25 Jan
2006
25 Jan
'06
6:30 a.m.
I was able to successfully install SER and I can make calls. But I have two
problems with it, they are
1) Even unregistered Users are able to call out.
2) We have few computers connected via LAN and we are connected to a router. We
have a UNIX box somewhere else on which we installed SER. My problem is from
computers which have indiviual IP are able to make and receive calls but in my
internal network we are having one way problems or sometimes we are unable to
make or recieve calls.
I am attaching my ser.cfg, please check it and help me to solve my problems.
Thanks,
Manoj.
27 Jan
27 Jan
2:19 p.m.
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 05:30, mkumar(a)mantragroup.com wrote:
For #1, I used something like this:
if (method=="INVITE") {
if (!radius_proxy_authorize("")) {
proxy_challenge("", "0");
break;
} else {
record_route();
route(1);
break;
};
};
I was able to successfully install SER and I can make
calls. But I have two
problems with it, they are
1) Even unregistered Users are able to call out.
2) We have few computers connected via LAN and we are connected to a
router. We have a UNIX box somewhere else on which we installed SER. My
problem is from computers which have indiviual IP are able to make and
receive calls but in my internal network we are having one way problems or
sometimes we are unable to make or recieve calls.
I am attaching my ser.cfg, please check it and help me to solve my
problems.
Thanks,
Manoj.
2:31 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] Is SER supposed to send ACK for 2xx response?
Hello,
My setup is for an INVITE session is:
UAC ----> SER -----> UAS
I am using SER is a stateful forwarder (using
t_relay).
I find that when my UAS sends a "200 OK" to my UAC
(via SER), SER does not send an ACK to my UAS.
The 200 message is forwarded correctly to my UAC, but
my UAC is taking quite some time to reply.
Therefore, there is timeout, and my UAS is re-sending
the 200 messages to SER (and SER just forward them on
to my UAC).
My question is, is this correct behaviour?
Or is SER supposed to ACK immediately a 200 message,
before forwarding it to my UAC?
Thanks for any pointers!
Chee
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
29 Jan
29 Jan
11:37 p.m.
New subject: Update: [Serusers] Is SER supposed to send ACK for 2xx response?
Hello.
Just an update on my previous post.
After reading section 16 in RFC3261, it looks like SER
is not supposed to send an ACK to a 2xx response (in
an INVITE dialog), since this ACK is supposed to be
generated by UAC core.
A proxy (like SER) would not implement UAC core
functionality, even if it is in stateful mode.
So, it means that SER is behaving 'correctly' as
described below.
If anyone has noted otherwise, please share with me.
Thanks!
C
--- C Y <bunnahnah2(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hello,
My setup is for an INVITE session is:
UAC ----> SER -----> UAS
I am using SER is a stateful forwarder (using
t_relay).
I find that when my UAS sends a "200 OK" to my UAC
(via SER), SER does not send an ACK to my UAS.
The 200 message is forwarded correctly to my UAC,
but
my UAC is taking quite some time to reply.
Therefore, there is timeout, and my UAS is
re-sending
the 200 messages to SER (and SER just forward them
on
to my UAC).
My question is, is this correct behaviour?
Or is SER supposed to ACK immediately a 200 message,
before forwarding it to my UAC?
Thanks for any pointers!
Chee
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
6877
days inactive
6881
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
C Y -
mkumar＠mantragroup.com -
Zoran Milic