Hi,
as Dilyan mention start small and test and then grow if needed in your
config.
The loop over is for example not needed if you switch on parallel forking.
Then you have new issues with correct branch settings to rtpengine.
And a good idea for webrtc is havfos example
Kind Regards
Karsten Horsmann
Дилян Палаузов <dpa-kamailio(a)bapha.be> schrieb am Di., 9. Mai 2023, 22:41:
Hello,
I suggest to call from WebRTC a non-WebRTC client, talk and then the
non-WebRTC client hangs up. Check if the WebRTC client gets the BYE.
Once this simple scenario works, you can try the more complicated scenario
explained by you.
In my experiments the BYE was not received with topoh. Without topoh it
works.
Greetings
Dilyan
-----Original Message-----
From: shwetank singh <shwetank.singh1(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
To: sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Subject: [SR-Users] using kamailio to send invite to webrtc clients (with
freeswitch)
Date: 05/09/2023 07:22:40 PM
Hello experts
I have a setup where webrtc client registrations (from behind a NAT / VPN)
are on kamailio and the INVITE to begin a call is sent by freeswitch to
kamailio which is then expected to relay it to the subscribed webrtc
client.
i understand, from documentation and general thinking, that kamailio
cannot open a new connection to such a client and should reuse an open
connection
(a websocket in my case).
i have setup kamailio as generic as it may sound and expect t_relay() to
do the magic of forwarding the invite, however, from logs i don't see
anything indicating kamailio is using any existing connection and hence my
outgoing invite requests are stuck showing pointed towards a vpn gateway
which was the registered "location" of client (which is the public ip of
VPN gateway)
please advise what relevant information can i produce here to make the
query more readable and clear.
headed here after trying just about all the resources available on the
topic.
e.g. if my location record looks like
AoR: 1004(a)mydomain.com
Contacts:
- Contact:
Address: sip:1004@11.22.33.44:49179
CFlags: 64
CSeq: 3087
Call-ID: 189jss21e24ntve1ggsuli
Expires: 593
Flags: 0
Instance: <urn:uuid:8a936bbc-514f-4755-bed0-edc644dd4453>
KA-Roundtrip: 0
Keepalive: 1
Last-Keepalive: 1683652755
Last-Modified: 1683652755
Methods: 7071
Path: <sip:10.10.6.196:3040;received=sip:mydomain.com
;lr;nat=yes>
Q: -1
Received: sip:11.22.33.44:49179;transport=ws
Reg-Id: 1
Ruid: uloc-645601c4-131220-3764
Server-Id: 0
Socket: tls:1.2.3.4:4443
State: CS_SYNC
Tcpconn-Id: 3916
User-Agent: JsSIP 3.9.0
i try to lookup the location and find the address, and then route to that
address by setting $ru
in sngrep it does show that kamailio is trying to send INVITE to
11.22.33.44:port (which is the VPN gateway) but it isn't exactly clear
from logs if
this is being done over an existing connection.
how does kamailio identify if a connection exists for a user (for each
contact in AOR, if multiple contacts exist for a user -- i.e. different
browser
sessions?)
if(reg_fetch_contacts("location", "$ru", "caller")) {
$var(i) = 0;
while($var(i) < $(ulc(caller=>count)))
{
$ru = $(ulc(caller=>addr)[$var(i)]);
$var(i) = $var(i) + 1;
setflag(FLT_DLGINFO);
dlg_manage();
t_relay();
}
}
--
Shwetank
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: