sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

23 participants
37378 discussions

AEM Implementation Services,
by surekhatech.seo＠gmail.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

As an Official Adobe Bronze Solution Partner, we specialize in AEM development services, consulting, implementation, migration, and cloud services for your business.

1 0

Question: if SIP Timer L and Timer M from RFC6026 has been defined at Kamailio
by jennifer yang 02 May '24

02 May '24

Hello Can anyone help answer these questions: - if SIP Timer L and Timer M from RFC6026 has been defined at Kamailio (version v5.5.x)? Timer L: Wait time for accepted INVITE request retransmits Timer M: Wait time for retransmission of 2xx to INVITE or additional 2xx from other branches of a forked INVITE - if no specific Timer defined, which timer will be used instead? thanks br jenni

1 0

Issue with serial call forking to same destination
by Mathias 30 Apr '24

30 Apr '24

Hi I've an issue with serial call forking and I hope somebody can help me... What I'm trying to reach: We are using Kamailio in a dynamic network with multiple nodes. The dialplan is implemented using the KEMI interface. The call routing is completely dynamic. At the moment, we are having call groups, which may contain 1 or more recipients. If the number of this call group is called, Kamailio is doing a parallel forking to all group participants. Now I'm trying to extend the feature, that if nobody hooks up, the call is forwarded to another number. This has been implemented with serial forking. So the dialplan adds branches for all call group members with a q value of 1 and the last branch is the failover number with a lower q value. The branching and failure route works fine. The problem: * I have a call group (G Bob 900101), with one participant (Bob 200102). * The group has a fail over number (if Bob doesn't hook up), which points again to Bob. I know that this use case doesn't make much sense, but it has been simplified to show the problem. The failover number can be anything also another call group which may contain one or more recipients from the first group again. * Alice (200101) calls the call group * The first node (10.0.1.1/10.64.0.1) receives the call and forks it to branch 1 Bob (202102) with q value 1.0 and to a second branch Bob (202102) with q value 0.5. fr_timer is set to 10s * The call is forwarded to node 2 (10.0.2.1/10.64.0.2), where Bob is registered. * The call is forwarded to Bobs device (Grandstream GXV3350) and the phone is ringing. * After 10s, the first node detects the 408 Request Timeout and switches to the second branch * The invite is sent to node 2 and Bobs device again. * Node 1 also sends a CANCEL to node 2 and Bobs device for the first branch. * The call in Bobs device is terminated * Now the problem, the device does not react to the second INVITE. And after the fr_inv_timer expires, the call is terminated with a 408 Request Timeout. I can see that the second INVITE contains another branch ID <ID>.1 compared to the first INVITE, which had <ID>.0. The CANCEL is also sent with <ID>.0. I've also tried with a Cisco 8861 3PCC and it doesn't work either. Compared to the Grandstream, the Cisco device returns an error 500 upon the second INVITE. Since both devices do not accept what I'm trying, I guess I'm doing something wrong... At the moment I'm a bit lost, what the problem could be. Does somebody have an idea what it is and how I could solve it? Following two SIP dumps from node 1 and node 2: Node 1: |Time | 10.0.1.128 | 10.64.0.1 | | | | 10.0.1.1 | | 10.0.2.1 | |2024-01-31 14:17:07.792784| INVITE SDP (g711A g7 | | |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> Call-ID:2102072978-5060-296@BA.A.B.BCI CSeq:2950 | |(47276) ------------------> (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:07.793060| 407 Proxy Authentica | | |SIP Status 407 Proxy Authentication Required | |(47276) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:07.796613| ACK | | | |SIP ACK From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2950 | |(47276) ------------------> (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:07.799045| INVITE SDP (g711A g7 | | |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> Call-ID:2102072978-5060-296@BA.A.B.BCI CSeq:2951 | |(47276) ------------------> (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:07.836471| 100 trying -- your c | | |SIP Status 100 trying -- your call is important to us | |(47276) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:07.865219| | | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.036334| | | 100 trying -- your c |SIP Status 100 trying -- your call is important to us | | | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.084421| | | 180 Ringing |SIP Status 180 Ringing | | | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.096834| 180 Ringing | | |SIP Status 180 Ringing | |(47276) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.099644| | | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.100099| | | CANCEL | |SIP CANCEL From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.259375| | | 100 trying -- your c |SIP Status 100 trying -- your call is important to us | | | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.274841| | | 200 canceling |SIP Status 200 canceling | | | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.296942| | | 487 Request Terminat |SIP Status 487 Request Terminated | | | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.298630| | | ACK | |SIP ACK From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:20.281602| | | 408 Request Timeout |SIP Status 408 Request Timeout | | | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:20.283433| | | ACK | |SIP ACK From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:20.307343| 408 Request Timeout | | |SIP Status 408 Request Timeout | |(47276) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:20.309097| ACK | | | |SIP ACK From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | |(47276) ------------------> (5061) | | | Node 2: |Time | 10.64.0.1 | 10.64.0.2 | | | | 10.0.2.1 | | 10.0.2.128 | |2024-01-31 14:17:07.869305| INVITE SDP (g711A g7 | | |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> Call-ID:2102072978-5060-296@BA.A.B.BCI CSeq:2951 | |(54454) ------------------> (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.036009| 100 trying -- your c | | |SIP Status 100 trying -- your call is important to us | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.050848| | | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.054357| | 100 Trying| | |SIP Status 100 Trying | | |(5061) <-------------------------------------- (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.075422| | 180 Ringing | |SIP Status 180 Ringing | | |(5061) <-------------------------------------- (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.083887| 180 Ringing | | |SIP Status 180 Ringing | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.100359| INVITE SDP (g711A g7 | | |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> Call-ID:2102072978-5060-296@BA.A.B.BCI CSeq:2951 | |(54454) ------------------> (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.258947| 100 trying -- your c | | |SIP Status 100 trying -- your call is important to us | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.273819| | | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.274460| CANCEL | | | |SIP Request CANCEL CSeq:2951 | |(54454) ------------------> (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.274550| | | CANCEL | |SIP CANCEL From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.274615| 200 canceling | | |SIP Status 200 canceling | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.277438| | 200 OK | | |SIP Status 200 OK | | |(5061) <-------------------------------------- (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.279335| | 487 Request Terminated | |SIP Status 487 Request Terminated | | |(5061) <-------------------------------------- (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.280785| | | ACK | |SIP ACK From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.296312| 487 Request Terminat | | |SIP Status 487 Request Terminated | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.298900| ACK | | | |SIP ACK From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | |(54454) ------------------> (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:20.280965| 408 Request Timeout | | |SIP Status 408 Request Timeout | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:20.283730| ACK | | | |SIP ACK From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | |(54454) ------------------> (5061) | | | At the moment, I'm using Kamailio 5.5.4, but I also did a short try with a newer version (I guess it was 5.7.4). Both versions showed the same issue. Best regards Mathias

