18 Oct
2007
18 Oct
'07
11:03 p.m.
At 18:28 18/10/2007, Stefan.Brozinski(a)materna.de wrote:
Jiri,
does that mean that there are no plans to support RFC 3841?
First: what do you mean by "supporting RFC 3841" ... can't you script it?
Secondly: whether as scripting or not, my individual plans are not as important
as whether there is some individual on this mailing list willing to do it,
there is really not a grand plan.... I think the most reasonable next step
would be for someone desiring to have it to script it and share it.
This is sad because 3GPP's CSCFs require these
headers, and the
OpenIMSCore project uses SER to implement its CSCFs.
Well, I am unfortunately not involved in OpenIMSCore.
-jiri
Regards
Stefan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:03 PM
> To: Brozinski, Stefan; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] RFC 3841 support?
>
>
> There is no explicit support for callerprefs. I think though
> that most of the scenarios
> they are goof for could be achieved using textops and
> selects+AVP processing.
>
> -jiri
>
> At 15:40 18/10/2007, Stefan.Brozinski(a)materna.de wrote:
> >Hello everybody
> >
> >are there any plans to support RFC 3841 in SER?
> >
> >Specifically, I am looking at the 'Accept-Contact' and the
> >'Request-Disposition' header fields.
> >
> >Thanks
> >Stefan
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
> --
> Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>
>
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
19 Oct
19 Oct
7:36 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] RFC 3841 support?
Stefan,
As of SER 2.0, the scripting capabilities are good enough to implement
nearly everything without writing a module. With a number of RFCs with
limited scope (in terms of "used by x% of installations"), creating a
route block for the functionality may be more efficient than writing a
new module. This route block can then easily be added to the config
buildsystem and allow inclusion of the support as simple as loading a
module.
So, both contributions in the shape of script snippets and new modules
are welcome.
g-)
Jiri Kuthan wrote:
At 18:28 18/10/2007, Stefan.Brozinski(a)materna.de
wrote:
Jiri,
does that mean that there are no plans to support RFC 3841?
First: what do you mean by "supporting RFC 3841" ... can't you script it?
Secondly: whether as scripting or not, my individual plans are not as important
as whether there is some individual on this mailing list willing to do it,
there is really not a grand plan.... I think the most reasonable next step
would be for someone desiring to have it to script it and share it.
This is sad because 3GPP's CSCFs require
these headers, and the
OpenIMSCore project uses SER to implement its CSCFs.
Well, I am unfortunately not involved in OpenIMSCore.
-jiri
Regards
Stefan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:03 PM
> To: Brozinski, Stefan; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] RFC 3841 support?
>
>
> There is no explicit support for callerprefs. I think though
> that most of the scenarios
> they are goof for could be achieved using textops and
> selects+AVP processing.
>
> -jiri
>
> At 15:40 18/10/2007, Stefan.Brozinski(a)materna.de wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody
>>
>> are there any plans to support RFC 3841 in SER?
>>
>> Specifically, I am looking at the 'Accept-Contact' and the
>> 'Request-Disposition' header fields.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Stefan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>
> --
> Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>
>
>
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
10:51 a.m.
New subject: [Serusers] RFC 3841 support?
can't you script it?
As I am not an SER expert, I really can't answer this question.
I just asked the RFC3841 support question after looking at a network
trace and finding out that the proxy server behaved different from what
I expected.
As far as I understand the suggestions that had been made in the last
posts, there are (at least) two possibilities to support new headers:
1. writing a module (shared lib).
2. writing a script.
Thanks to everybody who helped
Stefan
-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 11:04 PM
To: Brozinski, Stefan; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] RFC 3841 support?
At 18:28 18/10/2007, Stefan.Brozinski(a)materna.de wrote:
Jiri,
does that mean that there are no plans to support RFC 3841?
First: what do you mean by "supporting RFC 3841" ... can't
you script it?
Secondly: whether as scripting or not, my individual plans
are not as important
as whether there is some individual on this mailing list
willing to do it,
there is really not a grand plan.... I think the most
reasonable next step
would be for someone desiring to have it to script it and share it.
This is sad because 3GPP's CSCFs require these
headers, and the
OpenIMSCore project uses SER to implement its CSCFs.
Well, I am unfortunately not involved in OpenIMSCore.
-jiri
Regards
Stefan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:03 PM
> To: Brozinski, Stefan; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] RFC 3841 support?
>
>
> There is no explicit support for callerprefs. I think though
> that most of the scenarios
> they are goof for could be achieved using textops and
> selects+AVP processing.
>
> -jiri
>
> At 15:40 18/10/2007, Stefan.Brozinski(a)materna.de wrote:
> >Hello everybody
> >
> >are there any plans to support RFC 3841 in SER?
> >
> >Specifically, I am looking at the 'Accept-Contact' and the
> >'Request-Disposition' header fields.
> >
> >Thanks
> >Stefan
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
> --
> Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>
>
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
6253
days inactive
6254
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Greger V. Teigre -
Jiri Kuthan -
Stefan.Brozinski＠materna.de