Hi Tobias,
not the format is not valid for the RURI.
regards,
bogdan
Tobias Lindgren wrote:
Hi all,
after a patch from one of our providers ACKs started to come with R-URI
looking like:
ACK <sip:192.168.0.1;lr=on;ftag=507454020> SIP/2.0
instead of:
ACK sip:192.168.0.1;lr=on;ftag=507454020 SIP/2.0
like it did before the patch.
The new ACK format gives an error in OpenSER:
Jul 6 11:35:55 ser1 /sbin/openser[9634]: ERROR: parse_uri: bad uri,
state 0 parsed: <<sip> (4) /
<<sip:192.168.0.1;lr=on;ftag=507454020>> (38)
Jul 6 11:35:55 ser1 /sbin/openser[9634]: ERROR: parse_sip_msg_uri: bad
uri <<sip:192.168.0.1;lr=on;ftag=507454020>>
Jul 6 11:35:55 ser1 /sbin/openser[9634]: loose_route: Error while
parsing Request URI
Are the new format of the ACKs valid? With the "<>"? If they are valid,
the problem lies in OpenSER?
Br,
/Tobias
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users