13 Mar
2003
13 Mar
'03
10:25 a.m.
Hi,
I think there is a bug in the tm module of he CVS tree:
timer.c line 283:
if (SEND_BUFFER( r_buf )<=0) {
SEND_BUFFER returns -1 on error, and 0 on success, so it should be
if (SEND_BUFFER( r_buf )==-1) {
SER always sends "503 Service Unavailable" respond after sending INVITE
retransmissions in our test environment. Modifying timer.c solved this problem.
I can attach my syslog or udp-log if necessary.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miklos Tirpak
Computer and Automation Research Institute e-mail : mtirpak(a)sztaki.hu
of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences phone : (361) 279-6011
H-1132. Budapest, Victor Hugo u 18-22 fax : (361) 279-6021
13 Mar
13 Mar
1:06 p.m.
On Mar 13, 2003 at 09:25, Tirp?k Mikl?s <mtirpak(a)sztaki.hu> wrote:
Hi,
I think there is a bug in the tm module of he CVS tree:
timer.c line 283:
if (SEND_BUFFER( r_buf )<=0) {
SEND_BUFFER returns -1 on error, and 0 on success, so it should be
if (SEND_BUFFER( r_buf )==-1) {
Yes, you are right. Thanks.
Bug fixed on cvs.
Andrei
16 Mar
16 Mar
2:35 a.m.
At 12:06 PM 3/13/2003, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Mar 13, 2003 at 09:25, Tirp?k Mikl?s
<mtirpak(a)sztaki.hu> wrote:
Just for my understanding -- how come that msg_send can return <=0
and still be ok?
Thanks,
-Jiri
Hi,
I think there is a bug in the tm module of he CVS tree:
timer.c line 283:
if (SEND_BUFFER( r_buf )<=0) {
SEND_BUFFER returns -1 on error, and 0 on success, so it should be
if (SEND_BUFFER( r_buf )==-1) {
Yes, you are right. Thanks.
Bug fixed on cvs.
9:43 p.m.
On Mar 16, 2003 at 01:35, Jiri Kuthan <jiri(a)iptel.org> wrote:
At 12:06 PM 3/13/2003, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
msg_send returns 0 on success and -1 on error.
Andrei
On Mar 13, 2003 at 09:25, Tirp?k Mikl?s
<mtirpak(a)sztaki.hu> wrote:
Just for my understanding -- how come that msg_send can return <=0
and still be ok? Hi,
I think there is a bug in the tm module of he CVS tree:
timer.c line 283:
if (SEND_BUFFER( r_buf )<=0) {
SEND_BUFFER returns -1 on error, and 0 on success, so it should be
if (SEND_BUFFER( r_buf )==-1) {
Yes, you are right. Thanks.
Bug fixed on cvs.
17 Mar
17 Mar
10:34 a.m.
Hi,
The following case occured:
Caller
-
SER
-
Called party
->INVITE->
<-TRYING<-
->INVITE->
->INVITE->
<-TRYING<-
<-RINGING<-
<-503<-
->ACK->
...
I think that the 503 response was caused by the second INVITE of SER. When SER
sended this INVITE the msg_send function returned 0 which means success, but the
tm module processed it as if it were an error. I captured the massages, so I'm
sure the INVITE was sent correctly.
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Mar 16, 2003 at 01:35, Jiri Kuthan
<jiri(a)iptel.org> wrote:
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miklos Tirpak
Computer and Automation Research Institute e-mail : mtirpak(a)sztaki.hu
of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences phone : (361) 279-6011
H-1132. Budapest, Victor Hugo u 18-22 fax : (361) 279-6021
At 12:06 PM 3/13/2003, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
wrote:
msg_send returns 0 on success and -1 on error.
Andrei
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
On Mar 13, 2003 at 09:25, Tirp?k Mikl?s
<mtirpak(a)sztaki.hu> wrote:
Just for my understanding -- how come that msg_send can return <=0
and still be ok? Hi,
I think there is a bug in the tm module of he CVS tree:
timer.c line 283:
if (SEND_BUFFER( r_buf )<=0) {
SEND_BUFFER returns -1 on error, and 0 on success, so it should be
if (SEND_BUFFER( r_buf )==-1) {
Yes, you are right. Thanks.
Bug fixed on cvs.
8:23 p.m.
Thanks, I believed for some unkown reason that msg_send returned number
of bytes sent on success.
-jiri
At 09:34 AM 3/17/2003, Tirpák Miklós wrote:
I think that the 503 response was caused by the second
INVITE of SER. When SER sended this INVITE the msg_send function returned 0 which means
success, but the tm module processed it as if it were an error. I captured the massages,
so I'm sure the INVITE was sent correctly.
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
msg_send returns 0 on success and -1 on error.
7921
days inactive
7925
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul -
Jiri Kuthan -
Tirpák Miklós