13 Nov
2008
13 Nov
'08
5:54 a.m.
hello
I have been struggling to get the grasp on kamailio for weeks now. My prob is not
understanding the call flow but how to translate it using the functions provided by the
modules and the core. I do not have clear the scope or reach of several functions,provided
by either the core or the modules.
Example:
Register with Auth:
1- user sends REGISTER request w/o the encripted credentials
2- kamailio answers with 401 and sends the challenge
3- the uac sends the REGISTER again, this time with the right credentials and after
verifying kamailio sends 200 OK
4- if the user is behind a NAT we can fix the contact info before saving it to the
location db.
With the help of the forum and the tutorials I have found in the internet I have been able
to accomplish it with these
commands:
route{
if (uri==myself) {
if (method=="REGISTER") {
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: starting to process
REGISTER.Info.\n");
if (!www_authorize("", "subscriber")) {
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: REGISTER came without auth,
sending challenge.\n");
www_challenge("", "0");
exit;
};
if (nat_uac_test("1")){
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: REGISTER-Device behind
NAT.\n");
fix_nated_register();
}
force_rport();
save("location");
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: save-location
successful.\n");
exit;
}
route(1);
}
route[1] {
if (t_relay()) {
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: Route 1 section. Method
[$rm].");
} else {
sl_reply_error();
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: Route 1 section. T_Relay failed.
Method [$rm].");
};
exit;
}
but here come the first questions:
1- when the uac sends the first REGISTER, the function www_challenge() is the one that
actually sends the "401" message?
or the "exit" just exit out the "if" block and the script will
continue with route(1) which in turns executes "t_relay()?
++from the doc, www_challenge() function++++
The function challenges a user agent. It will generate a WWW-Authorize header field
containing a digest challenge, it
will put the header field into a response generated from the request the server is
processing and send the reply.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2- the "exit" after the save("location") function I assume would stop
the execution of the script and at that point kamailio
responds with "200 ok"? or just exit out the "if" block, the script
then reaches the "route(1)" section and the "t_relay()"
sends the "200 ok"?
++ from the doc, core-cookbook, exit() function+++++++
Stop the execution of the configuration script – it has the same behaviour as return(0).
It does not affect the
implicit action to be taken after script execution.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3- the "t_relay" function: does that function creates and sends the approriate
response for each request?
ex1: an INVITE is received, does t_relay() "know" that it can send "100
trying" automatically?
ex2: a "200 OK" is received as a response to an INVITE, does t_relay knows that
it has to send an "ACK"?
++++++from the doc, t_relay() funcion ++++++++++
From user's perspective, the major function is
t_relay(). It setup transaction state, absorb retransmissions from upstream,
generate downstream retransmissions and correlate replies to requests.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4- why do I see ";" even after a "}", is it needed sometimes?
5- is "exit" the same as "exit()"?
These may sound like dumb questions for some of the experienced users, but for a newbie
they are not. Also, if this sounds like "
hey, code my config file for me" I assure you that that is not the intended purpose.
I would appreciate any help and thank everybody in advance.
Fabian
_________________________________________________________________
Color coding for safety: Windows Live Hotmail alerts you to suspicious email.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_safety…
13 Nov
13 Nov
11:06 a.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] help understanding kamailio.cfg and processing call flow
1. read the confige file from sipwise.com - IMO it is very self explanatory.
some comments below:
Fabian Borot schrieb:
hello
Register with Auth:
1- user sends REGISTER request w/o the encripted credentials
2- kamailio answers with 401 and sends the challenge
3- the uac sends the REGISTER again, this time with the right
credentials and after verifying kamailio sends 200 OK
4- if the user is behind a NAT we can fix the contact info before saving
it to the location db.
With the help of the forum and the tutorials I have found in the
internet I have been able to accomplish it with these
commands:
route{
if (uri==myself) {
if (method=="REGISTER") {
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: starting to process
REGISTER.Info.\n");
if (!www_authorize("", "subscriber")) {
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: REGISTER came without
auth, sending challenge.\n");
www_challenge("", "0");
exit;
};
if (nat_uac_test("1")){
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: REGISTER-Device behind
NAT.\n");
fix_nated_register();
}
force_rport();
save("location");
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: save-location
successful.\n");
exit;
}
route(1);
}
route[1] {
if (t_relay()) {
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: Route 1 section. Method
[$rm].");
} else {
sl_reply_error();
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: Route 1 section. T_Relay failed.
Method [$rm].");
};
exit;
}
but here come the first questions:
1- when the uac sends the first REGISTER, the function www_challenge()
is the one that actually sends the "401" message?
Yes, it sends 401 and exits immediately. Thus the exit after 401 would
not be needed, but it is good to have it there as it eases reading the
config script.
or the "exit" just exit out the
"if" block and the script will continue
with route(1) which in turns executes "t_relay()?
++from the doc, www_challenge() function++++
The function challenges a user agent. It will generate a WWW-Authorize
header field containing a digest challenge, it
will put the header field into a response generated from the request the
server is processing and send the reply.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2- the "exit" after the save("location") function I assume would stop
the execution of the script and at that point kamailio
responds with "200 ok"? or just exit out the "if" block, the script
then
reaches the "route(1)" section and the "t_relay()"
sends the "200 ok"?
save stores the record and send back 200 OK. But it does not stop
processing. Thus, you MUST have an exit after save().
++ from the doc, core-cookbook, exit() function+++++++
Stop the execution of the configuration script – it has the same
behaviour as return(0). It does not affect the
implicit action to be taken after script execution.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3- the "t_relay" function: does that function creates and sends the
approriate response for each request?
ex1: an INVITE is received, does t_relay() "know" that it can send "100
trying" automatically?
t_relay() sends automatically 100 trying to the caller (except you call
it with some special flags (see README of tm module)) and forwards the
request to the next destination.
ex2: a "200 OK" is received as a response to
an INVITE, does t_relay
knows that it has to send an "ACK"?
