Hi
The From request in REGISTER and INVITE, what should be in the domain segment of it, should it be, the IP address of the UA, the proxy or what, I seem to be getting conflicting results with a quintum, and wanted to double check
Iqbal
The From: header should contain the AoR (the canonical sip URI, the public known SIP URI), e.g: klaus3002@iptel.org
regards klaus
Iqbal wrote:
Hi
The From request in REGISTER and INVITE, what should be in the domain segment of it, should it be, the IP address of the UA, the proxy or what, I seem to be getting conflicting results with a quintum, and wanted to double check
Iqbal
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
just what I thought, so basically the proxy FQDN of the proxy the UA is attached to, which is why I am wondering why quintum sends it own IP address
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
The From: header should contain the AoR (the canonical sip URI, the public known SIP URI), e.g: klaus3002@iptel.org
regards klaus
Iqbal wrote:
Hi
The From request in REGISTER and INVITE, what should be in the domain segment of it, should it be, the IP address of the UA, the proxy or what, I seem to be getting conflicting results with a quintum, and wanted to double check
Iqbal
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.
If the quinntum box is not registered to a proxy, but a "standalone" SIP device, than it is fine for the box to use its IP address (as this is the SIP URI where it can be reached from outside).
klaus
Iqbal wrote:
just what I thought, so basically the proxy FQDN of the proxy the UA is attached to, which is why I am wondering why quintum sends it own IP address
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
The From: header should contain the AoR (the canonical sip URI, the public known SIP URI), e.g: klaus3002@iptel.org
regards klaus
Iqbal wrote:
Hi
The From request in REGISTER and INVITE, what should be in the domain segment of it, should it be, the IP address of the UA, the proxy or what, I seem to be getting conflicting results with a quintum, and wanted to double check
Iqbal
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.
its REGISTER to the proxy
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
If the quinntum box is not registered to a proxy, but a "standalone" SIP device, than it is fine for the box to use its IP address (as this is the SIP URI where it can be reached from outside).
klaus
Iqbal wrote:
just what I thought, so basically the proxy FQDN of the proxy the UA is attached to, which is why I am wondering why quintum sends it own IP address
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
The From: header should contain the AoR (the canonical sip URI, the public known SIP URI), e.g: klaus3002@iptel.org
regards klaus
Iqbal wrote:
Hi
The From request in REGISTER and INVITE, what should be in the domain segment of it, should it be, the IP address of the UA, the proxy or what, I seem to be getting conflicting results with a quintum, and wanted to double check
Iqbal
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.
.
Interesting. I have a number of Quintum PSTN gateways that I'm trying to pass traffic through using SER and I am having a heck of a time with the configuration. Asterisk works fine but not scaleable enough. My UAC's are behind different NAT routers and some work with rtpproxy and some don't. Some work (Linksys) with just nathelper but wouldn't work with rtpproxy. Does anyone have a good experience with SER and Quintum? I would like to share info and experience.
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Iqbal Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 1:28 PM To: Klaus Darilion Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] From header
its REGISTER to the proxy
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
If the quinntum box is not registered to a proxy, but a "standalone" SIP device, than it is fine for the box to use its IP address (as this is the SIP URI where it can be reached from outside).
klaus
Iqbal wrote:
just what I thought, so basically the proxy FQDN of the proxy the UA is attached to, which is why I am wondering why quintum sends it own IP address
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
The From: header should contain the AoR (the canonical sip URI, the public known SIP URI), e.g: klaus3002@iptel.org
regards klaus
Iqbal wrote:
Hi
The From request in REGISTER and INVITE, what should be in the domain segment of it, should it be, the IP address of the UA, the proxy or what, I seem to be getting conflicting results with a quintum, and wanted to double check
Iqbal
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.
.
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
join the club, I have just got the REGISTER and call connected and I hear voice, but now have found tha the Route fields are incorrect or are not working as they should, need a few more debugs, which quintums have you managed to get working.
Iqbal
Rick Thompson wrote:
Interesting. I have a number of Quintum PSTN gateways that I'm trying to pass traffic through using SER and I am having a heck of a time with the configuration. Asterisk works fine but not scaleable enough. My UAC's are behind different NAT routers and some work with rtpproxy and some don't. Some work (Linksys) with just nathelper but wouldn't work with rtpproxy. Does anyone have a good experience with SER and Quintum? I would like to share info and experience.
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Iqbal Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 1:28 PM To: Klaus Darilion Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] From header
its REGISTER to the proxy
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
If the quinntum box is not registered to a proxy, but a "standalone" SIP device, than it is fine for the box to use its IP address (as this is the SIP URI where it can be reached from outside).
klaus
Iqbal wrote:
just what I thought, so basically the proxy FQDN of the proxy the UA is attached to, which is why I am wondering why quintum sends it own IP address
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
The From: header should contain the AoR (the canonical sip URI, the public known SIP URI), e.g: klaus3002@iptel.org
regards klaus
Iqbal wrote:
Hi
The From request in REGISTER and INVITE, what should be in the domain segment of it, should it be, the IP address of the UA, the proxy or what, I seem to be getting conflicting results with a quintum, and wanted to double check
Iqbal
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.
.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.
I have a Quintum call relay server running packet saver, a BIG Tenor CMS and three DX4120 . They don't register into the SER I just route calls to them using rewritehostport. I use asterisk for IVR and VM.
-----Original Message----- From: Iqbal [mailto:iqbal@gigo.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 2:19 PM To: Rick Thompson Cc: 'Klaus Darilion'; serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] From header
join the club, I have just got the REGISTER and call connected and I hear voice, but now have found tha the Route fields are incorrect or are not working as they should, need a few more debugs, which quintums have you managed to get working.
