Does this work as a far-end NAT traversal solution (ALG running only where SER/Asterisk is hosted, not where UAs are located)?
Mark
On 9/2/05, jeff kwong kwongfucius@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Waldo,
I didn't do anything else outside the instructions as in the Getting Started Manual from Onsip.org http://Onsip.org for the SER with MySQL and connecting to a PSTN gateway.I also got the config from there. I also got a good set of tips for that in my previous posts here. As for the Siproxd, I just followed the online docs here: http://siproxd.sourceforge.net/ .
On 9/2/05, Waldo Rubinstein < waldo@trianet.net> wrote:
Wouldn't mind learning from your accomplishments. How about sharing some how-tos and/or config files?
Would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Waldo
On Sep 2, 2005, at 12:58 AM, jeff kwong wrote:
Hi Guys!
I just would like to share that I was able to get a working setup using SER as Softswitch, Asterisk as PSTN gateway and SIPROXD on my NAT Router. SIPROXD is an open source ALG and it effectively handles sip nat traversals. With it I dont have to run a seperate mediaproxy. When making calls from SIP UA to PSTN, RTP is as below:
UA---NAT/SIPROXD---ASTERISK
for 2 UA behind the same NAT:
UA1--NAT---UA2
and for 2 UA behind different NATs:
UA1--NAT1----NAT2---UA2
Thus there is less latency on signals and less traffic on SER. My question is, from the experience of other guys here, what do you think is the drawback or advantages of using SIPROXD together with SER to solve SIP NAT issues compared to other methods like using mediaproxy and rtpproxy?Will I still be able to do other SER features like accounting?
Thanks! _jeff _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers