19 Jun
2006
19 Jun
'06
10:46 a.m.
Hi all,
i need to implement openser for nat traversal. can anyone tell me if using nat
helper module would be better or using media proxy. from so far i read, i understood that
mediaproxy needs separate installation but does not need to make much change in the
existing openser.cfg. where as if i use the nathelper, there is no need for separate media
proxy installation but the openser cfg needs to be changed. Please suggest the best way to
do it....? also please correct me if what i understood is not right......
Thanks so much,
Padmaja
19 Jun
19 Jun
12:15 p.m.
Hello,
for nathelper you need a separate media relay which is named rtpproxy.
So in both cases you need a second application which can run on same or
separate machine as openser.
Choosing between nathelper and mediaproxy is a matter of taste, more or
less. nathelper/rtpproxy are pure C code and they have slightly more
features as mediaproxy module/mediaproxy relay (e.g., nathelper features
OPTIONS natpings and more options to mangle SDP). As opposite,
mediaproxy seems to be easier to use, but mediaproxy relay is Python and
some do not feel comfortable with.
The best way is to try both and chose the one which fits better.
Searching on the archive you will find some other opinions, too.
Best regards,
Daniel
On 06/19/06 10:46, Padmaja RV wrote:
Hi all,
i need to implement openser for nat traversal. can anyone
tell me if using nat helper module would be better or using media
proxy. from so far i read, i understood that mediaproxy needs
separate installation but does not need to make much change in the
existing openser.cfg. where as if i use the nathelper, there is no
need for separate media proxy installation but the openser cfg needs
to be changed. Please suggest the best way to do it....? also please
correct me if what i understood is not right......
Thanks so much,
Padmaja
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
4:52 p.m.
Hi,
Thanks a lot for the reply... will try to implement the RTP proxy. can
you tell me what is the latest RTP Proxy code needed for the openser-1.0.1
and where I can get it from?
Once again Thank You,
Regards,
Padmaja
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <daniel(a)voice-system.ro>
To: "Padmaja RV" <padmaja.rv(a)vodcalabs.com>
Cc: <users(a)openser.org>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] nat traversal
Hello,
for nathelper you need a separate media relay which is named rtpproxy. So
in both cases you need a second application which can run on same or
separate machine as openser.
Choosing between nathelper and mediaproxy is a matter of taste, more or
less. nathelper/rtpproxy are pure C code and they have slightly more
features as mediaproxy module/mediaproxy relay (e.g., nathelper features
OPTIONS natpings and more options to mangle SDP). As opposite, mediaproxy
seems to be easier to use, but mediaproxy relay is Python and some do not
feel comfortable with.
The best way is to try both and chose the one which fits better. Searching
on the archive you will find some other opinions, too.
Best regards,
Daniel
On 06/19/06 10:46, Padmaja RV wrote:
Hi all,
i need to implement openser for nat traversal. can anyone tell me if
using nat helper module would be better or using media proxy. from so far
i read, i understood that mediaproxy needs separate installation but does
not need to make much change in the existing openser.cfg. where as if i
use the nathelper, there is no need for separate media proxy installation
but the openser cfg needs to be changed. Please suggest the best way to
do it....? also please correct me if what i understood is not right......
Thanks so much,
Padmaja
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
7:43 p.m.
Hello,
On 06/19/06 16:52, Padmaja RV wrote:
Hi,
Thanks a lot for the reply... will try to implement the RTP proxy.
can you tell me what is the latest RTP Proxy code needed for the
openser-1.0.1 and where I can get it from?
snapshots of the cvs are here:
http://www.openser.org/downloads/snapshots/rtpproxy/
If you want to take if from cvs:
cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@cvs.ser.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser login
(enter for password)
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous@cvs.ser.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser rtpproxy
On some distributions, you can find it as package, check the repository.
Cheers,
Daniel
Once again Thank You,
Regards,
Padmaja
----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla"
<daniel(a)voice-system.ro>
To: "Padmaja RV" <padmaja.rv(a)vodcalabs.com>
Cc: <users(a)openser.org>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] nat traversal
Hello,
for nathelper you need a separate media relay which is named
rtpproxy. So in both cases you need a second application which can
run on same or separate machine as openser.
Choosing between nathelper and mediaproxy is a matter of taste, more
or less. nathelper/rtpproxy are pure C code and they have slightly
more features as mediaproxy module/mediaproxy relay (e.g., nathelper
features OPTIONS natpings and more options to mangle SDP). As
opposite, mediaproxy seems to be easier to use, but mediaproxy relay
is Python and some do not feel comfortable with.
The best way is to try both and chose the one which fits better.
Searching on the archive you will find some other opinions, too.
Best regards,
Daniel
On 06/19/06 10:46, Padmaja RV wrote:
Hi all,
i need to implement openser for nat traversal. can anyone tell me
if using nat helper module would be better or using media proxy.
from so far i read, i understood that mediaproxy needs separate
installation but does not need to make much change in the existing
openser.cfg. where as if i use the nathelper, there is no need for
separate media proxy installation but the openser cfg needs to be
changed. Please suggest the best way to do it....? also please
correct me if what i understood is not right......
Thanks so much,
Padmaja
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
6734
days inactive
6734
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Padmaja RV