Hi, http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2003-April/000019.html (text copied below) says that the rport functionality in ser-cvs-version at that time was not correct. I have a simple question related to that: - Is the rport functionality correct in ser-0.8.10, or is the same problem present there ? (The "ISSUES" file does not mention any problems related to rport for any ser release, but I want to be sure) /Lasse ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2003-April/000019.html> follows: [Serdev] Re: received-rport in SER ? Jiri Kuthan jiri(a)iptel.org Fri, 04 Apr 2003 18:57:34 +0200 Previous message: [Serdev] Re: Accounting module mods with MySQL and SERWEB Next message: [Serdev] RE: [Serusers] Accounting Script Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Hopefuly, it is now fixed on CVS. We haven't tested too much yet, though. -Jiri At 12:37 AM 4/2/2003, Maxim Sobolev wrote: mailing lists of SER, and I found some interesting mails about the same issue from you append an empty "rport" in the Via header, the server fills the Via header with the correct values of "rport" and "received", but the packet is sent back to the "received" IP BUT to the port scpecified in the Via header instead of the "rport" port. using a symmetric NAT ( althought the return IP address is correct), because SER sents the UDP packet to a internal port. to fix it or know someone that have tried to solve this issue ? -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers