RE: [Serusers] SER and the SPA3000

I believe the 401 being swallowed by SER is a limitation of ser... i seem to remember from an ealier post in a different thread that this is why ser cannot reliably by used as a UA to register to external services... ser can send an invite, but it can't respond to 401s and resend digest invites. It seems the same logic would apply if you want it to pass on digest invite requests to the sipura device. I dont know if it's on the roadmap anywhere!... Not sure if i'm right, sure someone at iptel can tell us.. .but hope it helped a little... Dave ________________________________ From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org on behalf of Andres Sent: Mon 09/08/2004 22:42 To: Greg Fausak Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org; Juha Heinanen Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER and the SPA3000 Greg Fausak wrote: I'll give this a try and let you know. Could be, but I am unsure if this would be a SER limitation or SIP limitation. The packet trace reveals that the SPA3000 challenge is being swallowed by SER. What I mean is, this 401 is not being sent back to UA1 so there is nothing to see in this part of the leg. The 401 being sent back by the SPA3000 looks as normal as a 401 being sent back by SER to a user upon an INVITE. I can certainly grab these traces again tonight and send them to you. -- Andres Network Admin http://www.telesip.net _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers