8 Nov
2003
8 Nov
'03
5:27 p.m.
Hi,
I tried to include the voicemail support in my running config, but I'm not
getting any voicemail functionality: I call a user which doesn't answer and
I end up with a 404 in all cases.
Prior to adding the voicemail logic, the config file was processing the
requests as intended: numbers beginning with 8 go to IP users, other numbers
go to PSTN gateway.
By adding the vm support I was thinking that users part of voicemail group
will see their received calls transferred to vm after a certain amount of
time (20sec), or if they are not located/registered, their incoming calls
will go to vm directly.
Unfortunately this is not what I'm getting.
In the file the following hosts have this meaning:
Vocal.ipsound.net:5060 SER SERVER
Vocal.ipsound.net:5071 SER SERVER RUNNING FOR VM ONLY as suggested the list.
Running with the config file downloaded from cvs.
Phoenix.tunix.com:5061 PSTN GW
Running ser rel 0.8.11 release
Thanks.
Samy.
9 Nov
9 Nov
9:29 a.m.
Hello,
what exactly means "a user which doesn't answer" ? Do you mean that the
phone of the user rings and he doesn't pick up or do you mean that his phone
is offline and deoesn't respond to INVITE ?
Jan.
On 08-11 17:27, Samy Touati wrote:
Hi,
I tried to include the voicemail support in my running config, but I'm not
getting any voicemail functionality: I call a user which doesn't answer and
I end up with a 404 in all cases.
Prior to adding the voicemail logic, the config file was processing the
requests as intended: numbers beginning with 8 go to IP users, other numbers
go to PSTN gateway.
By adding the vm support I was thinking that users part of voicemail group
will see their received calls transferred to vm after a certain amount of
time (20sec), or if they are not located/registered, their incoming calls
will go to vm directly.
Unfortunately this is not what I'm getting.
In the file the following hosts have this meaning:
Vocal.ipsound.net:5060 SER SERVER
Vocal.ipsound.net:5071 SER SERVER RUNNING FOR VM ONLY as suggested the list.
Running with the config file downloaded from cvs.
Phoenix.tunix.com:5061 PSTN GW
Running ser rel 0.8.11 release
Thanks.
Samy.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
12:46 p.m.
Hi,
Both cases, I want to have the ring timeout after 20 secs, and see the
caller being forwarded to vm and leave a message. I also want to see if
It's possible to forward to vm if a phone is not registered with ser (phone
off for example).
I was thinking that my config file would support both of these scenarios.
I'm using ser-0.8.11 downloaded as released version in august.
I downloaded ser 0.8.11 last night and started the build process but still
haven't installed it. I'm wondering if my config file is ok and it's a
matter of having an old ser/sems release or is there something wrong with my
config file.
Thanks again for any help.
Samy.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 9:29 AM
To: Samy Touati
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] voicemail not working
Hello,
what exactly means "a user which doesn't answer" ? Do you mean that the
phone of the user rings and he doesn't pick up or do you mean that his phone
is offline and deoesn't respond to INVITE ?
Jan.
On 08-11 17:27, Samy Touati wrote:
Hi,
I tried to include the voicemail support in my running config, but I'm not
getting any voicemail functionality: I call a user which doesn't answer
and
I end up with a 404 in all cases.
Prior to adding the voicemail logic, the config file was processing the
requests as intended: numbers beginning with 8 go to IP users, other
numbers
go to PSTN gateway.
By adding the vm support I was thinking that users part of voicemail group
will see their received calls transferred to vm after a certain amount of
time (20sec), or if they are not located/registered, their incoming calls
will go to vm directly.
Unfortunately this is not what I'm getting.
In the file the following hosts have this meaning:
Vocal.ipsound.net:5060 SER SERVER
Vocal.ipsound.net:5071 SER SERVER RUNNING FOR VM ONLY as suggested the
list.
Running with the config file downloaded from cvs.
Phoenix.tunix.com:5061 PSTN GW
Running ser rel 0.8.11 release
Thanks.
Samy.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
10 Nov
10 Nov
7:52 a.m.
From earlier posts:
The mode we built is running SER at a separate place than voicemail,
i.e., once SER as proxy, once SER as SEMS front-end, possibly at
the same host but at different port-numbers.
One-SER-only is workable too for off-line users, but I'm not sure
it is workable for failed called attemps (failur_routes in script).
I promised to look at it as time allow -- that still holds, the time
just has not allowed yet ;)
----
In response for frequent questions how to configure SER to operate
as voicemail2email server, I created an example file. Note that this
example operates as a stand-alone UAS, i.e., the configuration does
not operate in proxy mode -- it needs a proxy fronting it. (I will
try to look at the combined mode too, as soon as time allows.) Also,
the example needs to have sems up and running.
The example is on our CVS, see
http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ser/sip_router/example…
--
here it is, an example config file for the proxy server serving
a separate voicemail server:
http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/examples/vm_proxy.…
---
Is there a config file example that support PSTN
forwarding as well as vm support for the users ?
there is a separate example, examples/pstn.cfg in our source tree.
-jiri
At 06:46 PM 11/9/2003, Samy Touati wrote:
Hi,
Both cases, I want to have the ring timeout after 20 secs, and see the
caller being forwarded to vm and leave a message. I also want to see if
It's possible to forward to vm if a phone is not registered with ser (phone
off for example).
I was thinking that my config file would support both of these scenarios.
I'm using ser-0.8.11 downloaded as released version in august.
I downloaded ser 0.8.11 last night and started the build process but still
haven't installed it. I'm wondering if my config file is ok and it's a
matter of having an old ser/sems release or is there something wrong with my
config file.
Thanks again for any help.
Samy.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 9:29 AM
To: Samy Touati
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] voicemail not working
Hello,
what exactly means "a user which doesn't answer" ? Do you mean that the
phone of the user rings and he doesn't pick up or do you mean that his phone
is offline and deoesn't respond to INVITE ?
Jan.
On 08-11 17:27, Samy Touati wrote:
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Hi,
I tried to include the voicemail support in my running config, but I'm not
getting any voicemail functionality: I call a user which doesn't answer
and
I end up with a 404 in all cases.
Prior to adding the voicemail logic, the config file was processing the
requests as intended: numbers beginning with 8 go to IP users, other
numbers
go to PSTN gateway.
By adding the vm support I was thinking that users part of voicemail group
will see their received calls transferred to vm after a certain amount of
time (20sec), or if they are not located/registered, their incoming calls
will go to vm directly.
Unfortunately this is not what I'm getting.
In the file the following hosts have this meaning:
Vocal.ipsound.net:5060 SER SERVER
Vocal.ipsound.net:5071 SER SERVER RUNNING FOR VM ONLY as suggested the
list.
Running with the config file downloaded from
cvs.
Phoenix.tunix.com:5061 PSTN GW
Running ser rel 0.8.11 release
Thanks.
Samy.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
7690
days inactive
7692
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Jan Janak -
Jiri Kuthan -
Samy Touati