20 Apr
2005
20 Apr
'05
12:41 a.m.
ljzhang,
Also, one post is usually sufficient to get a response from this mailing list.
Regards, Paul
On 4/12/05, ljzhang xueyou38@163.com wrote:
Hi all,
Here is my confusion about SER supporting NAT transversal.
- With only RTPProxy, what kinds of types of NAT can SER with nathelper
transverse? 2. What's the difference between MediaProxy and RTPProxy? 3. If UA supports STUN, do SER need to configure nathelper to support NAT transversal? Just because I knew STUN protocol only process a few kinds of types of NAT, I want to know what advantage it will add if I configure SER with nathelper.
Thanks a lot!
ljzhang xueyou38@163.com 2005-04-12
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers