13 Jul
2004
13 Jul
'04
9:17 p.m.
A possibility to keep status would be to use flags -- a poor variable
substitute till support for variables appears.
-jiri
At 10:14 PM 7/13/2004, Michael Przybylski wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've got a recursing failure_route block that I'm trying to use
for voice over IP gateway failover.
The recursion bit works without any problem, but I could really
use some hints on examining the branches appended by previous calls to the
failure route so that it can know when to stop.
Here's the pseudo-code version of what I'm trying to do.
if(examing previously appended branches shows
IP of last-chance gateway already there){
give up;
}
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Mike Przybylski
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
13 Jul
13 Jul
9:21 p.m.
New subject: [Serusers] serial forking with a recursive failure_route block
I was thinking along the lines of using the textops.so search() function.
Will that let me see what "Contact" headers have already been appended as
branches?
Best regards,
Mike Przybylski
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
A possibility to keep status would be to use flags --
a poor variable
substitute till support for variables appears.
-jiri
At 10:14 PM 7/13/2004, Michael Przybylski wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've got a recursing failure_route block that I'm trying to use
for voice over IP gateway failover.
The recursion bit works without any problem, but I could really
use some hints on examining the branches appended by previous calls to the
failure route so that it can know when to stop.
Here's the pseudo-code version of what I'm trying to do.
if(examing previously appended branches shows
IP of last-chance gateway already there){
give up;
}
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Mike Przybylski
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
14 Jul
14 Jul
2:58 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] serial forking with a recursive failure_route block
Jiri Kuthan wrote:
A possibility to keep status would be to use flags --
a poor variable
substitute till support for variables appears.
Any guesses on when that will happen? Thats the feature i am missing the
most with ser.
:: arnd ::
9:19 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] serial forking with a recursive failure_route block
On Jul 14, 2004 at 08:58, Arnd Vehling <av(a)nethead.de> wrote:
Jiri Kuthan wrote:
I'm the one responsible for this (or for not having this yet :-)).
We should have had it one year ago, but unfortunately more urgent stuff
keeps turning up and variables get delayed.
I really don't know when I will have time for it (currently new release
+timers+malloc improvements have a bigger priority).
Andrei
A possibility to keep status would be to use flags
-- a poor variable
substitute till support for variables appears.
Any guesses on when that will happen? Thats the feature i am missing the
most with ser.
7370
days inactive
7370
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul -
Arnd Vehling -
Jiri Kuthan -
Michael Przybylski