20 Apr
2010
20 Apr
'10
7:03 p.m.
Hi, I receive a request, append some custom headers and use
"load_gws()" (from LCR module).
If the first gateway fails I do "next_gw()" and this second request to
the second gateway doesn't contain the previously appended custom
headers.
Is it the expected behavior?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
20 Apr
20 Apr
7:20 p.m.
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
Hi, I receive a request, append some custom headers
and use
"load_gws()" (from LCR module).
If the first gateway fails I do "next_gw()" and this second request to
the second gateway doesn't contain the previously appended custom
headers.
Is it the expected behavior?
inaki,
lots of questions. i'll try to answer, but i'm multiplexing with dinner
preparation.
lcr module does nothing to any headers, just destination set. what i
do, i add gw specific headers in branch route block separately for each
gw. if your gws share the headers, you should be able to add them in
route block before starting to call next_gw()s and t_relay().
-- juha
7:46 p.m.
2010/4/20 Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com>om>:
lcr module does nothing to any headers, just
destination set. what i
do, i add gw specific headers in branch route block separately for each
gw. if your gws share the headers, you should be able to add them in
route block before starting to call next_gw()s and t_relay().
Hi, yes, a workaround is adding the headers in branch_route, it works.
However I wonder if the expected behavior is that added headers are
not keep in serial forking. Well, it could make sense. I just want to
confirm.
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
7:53 p.m.
2010/4/20 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>et>:
Hi, yes, a workaround is adding the headers in
branch_route, it works.
However I wonder if the expected behavior is that added headers are
not keep in serial forking. Well, it could make sense. I just want to
confirm.
Issue solved!
The problem is that I was calling t_newtran() at some point in the
script, and as the documentation states:
-------------
1.4.1. t_newtran()
Creates a new transaction, returns a negative value on error. This is
the only way a script can add a new transaction in an atomic way.
Typically, it is used to deploy a UAS.
Warning
NOTE that the changes on the request that are made after this
function call will not be saved into transaction!!!
------------
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
9:33 p.m.
On 04/20/2010 12:46 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/4/20 Juha Heinanen<jh(a)tutpro.com>om>:
I too am surprised by this. It seems to me that if headers are added
prior to forking, then all existing headers--including the appended
ones--should be copied into every new branch.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
1170 Peachtree Street
12th Floor, Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
lcr module does nothing to any headers, just
destination set. what i
do, i add gw specific headers in branch route block separately for each
gw. if your gws share the headers, you should be able to add them in
route block before starting to call next_gw()s and t_relay().
Hi, yes, a workaround is adding the headers in branch_route, it works.
However I wonder if the expected behavior is that added headers are
not keep in serial forking. Well, it could make sense. I just want to
confirm.
21 Apr
21 Apr
12:08 a.m.
2010/4/20 Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>om>:
Hi Alex, read my last mail in this thread in which I explain that the
error occurs since I used t_newtran() at the begining of the script
and then "changes on the request that are made after this
function call will not be saved into transaction!!!" (as the
documentation says).
Regards.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
Hi, yes, a
workaround is adding the headers in branch_route, it works.
However I wonder if the expected behavior is that added headers are
not keep in serial forking. Well, it could make sense. I just want to
confirm.
I too am surprised by this. It seems to me that if headers are added prior
to forking, then all existing headers--including the appended ones--should
be copied into every new branch.
10:53 a.m.
On 04/20/2010 05:08 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/4/20 Alex
Balashov<abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>om>:
Hi Alex, read my last mail in this thread in which I explain that the
error occurs since I used t_newtran() at the begining of the script
and then "changes on the request that are made after this
function call will not be saved into transaction!!!" (as the
documentation says).
Oh. OK, that is clearer. Sorry, I was being dumb.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
1170 Peachtree Street
12th Floor, Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Hi, yes,
a workaround is adding the headers in branch_route, it works.
However I wonder if the expected behavior is that added headers are
not keep in serial forking. Well, it could make sense. I just want to
confirm.
I too am surprised by this. It seems to me that if headers are added prior
to forking, then all existing headers--including the appended ones--should
be copied into every new branch.
5336
days inactive
5337
days old
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alex Balashov -
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
jh＠tutpro.com