Jiri Kuthan wrote:
What kind of?
I have tested with ser-2.0, Our UA still has some problem when use SER 2.0.
200OK was dropped in double hold case.
The scenario is:
UA1 SER UA2
INVITE-> I NVITE->
200OK<- 200OK<-
ACK-> ACK->
INVITE(sendonly)<- INVITE(sendonly)<-
200OK(recvonly)-> 200OK(recvonly)->
ACK<- ACK<-
INVITE(inactive)-> INVITE(inactive)->
200OK(inactive)<-
SER dropped this 200OK
UA1 use TCP connect to SER
UA2 use UDP connect to SER
________________________________
From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org 代表 Jiri Kuthan
Sent: 2008-8-30 (星期六) 4:01
To: Steven Wu
Cc: SER Users
Subject: Re: [Serusers] 答复: 答复: SER Version
Steven Wu wrote:
Hi Victor,
Is it version same as the SIP proxy on Iptel.org?
HEAD version is running there.
Actually, the situation is I'm handling a bug in
my SIP UA that iptel
SIP proxy dropped our ACK
in double hold case.
Unfortunately, I can't register to public iptel SIP proxy at
iptel.org
due to our NAT box has some problem.
what kind of?
So, I want to install a same SIP proxy at our local
networking.
Is there any special config in SIP proxy at iptel.org?
we use somewhat modified OOB.
-jiri
Best regards,
Steven Wu
*From:* Victor Pascual A'vila [mailto:victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 2008-8-28 (星期四) 16:11
*To:* Steven Wu
*Cc:* Arun Kumar; SER Users
*Subject:* Re: 答复: [Serusers] SER Version
2008/8/28 Steven Wu <Steven.Wu(a)teleca.com>
Which is the up to date SER version?
Version 2.0.0:
http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/2.0.0/src/ser-2.0.0_src.tar.gz
Jan also created a tag in the cvs repository. You can use the
following command to get version 2.0.0: cvs co -r v_2_0_0 sip_router
Cheers,
--
Victor Pascual A'vila
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers