21 Oct
2008
21 Oct
'08
3:40 p.m.
Hi
I would like to have some rough estimate of the registrar performance (with
DB).
If there is no figure available, does it make sense to use call performance
benchmark like this one
http://www.transnexus.com/White%20Papers/OpenSER_RTPproxy_test.htm
and extrapolate to registrar performances ?
eg. can I say that the SIP REGISTRAR is able to handle >600 registrations
per second in the case of TransNexus testbed ?
Regards,
Pascal
21 Oct
21 Oct
8:51 p.m.
Pascal Maugeri wrote:
Hi
I would like to have some rough estimate of the registrar performance
(with DB).
registrar performance heavily depends on DB mode. Write through is
probably slower than write back mode.
If there is no figure available, does it make sense to
use call
performance benchmark like this one
http://www.transnexus.com/White%20Papers/OpenSER_RTPproxy_test.htm
and extrapolate to registrar performances ?
I do not think so.
regards
klaus
eg. can I say that the SIP REGISTRAR is able to handle
>600
registrations per second in the case of TransNexus testbed ?
Regards,
Pascal
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
22 Oct
22 Oct
11:08 a.m.
On Tuesday 21 October 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Some more factors this depends on:
- type of the database (mysql, postgres..)
- exact setup and machine configuration (DBs likes RAM)
- usage of a local DB or a remote one
- exact configuration of the UA and registrar, e.g. expires values, number of
DB access per REGISTER
In our experience registrar performance is not an issue. You'll probably need
several machines anyway because of HA/ maintenance requirements. But because
of this different factors its not easy to estimate for your special
situation.
You can find some registrar benchmarks at our website:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/openser-performance-tests/
I'd suggest that you do some benchmarks with your setup, e.g. with sipp and a
simple REGISTER scenario.
Cheers,
Henning
I would like
to have some rough estimate of the registrar performance
(with DB).
registrar performance heavily depends on DB mode. Write through is
probably slower than write back mode.
11:47 a.m.
Thanks for your input !
The link you provided is very useful for that purpose.
-pascal
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Henning Westerholt <
henning.westerholt(a)1und1.de> wrote:
On Tuesday 21 October 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Some more factors this depends on:
- type of the database (mysql, postgres..)
- exact setup and machine configuration (DBs likes RAM)
- usage of a local DB or a remote one
- exact configuration of the UA and registrar, e.g. expires values, number
of
DB access per REGISTER
In our experience registrar performance is not an issue. You'll probably
need
several machines anyway because of HA/ maintenance requirements. But
because
of this different factors its not easy to estimate for your special
situation.
You can find some registrar benchmarks at our website:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/openser-performance-tests/
I'd suggest that you do some benchmarks with your setup, e.g. with sipp and
a
simple REGISTER scenario.
Cheers,
Henning
I would
like to have some rough estimate of the registrar performance
(with DB).
registrar performance heavily depends on DB mode. Write through is
probably slower than write back mode.
5875
days inactive
5876
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Henning Westerholt -
Klaus Darilion -
Pascal Maugeri