1 0

Sudden TCP errors and shared memory spikes
by David Cunningham 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Hello, We have a production Kamailio 5.2.7 server which has suddenly started reporting spikes in the shared memory use. When looking into this, we noticed that at the same time as the memory spikes Kamailio also logs a huge amount of errors like the following. Can anyone help with an explanation for what's going on? The xx.xx.52.202 address is the Kamailio server itself. We record historical numbers of network connections for the server overall, and that doesn't show any increase in the number of TCP connections, either at the time of the spikes or as a general trend. Thanks in advance! Apr 26 09:23:16 vpbx11 /sbin/kamailio[44272]: ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2703]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect xx.xx.52.202:42726 failed (RST) Connection refused Apr 26 09:23:16 vpbx11 /sbin/kamailio[44272]: ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2711]: tcpconn_1st_send(): xx.xx.52.202:42726: connect & send for 0x14bbf44c9f40 failed: Connection refused (111) Apr 26 09:23:16 vpbx11 /sbin/kamailio[44272]: ERROR: tm [../../core/forward.h:293]: msg_send_buffer(): tcp_send failed Apr 26 09:23:16 vpbx11 /sbin/kamailio[44272]: WARNING: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:1149]: tcp_do_connect(): xx.xx.52.202:42726: could not find corresponding listening socket for xx.xx.52.202, using default... -- David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited http://voisonics.com/ USA: +1 213 221 1092 New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782

2 2

tls_threads_mode and app_python3 module
by Ihor Olkhovskyi 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Hello, Just to confirm, as I quickly checked into a code of 5.8.x branch, there were no modification on app_python3 module to comply with tls_threads_mode mechanism? Asking this beforehand posting a bug, that if using a quite simple script into module, with tls_threads_mode = 2 Kamailio just hangs at the start and become unresponsive. And by simple I mean something like this class PyKamailio: def __init__(self): self.test = 1 def child_init(self, rank): """Executed by app_python module when a new worker process (child) is initialized by Kamailio.""" return 1 def mod_init(): """ Executed by app_python module when it is initialized by Kamailio.""" return PyKamailio() with tls_threads_mode = 1 and 3 it loads, but if add some HTTPS calls inside the script (even not the calls, but importing the methods, that are making calls with import), it just start failing on TLS load, despite that on packets processed (OPTIONS) no python_exec() is called, just from the fact of having HTTPS calls into Python script. -- Best regards, Ihor (Igor)

1 1

RTP Engine with Kamailio hold issue
by Vishal Pai 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Hello Everyone I am using kamailio with RTP engine for wss to udp to connect my asterisk server. It all works well like wss to UDP registration via kamailio to asterisk. Here I am facing an issue with call hold i.e if I hold the call from B leg it gets disconnected. Any advice why it get failed and hangups Thanks

