Hello,
Running into odd behaviour in Kamailio 5.0.2 and I'm hoping to clarify. I have a simple route that uses the textops functions subst and remove_hf. Other than that, there is nothing else done within the route. In some cases, the remove_hf function returns false as there are no matching headers.
Documentation in https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.0.x/core#return seems to show that if there are no explicit return statements, the route should return 1. However, this route appears to be returning -1.
My question is: if a function within a route returns a negative value, and there are no explicit return statements, will the entire route return -1 (as it appears is happening), or should the route return 1 as the core cookbook indicates?
Thanks in advance,
Jeff
Hi,
My understanding is that return value of last statement becomes the return value of named route if none explicitly specified. Therefore i always explicitly return 1 or exit.
— Muhammad. On Tue 20. Feb 2018 at 22:48, Jeff Bilyk jbilyk@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Running into odd behaviour in Kamailio 5.0.2 and I'm hoping to clarify. I have a simple route that uses the textops functions subst and remove_hf. Other than that, there is nothing else done within the route. In some cases, the remove_hf function returns false as there are no matching headers.
Documentation in https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.0.x/core#return seems to show that if there are no explicit return statements, the route should return 1. However, this route appears to be returning -1.
My question is: if a function within a route returns a negative value, and there are no explicit return statements, will the entire route return -1 (as it appears is happening), or should the route return 1 as the core cookbook indicates?
Thanks in advance,
Jeff _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Thanks Muhammad, appreciate that clarification.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:10 PM, M S shaheryarkh@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
My understanding is that return value of last statement becomes the return value of named route if none explicitly specified. Therefore i always explicitly return 1 or exit.
— Muhammad. On Tue 20. Feb 2018 at 22:48, Jeff Bilyk jbilyk@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Running into odd behaviour in Kamailio 5.0.2 and I'm hoping to clarify. I have a simple route that uses the textops functions subst and remove_hf. Other than that, there is nothing else done within the route. In some cases, the remove_hf function returns false as there are no matching headers.
Documentation in https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.0.x/core# return seems to show that if there are no explicit return statements, the route should return 1. However, this route appears to be returning -1.
My question is: if a function within a route returns a negative value, and there are no explicit return statements, will the entire route return -1 (as it appears is happening), or should the route return 1 as the core cookbook indicates?
Thanks in advance,
Jeff _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-
Jeff Bilyk -
M S