Check the request uri after lookup, right before t_relay().
(uri=~"^.*@10\..*") As long as you don't have nated clients (and thus
don't use fix_nated_register()) the request uri will contain the actual
IP address.
g-)
İlker Aktuna (
Hi,
In fact my network is not 10.0.0.0 ; that was just an example (bad
example).
The network addresses are specific public network addresses (lets say
3 different C Class network) and has no relation to NAT.
That's why I need to check the IP adrresses (from and to) of the SIP
message before deciding if it should use mediaproxy or not.
Any idea how to do that ?
Soruce address can be checked as :
if (src_ip="195.1.1.+") {
}
but that won't be same for destination address as "dst_ip" is the SER
server ip.
How can I check the ip address of the client that the SIP message will
be forwarded ?
Thanks,
ilker
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 20, 2006 10:26 PM
*To:* İlker Aktuna (
Koç.net)
*Cc:* serusers(a)iptel.org
*Subject:* Re: [Serusers] checking source ip and dest ip
Yes, and your network is in the RFC1918 (private) address space, so
you can use the same logic (even without change as you want to proxy
when the address is on your network).
g-)
İlker Aktuna (
Koç.net) wrote:
> In fact, I am not looking for "if address is NATed or not", I need to
> check if address belongs to my network or not.
>
> what do you mean by RFC1918 addresses ?
>
> Thanks,
> ilker
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:40 PM
> *To:* İlker Aktuna (
Koç.net)
> *Cc:* serusers(a)iptel.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Serusers] checking source ip and dest ip
>
> Why not test for RFC1918 addresses? That's what the
onsip.org
> nat-handling scripts do. A NATed destination is determined by a flag
> in the location record and the src ip is checked with
> nat_uac_test(). It will give a more robust NAT handling that testing
> on IP addresses for parts of the RFC1918 addresses.
> The problem has already been solved, why not reuse? ;-)
> g-)
>
> İlker Aktuna (
Koç.net) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to check source ip of a SIP message and also destination IP
>> to which the message will be sent.
>> i.e. I will use mediaproxy only if the one of the ip addresses match
>> 10.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
>>
>> is it possible ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ilker
>> C "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
>> In fact, I am not looking for "if address is NATed or not", I need
>> to check if address belongs to my network or not.
>>
>> what do you mean by RFC1918 addresses ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ilker
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:40 PM
>> *To:* İlker Aktuna (
Koç.net)
>> *Cc:* serusers(a)iptel.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [Serusers] checking source ip and dest ip
>>
>> Why not test for RFC1918 addresses? That's what the
onsip.org
>> nat-handling scripts do. A NATed destination is determined by a flag
>> in the location record and the src ip is checked with
>> nat_uac_test(). It will give a more robust NAT handling that
>> testing on IP addresses for parts of the RFC1918 addresses.
>> The problem has already been solved, why not reuse? ;-)
>> g-)
>>
>> İlker Aktuna (
Koç.net) wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I need to check source ip of a SIP message and also destination IP
>>> to which the message will be sent.
>>> i.e. I will use mediaproxy only if the one of the ip addresses
>>> match 10.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
>>>
>>> is it possible ?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> ilker
>>> C "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In fact my network is not 10.0.0.0 ; that was just an example (bad
>>> example).
>>> The network addresses are specific public network addresses (lets
>>> say 3 different C Class network) and has no relation to NAT.
>>> That's why I need to check the IP adrresses (from and to) of the
>>> SIP message before deciding if it should use mediaproxy or not.
>>>
>>> Any idea how to do that ?
>>>
>>> Soruce address can be checked as :
>>>
>>> if (src_ip="195.1.1.+") {
>>> }
>>>
>>> but that won't be same for destination address as "dst_ip" is
the
>>> SER server ip.
>>>
>>> How can I check the ip address of the client that the SIP message
>>> will be forwarded ?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> ilker
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 20, 2006 10:26 PM
>>> *To:* İlker Aktuna (
Koç.net)
>>> *Cc:* serusers(a)iptel.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Serusers] checking source ip and dest ip
>>>
>>> Yes, and your network is in the RFC1918 (private) address space, so
>>> you can use the same logic (even without change as you want to
>>> proxy when the address is on your network).
>>> g-)
>>>
>>> İlker Aktuna (
Koç.net) wrote:
>>>> In fact, I am not looking for "if address is NATed or not", I
need
>>>> to check if address belongs to my network or not.
>>>>
>>>> what do you mean by RFC1918 addresses ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> ilker
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> *From:* Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:40 PM
>>>> *To:* İlker Aktuna (
Koç.net)
>>>> *Cc:* serusers(a)iptel.org
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Serusers] checking source ip and dest ip
>>>>
>>>> Why not test for RFC1918 addresses? That's what the
onsip.org
>>>> nat-handling scripts do. A NATed destination is determined by a
>>>> flag in the location record and the src ip is checked with
>>>> nat_uac_test(). It will give a more robust NAT handling that
>>>> testing on IP addresses for parts of the RFC1918 addresses.
>>>> The problem has already been solved, why not reuse? ;-)
>>>> g-)
>>>>
>>>> İlker Aktuna (
Koç.net) wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I need to check source ip of a SIP message and also destination
>>>>> IP to which the message will be sent.
>>>>> i.e. I will use mediaproxy only if the one of the ip addresses
>>>>> match 10.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
>>>>>
>>>>> is it possible ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> ilker
>>>>> C "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
>>>>> In fact, I am not looking for "if address is NATed or not",
I
>>>>> need to check if address belongs to my network or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> what do you mean by RFC1918 addresses ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> ilker
>>>>>
>>>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> *From:* Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:40 PM
>>>>> *To:* İlker Aktuna (
Koç.net)
>>>>> *Cc:* serusers(a)iptel.org
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Serusers] checking source ip and dest ip
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not test for RFC1918 addresses? That's what the
onsip.org
>>>>> nat-handling scripts do. A NATed destination is determined by a
>>>>> flag in the location record and the src ip is checked with
>>>>> nat_uac_test(). It will give a more robust NAT handling that
>>>>> testing on IP addresses for parts of the RFC1918 addresses.
>>>>> The problem has already been solved, why not reuse? ;-)
>>>>> g-)
>>>>>
>>>>> İlker Aktuna (
Koç.net) wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I need to check source ip of a SIP message and also destination
>>>>>> IP to which the message will be sent.
>>>>>> i.e. I will use mediaproxy only if the one of the ip addresses
>>>>>> match 10.0.0.0 / 255.0.0.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is it possible ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> ilker
>>>
>>>
>>>
<http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/0B01060D/07044C00/09080544/0018918210.jpg>
>>>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>>> Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor
>>> olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa,
>>> icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari
>>> acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen
>>> geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu
>>> e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin
>>> cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta
>>> mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan
>>> taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma
>>> sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini
>>> garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir
>>> sorumlulugu kabul etmez.
>>> This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or
>>> entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential
>>> information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message
>>> or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making
>>> any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that
>>> case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message
>>> to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail
>>> message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This
>>> e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the
>>> presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot
>>> warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be
>>> present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence.
>>>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________