1 0

Error by installing new Rel. 5.8
by lm.eng＠live.com 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Hello,, I am using this docker file for installaing kamailio. I wana use it with open5gs for trynig VoNR , I used before it for VoLTE it works but right now I have this error in installation process. icscf | 0(34) ERROR: <core> [core/sr_module.c:527]: ksr_locate_module(): could not find module <maxfwd> in </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/ lib64/kamailio/modules/:/usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/lib/kamailio/modules/:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/:/usr/local/lib64/kamailio/ modules> icscf | 0(34) CRITICAL: <core> [core/cfg.y:4008]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /etc/kamailio_icscf/kamailio_icscf.cfg, line 94, colu mn 12-19: failed to load module scscf | 0(38) ERROR: <core> [core/sr_module.c:527]: ksr_locate_module(): could not find module <maxfwd> in </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/ lib64/kamailio/modules/:/usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/lib/kamailio/modules/:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/:/usr/local/lib64/kamailio/ and there is docker file that Im using: FROM ubuntu:focal ENV DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive # Install updates and dependencies RUN apt-get update && \ apt-get -y install mysql-server tcpdump screen tmux ntp ntpdate git-core dkms \ gcc flex bison libmysqlclient-dev make libssl-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev \ libxml2-dev libpcre2-dev bash-completion g++ autoconf libmnl-dev \ libsctp-dev libradcli-dev libradcli4 libjson-c-dev pkg-config iproute2 net-tools \ iputils-ping # Fetch Kamailio code (branch 5.3) RUN mkdir -p /usr/local/src/ && cd /usr/local/src/ && \ git clone https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio && \ cd kamailio && git checkout 5.8 # Build and Install Kamailio RUN cd /usr/local/src/kamailio && make cfg COPY modules.lst /usr/local/src/kamailio/src RUN cd /usr/local/src/kamailio && \ make -j`nproc` Q=0 all | tee make_all.txt && \ make install | tee make_install.txt && \ ldconfig COPY kamailio_init.sh / CMD /kamailio_init.sh

2 1

Understanding NAT Flags
by Benoit Panizzon 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Hi Gang Somehow I don't get my head around NAT Flags and the nathelper module https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.7.x/modules/nathelper.html In the examples I found, there is: FLT_NATS and FLB_NATB If I got it right, FLB_NATB is a branch flag, which shall indicate that the device is 'B'ehind NAT, right? It is being set, when FLT_NATS is set: if(isflagset(FLT_NATS)) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); } But when should FLT_NATS be set and what is it's meaning? The examples I found don't tell me this. Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

3 4

Outbound Proxy/Forwarder
by Blake Ivey 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Hi everyone, New user who is trying to make an outbound proxy to route a lot of freepbx boxes for outbound calls. I got this setup and working using dsiprouter. Calls come in from freepbx trunk using outbound proxy, authenticated using IP auth, and then gets signed with our stirshaken cert, then routes out to our carriers. Interested in using plain kamailio. Got everything compiled and libstirshaken compiled. Just wanted to see if someone could point me in the right direction for the cfg file. I assume I would match how I have it in dsiprouter. That config has a lot of things I'm not using and having a hard time deciphering it. My thoughts on what I need: MySQL database. Have a table for ip auth, a table for voice carriers, and a table for 911 carriers. Invite comes in, it checks ip auth table and responds with 403 if it's not on the list. If it is, proceed to stir shaken signing, and then route the call? I assume I will need to have some logic to tell voice calls and emergency calls. I got plain old routing/forwarding working and now want to focus on locking it down. Any thoughts, examples configs, anything would be awesome. I am hoping to get this working and then having a primary/standby or even load balancing them but im in the very early stages of trying to get my head around Kamailio. Thanks for any insights!

2 1

How to identify the instances of a looping call (including all replies and on all transactions)
by Benoit Panizzon 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Hi List I have stumbled over this challenge: I have a kamailio server without dialog module. Only tmx module, acting as registrar / rtpengine host. If the call is routed over that server once, this works fine. If the call is routed more than once (call from one location to another on same registrar, call forwarding) then to correctly work, I would need to engage rtpengine in a way to tell rtpengine to handle both call legs separately. By default, rtpengine identifies one call by Call-ID,FromTag,ToTag so it considers all invocations to target one instance and on the 2nd invocations it replaces the source rtp ip by it's own ip killing audio. Using 'loop-protect' to prevent the 2nd invocation 'sort-of' works, but not cleanly if I use different 'private' ip ranges on my voice core and IC network to which CPE should not talk. It is possible to pass a custom Call-ID to rtpengine. So this is how I am considering finding a solution. When passing the call-id to rtpengine I could append a leg identifier to that call-id. like $avp(rtp-callid) = $ci + $var(leg-id) How could I reliably generate this leg-id / tell the legs apart? Consider this situation: leg 1 leg 2 CPE-A => Kam-Reg => Routing Core => Kam-Reg => CPE-B Also I wonder if I can use an AVP at all? From Kamailio's Point of view, the first invite being routed twice could be the same transaction with same shared AVP, right? Is there a way to pass some information via flags appended route-header? Or maybe use the count of via or route header to tell the legs apart? Any ideas very appreciated. Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users