CPU E5504 Xeon 4MB cache 2GHz
800 concurrent calls with 92% CPU usage
So 400-450 calls for 1GHz (with 99% CPU usage, in fact I cannot get it
to 100% dunno why)
They had 325 calls per 1GHz, so yes, there must be some improvement ;)
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Alex Balashov
<abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> wrote:
I'd be curious to know if your performance might
actually be higher, owing
to improved CPUs since the study was done, hyperthreading, more frames per
NIC interrupt, etc.
-- Alex
--
Sent from my Samsung mobile, and thus lacking in the refinement one might
expect from a proper keyboard.
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web:
http://www.evaristesys.com/
Mino Haluz <mino.haluz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you, setting ulimits worked! And the performance is the same as
stated in the document I mentioned! :)
One more thing, I found these errors in syslog:
Sep 13 18:38:18 perftest kamailio[5268]: ERROR: <core>
[parser/sdp/sdp.c:211]: Invalid payload location
Sep 13 18:38:18 perftest kamailio[5268]: ERROR: <core>
[parser/sdp/sdp.c:227]: Invalid payload location
Sep 13 18:38:18 perftest kamailio[5270]: ERROR: <core>
[parser/sdp/sdp.c:227]: Invalid payload location
This is possibly something related to my sipp scenario, this is the
INVITE sent from sipp
<![CDATA[
INVITE sip:800@perftest.vm SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/[transport] 10.0.2.36:[local_port];branch=[branch]
From: "700" <sip:500@10.0.2.36>;tag=[call_number]
To: <sip:800@perftest.vm>
Call-ID: [call_id]
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Contact: "700" <sip:700@10.0.2.36:[local_port]>
Max-Forwards: 70
Subject: Performance Test
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: [len]
v=0
o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP[local_ip_type] 10.0.2.36
s=-
c=IN IP[local_ip_type] 10.0.2.36
t=0 0
m=audio [auto_media_port] RTP/AVP 8
a=rtpmap:8 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-11,16
]]>
Do you see something that could cause this error ? Otherwise the call
is initiated ok, but I really dont understand what is so strange to
kamailio in this INVITE.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2012/9/13 Mino Haluz
<mino.haluz(a)gmail.com>om>:
You mean on the proxy side? I'm running
rtpproxy as root, limits are
still applied ? ulimit -s unlimited should do the trick ?
Yes, they usually applied even for superuser, and yes - this should
help (if that's the issue).
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users