13 Jun
2006
13 Jun
'06
5:06 p.m.
Hi,
just want to tell you that if you want so see what performance you'll
get out of your OpenSER proxy, I found out by using a software called
super-smack I easily can generate a typical OpenSER sql query and see
how many qps I can get.
...nice to have :-)
br hw
--
Helge Waastad
Senior Konsulent
Smartnet
13 Jun
13 Jun
6:10 p.m.
Hi Helge,
so this "super-smack" is more a tester for DB?
regards,
bogdan
Helge Waastad wrote:
Hi,
just want to tell you that if you want so see what performance you'll
get out of your OpenSER proxy, I found out by using a software called
super-smack I easily can generate a typical OpenSER sql query and see
how many qps I can get.
...nice to have :-)
br hw
11:23 p.m.
Hi,
yes that's correct.
you'll be able to test different scenarios; in simplest way select statements.
(ex: query from 10 clients, 1000 per client)
If you combine different table lookups, you'll see the performance numbers for queries
per second.(In addition to several others max/min connect time etc)
For my own project I've done testing on several OS'es and platforms to decide
which has the best performance.
I mean, seeing number for cps for a SIP proxy just routing packets makes no sense to me,
since most installations do several db queries (ACL etc etc)
For instance cacheless usrloc performance......
...and fun to see performance improvement by loading avps from database.....
I always like to have a few achademic numbers in my documentation :-)
Mvh/br,
Helge Waastad
Senior Engineer
Smartnet
-----Original Message-----
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro]
Sent: Tue 6/13/2006 6:10 PM
To: Helge Waastad
Cc: Users(a)openser.org
Subject: Re: [Users] OpenSER performance
Hi Helge,
so this "super-smack" is more a tester for DB?
regards,
bogdan
Helge Waastad wrote:
Hi,
just want to tell you that if you want so see what performance you'll
get out of your OpenSER proxy, I found out by using a software called
super-smack I easily can generate a typical OpenSER sql query and see
how many qps I can get.
...nice to have :-)
br hw
14 Jun
14 Jun
1:08 a.m.
Hi Helge,
Helge Waastad wrote:
If you combine different table lookups, you'll see
the performance numbers for queries per second.(In addition to several others max/min
connect time etc)
For my own project I've done testing on several OS'es and platforms to decide
which has the best performance.
Actually, this sounds very interesting for anybody on this mailing list.
Could the results be published [on the list]? An academic wrapper might
not be necessary, some raw data would probably be just fine. :)
I mean, seeing number for cps for a SIP proxy just
routing packets makes no sense to me, since most installations do several db queries (ACL
etc etc)
For instance cacheless usrloc performance......
...and fun to see performance improvement by loading avps from database.....
You are touching a soft spot here. I've always appreciated the storage
backend is slower (and slowing the whole thing down) by at least one
magnitude order, in most of reasonable featured OpenSER deployments.
Is there any data you could provide us with, on the topic?
Regards,
Gill.
6729
days inactive
6729
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu -
Gill Bates -
Helge Waastad -
Helge Waastad