2 Sep
2007
2 Sep
'07
8:43 p.m.
Apology accepted :-) sure, I share your frustration, but you see, ironic
posts won't give us any more documentation... And I am by no means a SER
2.0 expert, due to my non-coding status I'm nearly as far behind as
others (but yes, my involvement makes it easier to navigate new stuff).
I don't get nearly enough time to play around with things as I want.
The module in question is db_ops and now that I am online again, I see
that the README file in the modules/db_ops has not been converted to
online doc yet (a non-developer, regular user took on the job to convert
the docs, but due to change in work situation had to quit before he
finished all and nobody has stepped up yet.)
g-)
PS! btw, yes, I admit I was "snippy" in my last post, so maybe some of
what you wrote was warrented. I'm not paid to do support on serusers and
every time I spend time doing it, I use precious personal time that
could have been spent on ... documentation (or maybe even family)!
SIP wrote:
You know, I just reread my latest email and it sounds
pretty offensive.
That was NOT its intention, and I apologise.
My point is, you seem to have the mistaken impression that a lot of us
have roughly the same skill level and experience as you do when you give
guidance with SER. I assure you, this is most certainly not the case.
If it were, we wouldn't be constantly asking you for answers. :)
I would very much have given a better answer to Jesús if I HAD one, but
I don't. I myself was kind of hoping for a little more detail on that
one without having to dig through the code/modules.
N.
Greger Viken Teigre wrote:
Well, considering I was posting from my mobile
(and right now as well), didn't remember the exact names, and iptel.org has an
excellent doc search system, I considered that well within the capabilities of people who
use SER. That should hold, BTW, for you as well, so if you think more guidance is needed,
instead of posting ironic comments, you could help the "poor" guy by looking it
up yourself and post more details.
g-)
------- Original message -------
From: SIP <sip(a)arcdiv.com>
Cc: terblas(a)gmail.com, serusers(a)iptel.org
Sent: 1.9.'07, 14:26
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
So are you going to tell poor Jesús what these
magical modules are, or
just leave him guessing? ;)
N.
Greger Viken Teigre wrote:
With ser 2.x there are a couple of modules for
sql direct (even raw sql) access. Should fit the bill...
g-)
------- Original message -------
From: SIP <sip(a)arcdiv.com>
Cc: serusers(a)iptel.org
Sent: 31.8.'07, 20:39
> Jesús Terán wrote:
>
>
>
>> Hello, I am using the exec_dset for access to my database mysql
>> and change the uri in the calls, but I think this use more CPU
>> processing, Are there other module to do the same?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Jesus Teran B.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
>>
>>
> I'm aware of none pre-written for that purpose... however, you could
> probably modify one in existence to do just that in C/C++ (assuming you
> could reverse engineer what's going on in the modules) and it would
> likely be a lot faster than spawning a shell process for each call.
>
> N.
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers