Hi Daniel,

Thanks for replying me. Do you know when is this issue going to be fixed?

Thanks,

-----Original Message----- From: daniel@voice-system.ro Sent: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:59:16 +0300 To: innocent.evil@inbox.com Subject: Re: [Serusers] UAC module status of CVS HEAD version

Hello,

On 07/29/05 05:30, Innocent Evil wrote:

...

Hello,

Anybody know about the status of UAC module of CVS HEAD version. Does it work?

the open issue is the CSeq incrementation upon an authentication challenge -- if your server check the cseq number, then authentication will not work. Annonymization works ok.

Daniel

...

Thanks, _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

Hi,

Do you have an example about this stateful solution, Klaus ?

Klaus Darilion wrote:

Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

...

Hello,

On 07/29/05 05:30, Innocent Evil wrote:

...

Hello,

Anybody know about the status of UAC module of CVS HEAD version. Does it work?

the open issue is the CSeq incrementation upon an authentication challenge -- if your server check the cseq number, then authentication will not work. Annonymization works ok.

A verrrrrry verrrry dirty hack which works only for the first authentication: Decrement the CSeq in the first request.

Obiously, a stateful solution which keeps track of the differing CSeq in the 2 call legs would be a better solution.

klaus

---

Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers