Yeah, recompiled, etc., etc. I was actually hoping for somebody to say "Oh Yeah, if you are using tm, be sure to .... if you have -DF_MALLOC" Unfortunately, the problem only occurs at *high* loads, and I cant replicate this on a test system. Soooo, for now, I'm probably just going to leave -DBG_QM_MALLOC in place, and hope that the "a miracle occurs" approach to solving problems pans out :-) Thanx anyway.... Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi Kanakatti, > > please first be sure you recompiled all the used modules and the core > with same configuration. Updating from CVS will be also a way to go. > If the problem still persist, try to provide more info - switch to > strerr and increase the logging level (openser logs are good info > source); also, if the case, the core file will be good. > More info about "crash" is good to trace it down. > > regards, > Bogdan > > Kanakatti M. Subramanya wrote: > >> I'm running 0.9.5, on my system, and *have* to comment out >> -DF_MALLOC (and uncomment -DDBG_QM_MALLOC) to have the system be >> stable. It pretty much always crashes when trying to do >> save("location") >> >> Anyone else seen this? >> >> List of modules is >> >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/mysql.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/sl.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/tm.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/rr.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/maxfwd.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/usrloc.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/registrar.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/auth.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/auth_db.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/acc.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/exec.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/group.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/nathelper.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/mediaproxy.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/textops.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/uri_db.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/uri.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/domain.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/xlog.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/options.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/avpops.so" >> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/lcr.so" >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users(a)openser.org >> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >>

Briefly (oh so briefly) put the version with -DF_MALLOC online, and, as expected, had a couple of crashes. There was really not much information in the debug logs. The core dumps said the following Dump 1 #0 0xb7f083f0 in strnlen () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0xb7eda8e2 in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0xb7f67fa1 in vsyslog () from /lib/libc.so.6 #3 0xb7f67e0f in syslog () from /lib/libc.so.6 #4 0xb7d5da49 in wt_timer (_r=0xafe4edd0) at urecord.c:267 #5 0xb7d57548 in timer_udomain (_d=0xafe407e8) at udomain.c:424 #6 0xb7d52f52 in synchronize_all_udomains () at dlist.c:325 #7 0xb7d5ac39 in destroy () at ul_mod.c:245 #8 0x0807286e in destroy_modules () at sr_module.c:355 #9 0x0805a6dd in cleanup (show_status=1) at main.c:351 #10 0x0805b125 in handle_sigs () at main.c:510 #11 0x0805ba6a in main_loop () at main.c:1163 #12 0x0805c916 in main (argc=8, argv=0x0) at main.c:1564 Dump 2 #0 0xb7d5d8d8 in wt_timer (_r=0xb03c3168) at urecord.c:247 247 if (!VALID_CONTACT(ptr, act_time)) { (gdb) bt #0 0xb7d5d8d8 in wt_timer (_r=0xb03c3168) at urecord.c:247 #1 0xb7d57548 in timer_udomain (_d=0xafe63518) at udomain.c:424 #2 0xb7d52f52 in synchronize_all_udomains () at dlist.c:325 #3 0xb7d5ac39 in destroy () at ul_mod.c:245 #4 0x0807286e in destroy_modules () at sr_module.c:355 #5 0x0805a6dd in cleanup (show_status=1) at main.c:351 #6 0x0805b125 in handle_sigs () at main.c:510 #7 0x0805ba6a in main_loop () at main.c:1163 #8 0x0805c916 in main (argc=8, argv=0x0) at main.c:1564 (gdb) print ptr $1 = (ucontact_t *) 0xc (gdb) print act_time $2 = 1123163783 Anything obvious leaps out at you??? Cheers, and thanx... Kanakatti Mahesh Subramanya wrote: