Re: [SR-Users] Problem with loose_route for a BYE

Thank you Daniel for your analyse. It’s strange, because there’s no NAT. We force the RTPProxy in order to bypass routing issue in this call-flow, but both platform are reachable with public IP address. I will look at the old SER and see why he does fix_nated_contact(). Regards, Igor. De : sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] De la part de Daniel-Constantin Mierla Envoyé : mercredi 20 novembre 2013 22:37 À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Problem with loose_route for a BYE On 11/20/13 6:10 PM, Igor Potjevlesch wrote: Hello, Thank you for your reply. Indeed, I think that R-URI contains the kamailio address. The old ser should not do fix_nated_contact() for traffic comming from kamailio. It is not in the position to figure out the address of the nat router. That is done by kamailio (which should use anyhow add_contact_alias(), because it is a better alternative for nat fixing). Cheers, Daniel [...] -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28 - more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com - --- Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active. http://www.avast.com