There is no explicit support for callerprefs. I think though that most of the scenarios they are goof for could be achieved using textops and selects+AVP processing.
-jiri
At 15:40 18/10/2007, Stefan.Brozinski@materna.de wrote:
Hello everybody
are there any plans to support RFC 3841 in SER?
Specifically, I am looking at the 'Accept-Contact' and the 'Request-Disposition' header fields.
Thanks Stefan _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Jiri,
does that mean that there are no plans to support RFC 3841?
This is sad because 3GPP's CSCFs require these headers, and the OpenIMSCore project uses SER to implement its CSCFs.
Regards Stefan
-----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:03 PM To: Brozinski, Stefan; serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] RFC 3841 support?
There is no explicit support for callerprefs. I think though that most of the scenarios they are goof for could be achieved using textops and selects+AVP processing.
-jiri
At 15:40 18/10/2007, Stefan.Brozinski@materna.de wrote:
Hello everybody
are there any plans to support RFC 3841 in SER?
Specifically, I am looking at the 'Accept-Contact' and the 'Request-Disposition' header fields.
Thanks Stefan _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
3841 is a draft of a possible standard. While it might be supported at some point (and you're welcome to write it... remember, SER's an open-source product), I think it's a better idea to focus on the core SIP stuff first, and then worry about the 60-70+ draft additions that 'everyone just has to have.' Who knows? By then, it might even be standardised. :)
N.
Stefan.Brozinski@materna.de wrote:
Jiri,
does that mean that there are no plans to support RFC 3841?
This is sad because 3GPP's CSCFs require these headers, and the OpenIMSCore project uses SER to implement its CSCFs.
Regards Stefan
-----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:03 PM To: Brozinski, Stefan; serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] RFC 3841 support?
There is no explicit support for callerprefs. I think though that most of the scenarios they are goof for could be achieved using textops and selects+AVP processing.
-jiri
At 15:40 18/10/2007, Stefan.Brozinski@materna.de wrote:
Hello everybody
are there any plans to support RFC 3841 in SER?
Specifically, I am looking at the 'Accept-Contact' and the 'Request-Disposition' header fields.
Thanks Stefan _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
3841 is a draft of a possible standard.
This is an interesting statement. Where did you find this information?
I looked at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3841.txt (no surprise) and can't find anything about a "draft" status.
Regards Stefan
-----Original Message----- From: SIP [mailto:sip@arcdiv.com] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 6:51 PM To: Brozinski, Stefan Cc: jiri@iptel.org; serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] RFC 3841 support?
3841 is a draft of a possible standard. While it might be supported at some point (and you're welcome to write it... remember, SER's an open-source product), I think it's a better idea to focus on the core SIP stuff first, and then worry about the 60-70+ draft additions that 'everyone just has to have.' Who knows? By then, it might even be standardised. :)
N.
Stefan.Brozinski@materna.de wrote:
Jiri,
does that mean that there are no plans to support RFC 3841?
This is sad because 3GPP's CSCFs require these headers, and the OpenIMSCore project uses SER to implement its CSCFs.
Regards Stefan
-----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:03 PM To: Brozinski, Stefan; serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] RFC 3841 support?
There is no explicit support for callerprefs. I think though that most of the scenarios they are goof for could be achieved using textops and selects+AVP processing.
-jiri
At 15:40 18/10/2007, Stefan.Brozinski@materna.de wrote:
Hello everybody
are there any plans to support RFC 3841 in SER?
Specifically, I am looking at the 'Accept-Contact' and the 'Request-Disposition' header fields.
Thanks Stefan _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
I'm sorry.... not even draft status yet. It's still only proposed.
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcxx00.html#Proposed
Latest issuance of the Official Internet Protocol Standards.
N.
Stefan.Brozinski@materna.de wrote:
3841 is a draft of a possible standard.
This is an interesting statement. Where did you find this information?
I looked at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3841.txt (no surprise) and can't find anything about a "draft" status.
Regards Stefan
-----Original Message----- From: SIP [mailto:sip@arcdiv.com] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 6:51 PM To: Brozinski, Stefan Cc: jiri@iptel.org; serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] RFC 3841 support?
3841 is a draft of a possible standard. While it might be supported at some point (and you're welcome to write it... remember, SER's an open-source product), I think it's a better idea to focus on the core SIP stuff first, and then worry about the 60-70+ draft additions that 'everyone just has to have.' Who knows? By then, it might even be standardised. :)
N.
Stefan.Brozinski@materna.de wrote:
Jiri,
does that mean that there are no plans to support RFC 3841?
This is sad because 3GPP's CSCFs require these headers, and the OpenIMSCore project uses SER to implement its CSCFs.
Regards Stefan
-----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:03 PM To: Brozinski, Stefan; serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] RFC 3841 support?
There is no explicit support for callerprefs. I think though that most of the scenarios they are goof for could be achieved using textops and selects+AVP processing.
-jiri
At 15:40 18/10/2007, Stefan.Brozinski@materna.de wrote:
Hello everybody
are there any plans to support RFC 3841 in SER?
Specifically, I am looking at the 'Accept-Contact' and the 'Request-Disposition' header fields.
Thanks Stefan _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
SIP wrote:
I'm sorry.... not even draft status yet. It's still only proposed.
Ok, so we have to stop working on RFC 3261 as well? It is listed in the same category...
Seriously: There are different classes of RFCs. Only few are stable enough to get the highest merits of being an Internet Standard (those that have a STDxxx number). If you look at that list, even HTTP is only Draft Standard (be careful not to interfere this with an Internet-Draft---those documents beginning with draft-* can change very often and do not have any official status).
Regards, Olaf