No. The proxy does not send ACK. The proxy forwards the response to the
caller. Then the caller will send the ACK which will be forwarded by the
proxy to the callee. For successful call setups the proxy wont send
ACKs. The proxy will send ACK to the callee by itself only if a call
gets cancelled.
++++++from the doc, t_relay() funcion ++++++++++
From user's perspective, the major function is t_relay(). It setup
transaction state, absorb retransmissions from upstream,
generate downstream retransmissions and correlate replies to requests.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4- why do I see ";" even after a "}", is it needed sometimes?
};
is the same as
}
choose the syntax you like
5- is "exit" the same as "exit()"?
I don't know - I always use exit;
Probably exit() is just an alias.
regards
klaus
These may sound like dumb questions for some of the experienced users,
but for a newbie they are not. Also, if this sounds like "
hey, code my config file for me" I assure you that that is not the
intended purpose.
I would appreciate any help and thank everybody in advance.
Fabian
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Color coding for safety: Windows Live Hotmail alerts you to suspicious
email. Sign up today.
<http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_safety_112008>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
4:47 p.m.
New subject: [Kamailio-Users] help understanding kamailio.cfg and processing call flow
thank you fro you help klaus, I did not know about sipwise.com.
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:06:11 +0100
From: klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at
To: fborot(a)hotmail.com
CC: users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] help understanding kamailio.cfg and processing call flow
1. read the confige file from sipwise.com - IMO it is very self explanatory.
some comments below:
Fabian Borot schrieb:
_________________________________________________________________
Color coding for safety: Windows Live Hotmail alerts you to suspicious email.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_safety…
hello
Register with Auth:
1- user sends REGISTER request w/o the encripted credentials
2- kamailio answers with 401 and sends the challenge
3- the uac sends the REGISTER again, this time with the right
credentials and after verifying kamailio sends 200 OK
4- if the user is behind a NAT we can fix the contact info before saving
it to the location db.
With the help of the forum and the tutorials I have found in the
internet I have been able to accomplish it with these
commands:
route{
if (uri==myself) {
if (method=="REGISTER") {
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: starting to process
REGISTER.Info.\n");
if (!www_authorize("", "subscriber")) {
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: REGISTER came without
auth, sending challenge.\n");
www_challenge("", "0");
exit;
};
if (nat_uac_test("1")){
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: REGISTER-Device behind
NAT.\n");
fix_nated_register();
}
force_rport();
save("location");
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: save-location
successful.\n");
exit;
}
route(1);
}
route[1] {
if (t_relay()) {
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: Route 1 section. Method
[$rm].");
} else {
sl_reply_error();
xlog("L_INFO","mylog: Route 1 section. T_Relay failed.
Method [$rm].");
};
exit;
}
but here come the first questions:
1- when the uac sends the first REGISTER, the function www_challenge()
is the one that actually sends the "401" message?
Yes, it sends 401 and exits immediately. Thus the exit after 401 would
not be needed, but it is good to have it there as it eases reading the
config script.
or the "exit" just exit out the
"if" block and the script will continue
with route(1) which in turns executes "t_relay()?
++from the doc, www_challenge() function++++
The function challenges a user agent. It will generate a WWW-Authorize
header field containing a digest challenge, it
will put the header field into a response generated from the request the
server is processing and send the reply.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2- the "exit" after the save("location") function I assume would stop
the execution of the script and at that point kamailio
responds with "200 ok"? or just exit out the "if" block, the script
then
reaches the "route(1)" section and the "t_relay()"
sends the "200 ok"?
save stores the record and send back 200 OK. But it does not stop
processing. Thus, you MUST have an exit after save().
++ from the doc, core-cookbook, exit() function+++++++
Stop the execution of the configuration script – it has the same
behaviour as return(0). It does not affect the
implicit action to be taken after script execution.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3- the "t_relay" function: does that function creates and sends the
approriate response for each request?
ex1: an INVITE is received, does t_relay() "know" that it can send "100
trying" automatically?
t_relay() sends automatically 100 trying to the caller (except you call
it with some special flags (see README of tm module)) and forwards the
request to the next destination.
ex2: a "200 OK" is received as a
response to an INVITE, does t_relay
knows that it has to send an "ACK"?
No. The proxy does not send ACK. The proxy forwards the response to the
caller. Then the caller will send the ACK which will be forwarded by the
proxy to the callee. For successful call setups the proxy wont send
ACKs. The proxy will send ACK to the callee by itself only if a call
gets cancelled.
++++++from the doc, t_relay() funcion ++++++++++
From user's perspective, the major function is t_relay(). It setup
transaction state, absorb retransmissions from upstream,
generate downstream retransmissions and correlate replies to requests.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4- why do I see ";" even after a "}", is it needed sometimes?
};
is the same as
}
choose the syntax you like
5- is "exit" the same as
"exit()"?
I don't know - I always use exit;
Probably exit() is just an alias.
regards
klaus
>
>
> These may sound like dumb questions for some of the experienced users,
> but for a newbie they are not. Also, if this sounds like "
> hey, code my config file for me" I assure you that that is not the
> intended purpose.
> I would appreciate any help and thank everybody in advance.
>
>
> Fabian
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Color coding for safety: Windows Live Hotmail alerts you to suspicious
> email. Sign up today.
>
<http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_safety_112008>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
5859
days inactive
5859
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Fabian Borot -
Klaus Darilion