27 Nov
2006
27 Nov
'06
9:58 p.m.
Hello,
I see that UAC allows modifying the From header, but I would also like
to modify the To. This is because an ITSP I will be testing with wants
the From and To to be written in E.164 form (rewriting the R-URI appears
not to be good enough) while my internal registrations use a 5-digit
extension. It looks like uac is the right module for this but it
appears that it can only modify the From header with uac_replace_from()
and uac_restore_from(). Would this be the right place to add
uac_replace_to() and uac_resotre_to() as well?
/a
28 Nov
28 Nov
11:04 a.m.
Hi Alan,
my advice is to change the PSTN termination since their service is not
RFC compliant - TO header has no use in routing, only the RURI being
used (according to the RFC 3261 ~ 3 years old).
but to answer to your question, yes that is the proper place and the
mechanism is 95% the same as for FROM hdr.
regards,
bogdan
Alan Crosswell wrote:
Hello,
I see that UAC allows modifying the From header, but I would also like
to modify the To. This is because an ITSP I will be testing with wants
the From and To to be written in E.164 form (rewriting the R-URI appears
not to be good enough) while my internal registrations use a 5-digit
extension. It looks like uac is the right module for this but it
appears that it can only modify the From header with uac_replace_from()
and uac_restore_from(). Would this be the right place to add
uac_replace_to() and uac_resotre_to() as well?
/a
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
11:35 p.m.
Thanks Bogdan. I'll have to double-check with them; They may have only
meant they wanted the From in E.164 so that Caller ID works correctly.
/a
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Alan,
my advice is to change the PSTN termination since their service is not
RFC compliant - TO header has no use in routing, only the RURI being
used (according to the RFC 3261 ~ 3 years old).
but to answer to your question, yes that is the proper place and the
mechanism is 95% the same as for FROM hdr.
regards,
bogdan
Alan Crosswell wrote:
Hello,
I see that UAC allows modifying the From header, but I would also like
to modify the To. This is because an ITSP I will be testing with wants
the From and To to be written in E.164 form (rewriting the R-URI appears
not to be good enough) while my internal registrations use a 5-digit
extension. It looks like uac is the right module for this but it
appears that it can only modify the From header with uac_replace_from()
and uac_restore_from(). Would this be the right place to add
uac_replace_to() and uac_resotre_to() as well?
/a
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
29 Nov
29 Nov
10:38 p.m.
FWIW, i've been bemoaning the lack of 'To' rewriting for a while myself.
Level3, in its infinite wisdom, has decided that they need the RURI, From, and
'To' headers to be in a very specific format (prepended '+', 10 digits,
etc., etc.)
I can get the RURI and 'From' exactly the way they need it, but the 'To'
is definitely beyond my ability.
Do let me/us know if you intend to go ahead with 'uac_replace_to'. It would be
trememdously useful...
cheers
----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Crosswell <alan(a)columbia.edu>
To: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro>
Cc: users openser.org <users(a)openser.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 3:35:22 PM GMT-0600
Subject: Re: [Users] modifying From/To headers with uac module?
Thanks Bogdan. I'll have to double-check with them; They may have only
meant they wanted the From in E.164 so that Caller ID works correctly.
/a
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Alan,
my advice is to change the PSTN termination since their service is not
RFC compliant - TO header has no use in routing, only the RURI being
used (according to the RFC 3261 ~ 3 years old).
but to answer to your question, yes that is the proper place and the
mechanism is 95% the same as for FROM hdr.
regards,
bogdan
Alan Crosswell wrote:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
*******************************************
Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya (703) 386-1500 x9100
CTO mahesh(a)aptela.com
Aptela, Inc. http://www.aptela.com
"Aptela: How Business Answers The Call"
*******************************************
Hello,
I see that UAC allows modifying the From header, but I would also like
to modify the To. This is because an ITSP I will be testing with wants
the From and To to be written in E.164 form (rewriting the R-URI appears
not to be good enough) while my internal registrations use a 5-digit
extension. It looks like uac is the right module for this but it
appears that it can only modify the From header with uac_replace_from()
and uac_restore_from(). Would this be the right place to add
uac_replace_to() and uac_resotre_to() as well?
/a
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
30 Nov
30 Nov
12:25 a.m.
as a former level3 engineer who wrote some of level3s voip platform
parts and current customer i can tell you with certainty that level3
only enforces the e.164 requirement on the from and to header during
interop. if you can mock up your headers long enough to pass interop
and production turn up you can then safely terminate traffic to l3
without e.164 formatting. they will not refuse your calls once you
make it to production.
of course a better solution may be choosing a meta carrier like
bandwidth.com ( where i work )
hope this helps
tr
On 11/29/06 3:38 PM, "Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya" <mahesh(a)corp.aptela.com>
wrote:
FWIW, i've been bemoaning the lack of 'To'
rewriting for a while myself.
Level3, in its infinite wisdom, has decided that they need the RURI, From, and
'To' headers to be in a very specific format (prepended '+', 10 digits,
etc.,
etc.)
I can get the RURI and 'From' exactly the way they need it, but the 'To'
is
definitely beyond my ability.
Do let me/us know if you intend to go ahead with 'uac_replace_to'. It would
be trememdously useful...
cheers
----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Crosswell <alan(a)columbia.edu>
To: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro>
Cc: users openser.org <users(a)openser.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 3:35:22 PM GMT-0600
Subject: Re: [Users] modifying From/To headers with uac module?
Thanks Bogdan. I'll have to double-check with them; They may have only
meant they wanted the From in E.164 so that Caller ID works correctly.
/a
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Alan,
my advice is to change the PSTN termination since their service is not
RFC compliant - TO header has no use in routing, only the RURI being
used (according to the RFC 3261 ~ 3 years old).
but to answer to your question, yes that is the proper place and the
mechanism is 95% the same as for FROM hdr.
regards,
bogdan
Alan Crosswell wrote:
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello,
I see that UAC allows modifying the From header, but I would also like
to modify the To. This is because an ITSP I will be testing with wants
the From and To to be written in E.164 form (rewriting the R-URI appears
not to be good enough) while my internal registrations use a 5-digit
extension. It looks like uac is the right module for this but it
appears that it can only modify the From header with uac_replace_from()
and uac_restore_from(). Would this be the right place to add
uac_replace_to() and uac_resotre_to() as well?
/a
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
6568
days inactive
6570
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alan Crosswell -
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu -
Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya -
T.R. Missner