Iqbal
Rick Thompson wrote:
Interesting. I have a number of Quintum PSTN gateways that I'm trying to pass traffic through using SER and I am having a heck of a time with the configuration. Asterisk works fine but not scaleable enough. My UAC's are behind different NAT routers and some work with rtpproxy and some don't. Some work (Linksys) with just nathelper but wouldn't work with rtpproxy. Does anyone have a good experience with SER and Quintum? I would like to share info and experience.
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Iqbal Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 1:28 PM To: Klaus Darilion Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] From header
its REGISTER to the proxy
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
If the quinntum box is not registered to a proxy, but a "standalone" SIP device, than it is fine for the box to use its IP address (as this is the SIP URI where it can be reached from outside).
klaus
Iqbal wrote:
just what I thought, so basically the proxy FQDN of the proxy the UA is attached to, which is why I am wondering why quintum sends it own IP address
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
The From: header should contain the AoR (the canonical sip URI, the public known SIP URI), e.g: klaus3002@iptel.org
regards klaus
Iqbal wrote:
Hi
The From request in REGISTER and INVITE, what should be in the domain segment of it, should it be, the IP address of the UA, the proxy or what, I seem to be getting conflicting results with a quintum, and wanted to double check
Iqbal
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.
.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.
Got Quntum Asterisk and SER working together happily - ASM200, AXM800, CMS.
Happy to share. Been a real pain making calls work and the Quintum Failover too. But all hanging together for my service.
Neill....;o)
Neill Wilkinson Senior Consultant Quortex Consultants Ltd e: neill.wilkinson@quortex.com w: www.quortex.com
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Rick Thompson Sent: 06 September 2005 18:59 To: 'Iqbal'; 'Klaus Darilion' Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] From header
Interesting. I have a number of Quintum PSTN gateways that I'm trying to pass traffic through using SER and I am having a heck of a time with the configuration. Asterisk works fine but not scaleable enough. My UAC's are behind different NAT routers and some work with rtpproxy and some don't. Some work (Linksys) with just nathelper but wouldn't work with rtpproxy. Does anyone have a good experience with SER and Quintum? I would like to share info and experience.
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Iqbal Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 1:28 PM To: Klaus Darilion Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] From header
its REGISTER to the proxy
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
If the quinntum box is not registered to a proxy, but a "standalone" SIP device, than it is fine for the box to use its IP address (as this is the SIP URI where it can be reached from outside).
klaus
Iqbal wrote:
just what I thought, so basically the proxy FQDN of the proxy the UA is attached to, which is why I am wondering why quintum sends it own IP address
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
The From: header should contain the AoR (the canonical sip URI, the public known SIP URI), e.g: klaus3002@iptel.org
regards klaus
Iqbal wrote:
Hi
The From request in REGISTER and INVITE, what should be in the domain segment of it, should it be, the IP address of the UA, the proxy or what, I seem to be getting conflicting results with a quintum, and wanted to double check
Iqbal
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.
.
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0537-1, 14/09/2005 Tested on: 18/09/2005 12:29:25 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2004 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com
Hey
I have tested Quintum..Analog and Digital both...Digital has no issues now while Analog boxes give you pain. Talk to Quintum...these guys are real nice to respond.
From: "Neill Wilkinson" neill.wilkinson@btinternet.com To: "'Rick Thompson'" rthompson@vir2com.com,"'Iqbal'" iqbal@gigo.co.uk,"'Klaus Darilion'" klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at CC: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] From header Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:29:24 +0100
Got Quntum Asterisk and SER working together happily - ASM200, AXM800, CMS.
Happy to share. Been a real pain making calls work and the Quintum Failover too. But all hanging together for my service.
Neill....;o)
Neill Wilkinson Senior Consultant Quortex Consultants Ltd e: neill.wilkinson@quortex.com w: www.quortex.com
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Rick Thompson Sent: 06 September 2005 18:59 To: 'Iqbal'; 'Klaus Darilion' Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] From header
Interesting. I have a number of Quintum PSTN gateways that I'm trying to pass traffic through using SER and I am having a heck of a time with the configuration. Asterisk works fine but not scaleable enough. My UAC's are behind different NAT routers and some work with rtpproxy and some don't. Some work (Linksys) with just nathelper but wouldn't work with rtpproxy. Does anyone have a good experience with SER and Quintum? I would like to share info and experience.
-----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces@iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Iqbal Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 1:28 PM To: Klaus Darilion Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] From header
its REGISTER to the proxy
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
If the quinntum box is not registered to a proxy, but a "standalone" SIP device, than it is fine for the box to use its IP address (as this is the SIP URI where it can be reached from outside).
klaus
Iqbal wrote:
just what I thought, so basically the proxy FQDN of the proxy the UA is attached to, which is why I am wondering why quintum sends it own IP address
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
The From: header should contain the AoR (the canonical sip URI, the public known SIP URI), e.g: klaus3002@iptel.org
regards klaus
Iqbal wrote:
Hi
The From request in REGISTER and INVITE, what should be in the domain segment of it, should it be, the IP address of the UA, the proxy or what, I seem to be getting conflicting results with a quintum, and wanted to double check
Iqbal
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.
.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0537-1, 14/09/2005 Tested on: 18/09/2005 12:29:25 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2004 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_________________________________________________________________ Win 5 Gold Coins & prizes worth Lakhs on eBay. http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/4686-26272-10936-630?ck=GoldRush Register Now!
-
Iqbal -
Kapil Dhawan -
Klaus Darilion -
Neill Wilkinson -
Rick Thompson