Hi everybody,
Thanks to a contribution from Jeremie, nathelper module offers the possibility to configure the "a=nortpproxy:yes\r\n" string. This is a string marker added by nathelper when rtpproxy is enabled.
The new "nortpproxy_str" parameter: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/nathelper.html#AEN217
allows you to both change or disable this string marker.
For more see: http://openser.org/pipermail/users/2006-September/006519.html
regards, Bogdan
Hi!
does this only change the inserted string or does it also change the string which will be searched for by nathelper module to prevent proxy-chains?
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi everybody,
Thanks to a contribution from Jeremie, nathelper module offers the possibility to configure the "a=nortpproxy:yes\r\n" string. This is a string marker added by nathelper when rtpproxy is enabled.
The new "nortpproxy_str" parameter: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/nathelper.html#AEN217
allows you to both change or disable this string marker.
For more see: http://openser.org/pipermail/users/2006-September/006519.html
regards, Bogdan
Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Klaus,
It will change both - what is added and what is looking after.
regards, bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
does this only change the inserted string or does it also change the string which will be searched for by nathelper module to prevent proxy-chains?
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi everybody,
Thanks to a contribution from Jeremie, nathelper module offers the possibility to configure the "a=nortpproxy:yes\r\n" string. This is a string marker added by nathelper when rtpproxy is enabled.
The new "nortpproxy_str" parameter: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/nathelper.html#AEN217
allows you to both change or disable this string marker.
For more see: http://openser.org/pipermail/users/2006-September/006519.html
regards, Bogdan
Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi
I think the "a=nortpproxy:yes" attribute should be standardised somehow.
Otherwise you will end up with massive interop problems between various OpenSER/SER installations all using their own locally configured attribute.
/alfred
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Klaus,
It will change both - what is added and what is looking after.
regards, bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
does this only change the inserted string or does it also change the string which will be searched for by nathelper module to prevent proxy-chains?
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi everybody,
Thanks to a contribution from Jeremie, nathelper module offers the possibility to configure the "a=nortpproxy:yes\r\n" string. This is a string marker added by nathelper when rtpproxy is enabled.
The new "nortpproxy_str" parameter: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/nathelper.html#AEN217
allows you to both change or disable this string marker.
For more see: http://openser.org/pipermail/users/2006-September/006519.html
regards, Bogdan
Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Alfred,
You are right that some rules should be followed to get interoperability.
That's why the default value is one that basically guarantee that. Only if you really know what you are doing, you should start changing this parameter.
I see a need to be able to control this param, mainly because in some cases I really want to force rtpproxy on my platform, even if already dome by other servers...and this because I really want to controll the traffic. I having an automatic system to disable the proxy based on some hdr is not something I want to have.
shortly, if people use the default cfg, nothing changes. For other people, looking from more complex scenario, this param is what they need.
regards, bogdan
Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
Hi
I think the "a=nortpproxy:yes" attribute should be standardised somehow.
Otherwise you will end up with massive interop problems between various OpenSER/SER installations all using their own locally configured attribute.
/alfred
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Klaus,
It will change both - what is added and what is looking after.
regards, bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
does this only change the inserted string or does it also change the string which will be searched for by nathelper module to prevent proxy-chains?
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi everybody,
Thanks to a contribution from Jeremie, nathelper module offers the possibility to configure the "a=nortpproxy:yes\r\n" string. This is a string marker added by nathelper when rtpproxy is enabled.
The new "nortpproxy_str" parameter: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/nathelper.html#AEN217
allows you to both change or disable this string marker.
For more see: http://openser.org/pipermail/users/2006-September/006519.html
regards, Bogdan
Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Alfred,
You are right that some rules should be followed to get interoperability.
That's why the default value is one that basically guarantee that. Only if you really know what you are doing, you should start changing this parameter.
I see a need to be able to control this param, mainly because in some cases I really want to force rtpproxy on my platform, even if already dome by other servers...and this because I really want to controll the traffic. I having an automatic system to disable the proxy based on some hdr is not something I want to have.
Then it would be better to force this explicit when calling force_rtpproxy() - because others could fake that special SDP line.
regards klaus
shortly, if people use the default cfg, nothing changes. For other people, looking from more complex scenario, this param is what they need.
regards, bogdan
Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
Hi
I think the "a=nortpproxy:yes" attribute should be standardised somehow.
Otherwise you will end up with massive interop problems between various OpenSER/SER installations all using their own locally configured attribute.
/alfred
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Klaus,
It will change both - what is added and what is looking after.
regards, bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
does this only change the inserted string or does it also change the string which will be searched for by nathelper module to prevent proxy-chains?
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi everybody,
Thanks to a contribution from Jeremie, nathelper module offers the possibility to configure the "a=nortpproxy:yes\r\n" string. This is a string marker added by nathelper when rtpproxy is enabled.
The new "nortpproxy_str" parameter: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/nathelper.html#AEN217
allows you to both change or disable this string marker.
For more see: http://openser.org/pipermail/users/2006-September/006519.html
regards, Bogdan
Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
Alfred E. Heggestad writes:
I think the "a=nortpproxy:yes" attribute should be standardised somehow.
Otherwise you will end up with massive interop problems between various OpenSER/SER installations all using their own locally configured attribute.
how about a policy that a proxy only does rtp proxying on behalf of its own users and assumes that other proxies handle their own users?
-- juha
On Thu, January 18, 2007 20:55, Juha Heinanen said:
Alfred E. Heggestad writes:
I think the "a=nortpproxy:yes" attribute should be standardised
somehow.
Otherwise you will end up with massive interop problems between various OpenSER/SER installations all using their own locally configured attribute.
how about a policy that a proxy only does rtp proxying on behalf of its own users and assumes that other proxies handle their own users?
This is how it should be done - but some providers want to relay all audio regardless of NAT traversal (or must relay for legal matters).
Thus it makes sense to tell nathelper/rtpproxy to not search for the special SDP header.
regards klaus
-- juha
Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel