---- 180 RINGING --- 3. <---- 200 OK --- 4. ---- ACK ---> 5. <--------- (RE) INVITE -- 6. --------- OK ---> 7. <---- ACK ----- (THIS ACK IS SENT TO PRIVATE IP OF A) I use TOPOS module along with fix_nated_contact as I would do normally for natted UAs. The first ACK (4) is routed correctly but not the second one (7), which is routed to the PRIVATE IP of A instead of routing to its public address. Has anyone run into this problem while using TOPOS module? How could I make them work together? Best Regards, Minh Phan

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users