> > Hi Bogdan, > I do see an ack sent back from the gw, however, when new > invite is sent openser relays it according to lcr rules but then a > 302 is sent back to the gateway. > > > Would it be better to detect and process the 302 message in openser > itself? > > Thanks. > > -- > > > > > On Mar 30, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > >> Hi Zahid, >> >> is the second 302 identical to the fist? is there any ACK from CISCO >> GW to openser as response to first 302? >> >> regards, >> bogdan >> >> zm23 wrote: >>> I made a mistake saying it was a REFER method. This is happening >>> with just a 302 reply messages. >>> Any suggestions? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >>> On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:17 PM, zm23 wrote: >>> >>>> Hello All, >>>> I am trying to find out the proper/best way to handle >>>> REFERs coming from phone. My setup is as follows: >>>> >>>> >>>> Cisco gw openser >>>> phone gw 2 >>>> >>>> >>>> DID >>>> 1234 -----> Invite -----------------> >>>> --------------------> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> <----- 302 msg <--------------------- >>>> <--------------------302 moved.... >>>> >>>> new #5678 sent back >>>> >>>> After receiving new invite, openser sends it out to another gateway >>>> >>>> 5678 ----> invite ----------------------> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------> >>>> >>>> yet i am still seeing the 302 messages sent back from proxy to >>>> cisco gw. >>>> >>>> <------------------------------- -- 302 moved >>>> >>>> >>>> Call does connect to 5678 but is dropped after few seconds with >>>> only one way audio. >>>> >>>> >>>> What needs to be done so that when second invite hits proxy, there >>>> are no more 302s sent back? >>>> >>>> Should I process the 302 in proxy itself? >>>> >>>> What is the best way to make the 2nd call to 5678 so that it can >>>> be identified as a separate call? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you in advance for your help in this regards. >>>> >>>> --Zahid