29 Jul
2005
29 Jul
'05
5:30 a.m.
Hello,
Anybody know about the status of UAC module of CVS HEAD version.
Does it work?
Thanks,
29 Jul
29 Jul
11:59 a.m.
Hello,
On 07/29/05 05:30, Innocent Evil wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know about the status of UAC module of CVS HEAD version.
Does it work?
the open issue is the CSeq incrementation upon an authentication
challenge -- if your server check the cseq number, then authentication
will not work. Annonymization works ok.
Daniel
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
5:07 p.m.
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for replying me.
Do you know when is this issue going to be fixed?
Thanks,
-----Original Message-----
From: daniel(a)voice-system.ro
Sent: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:59:16 +0300
To: innocent.evil(a)inbox.com
Subject: Re: [Serusers] UAC module status of CVS HEAD version
Hello,
On 07/29/05 05:30, Innocent Evil wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know about the status of UAC module of CVS HEAD version.
Does it work?
the open issue is the CSeq incrementation upon an authentication
challenge -- if your server check the cseq number, then authentication
will not work. Annonymization works ok.
Daniel
>Thanks,
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>Serusers(a)iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
> 
1 Aug
1 Aug
10:37 a.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 07/29/05 05:30, Innocent Evil wrote:
A verrrrrry verrrry dirty hack which works
only for the first
authentication:
Decrement the CSeq in the first request.
Obiously, a stateful solution which keeps track of the differing CSeq in
the 2 call legs would be a better solution.
klaus
Hello,
Anybody know about the status of UAC module of CVS HEAD version.
Does it work?
the open issue is the CSeq incrementation upon an authentication
challenge -- if your server check the cseq number, then authentication
will not work. Annonymization works ok. 
9:35 p.m.
Hi,
Do you have an example about this stateful solution, Klaus ?
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
--
Thomas Storino Britis
TCNet Inf e Telecom LTDA
Hello,
On 07/29/05 05:30, Innocent Evil wrote:
A verrrrrry verrrry dirty hack which works only for the first
authentication:
Decrement the CSeq in the first request.
Obiously, a stateful solution which keeps track of the differing CSeq in
the 2 call legs would be a better solution.
klaus
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hello,
Anybody know about the status of UAC module of CVS HEAD version.
Does it work?
the open issue is the CSeq incrementation upon an authentication
challenge -- if your server check the cseq number, then authentication
will not work. Annonymization works ok.
7053
days inactive
7056
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Innocent Evil -
Klaus Darilion -
Thomas Britis