2 Sep
2005
2 Sep
'05
8:57 a.m.
Does this work as a far-end NAT traversal solution (ALG running only where
SER/Asterisk is hosted, not where UAs are located)?
Mark
On 9/2/05, jeff kwong <kwongfucius(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Waldo,
I didn't do anything else outside the instructions as in the Getting
Started Manual from Onsip.org <http://Onsip.org> for the SER with MySQL
and connecting to a PSTN gateway.I also got the config from there. I also
got a good set of tips for that in my previous posts here. As for the
Siproxd, I just followed the online docs here:
http://siproxd.sourceforge.net/ .
On 9/2/05, Waldo Rubinstein < waldo(a)trianet.net> wrote:
Wouldn't mind learning from your accomplishments. How about sharing
some how-tos and/or config files?
Would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Waldo
On Sep 2, 2005, at 12:58 AM, jeff kwong wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi Guys!
I just would like to share that I was able to get a working setup
using SER as Softswitch, Asterisk as PSTN gateway and SIPROXD on my
NAT Router. SIPROXD is an open source ALG and it effectively
handles sip nat traversals. With it I dont have to run a seperate
mediaproxy. When making calls from SIP UA to PSTN, RTP is as below:
UA---NAT/SIPROXD---ASTERISK
for 2 UA behind the same NAT:
UA1--NAT---UA2
and for 2 UA behind different NATs:
UA1--NAT1----NAT2---UA2
Thus there is less latency on signals and less traffic on SER. My
question is, from the experience of other guys here, what do you
think is the drawback or advantages of using SIPROXD together with
SER to solve SIP NAT issues compared to other methods like using
mediaproxy and rtpproxy?Will I still be able to do other SER
features like accounting?
Thanks!
_jeff
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers