Hm, 480 should be used for DND, I think. AFAIK, SJPhone should use 486,
not sure about the others.
g-)
Kamal.Mann(a)t-systems.com wrote:
Ser uses '486 busy here' for busy notifications which is correct
according to rfc but sip phones like x-lite, 3CX Phone, SJPhone uses
'480 temp unavailable here' for the same !!!!
Regards
Kamal Mann
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 27, 2006 8:19 PM
*To:* Mann, Kamal
*Cc:* serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
*Subject:* Re: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd
You do lookup("aliases") and lookup("location") AFTER you have
changed
the uri through avp_pushto from usr_preferences.
Is this really what you want?
g-)
Kamal.Mann(a)t-systems.com <mailto:Kamal.Mann@t-systems.com> wrote:
Hi All
I want to setup Blind call forwarding. Like if a uri - mann(a)iptel.org
<mailto:mann@iptel.org>
is not registered with SER but this user had already configured in ser
database table usr_prefrences that his call should be forwarde to
another uri kamal(a)iptel.org <mailto:kamal@iptel.org>. For that my usr_prefrence
table is like
USR_PREFRENCES table
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
+
---------------+
| uuid | username | domain | attribute | value | type
|
modified |
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
+
----------------+
| | bhaskar | debian | callfwd | kamal(a)iptel.org
<mailto:kamal@iptel.org>
| 0 | 20060926165852 |
| | mann |
iptel.org | callfwd | sip:kamal@iptel.org
<mailto:sip:kamal@iptel.org> | 0
|
20060926150443 |
| | prateek |
iptel.org | callfwd | kamal(a)iptel.org
<mailto:kamal@iptel.org> | 0
|
20060926170701 |
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
+
----------------+
Is this entry is correct?? Is there any flaw in my ser.cfg??
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards
Kamal Mann
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Blair [mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 2:26 PM
To: Mann, Kamal
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd
Does your config file relay REFER messages? It needs to in order to
perform the transfer.
Kamal.Mann(a)t-systems.com <mailto:Kamal.Mann@t-systems.com> wrote:
Hi all
Please help out
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Mann, Kamal
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 26, 2006 5:46 PM
*To:* 'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>'
*Subject:* RE: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd
Hi all
I am implementing Blind call forwarding with 0.9.6 SER version. But
with current configuration it's not working. Please help on same.
I am enclosing small part of usr_prefrences table & my ser.cfg.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers