On Jueves 02 Septiembre 2010 13:50:24 Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana escribió:

On Jueves 02 Septiembre 2010 08:59:17 marius zbihlei escribió:

...

Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:

...

Hi ... jus trying Kam 3.0.3 ... I get blocked on this error:

ERROR: <core> [db.c:408]: invalid version 0 for table 0 found, expected 6 (check table structure and table "version") ERROR: auth_db [authdb_mod.c:250]: error during table version check.

It should be checking agains subscriber table version ... but I don't know why it try to found '0' table ...

if I do a:

insert into version (table_name,table_version) values('0','6');

It get solved ... but thats only a trick.

Hello,

The check is done once (at fixup time) for the www_authorize and proxy_authorize calls. The table name is the second parameter given to those calls.

Be sure to use www_authorize("explample.com", "subscriber");

I know ...

if(is_method("REGISTER")) { # authenticate the REGISTER requests if(!www_authorize("","subscriber")) { xlog("L_ALERT", "REGISTER ($fU)($ru) no autorizado - Return Code ($rc) IP=$si\n"); www_challenge("","0"); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Upsssssssssss ... XPPPPPPPPPPPP

Thanks

This was ok ... but I don't know why it try to check version of table '0' ... :-(

Best regards

On Jueves 02 Septiembre 2010 14:30:03 marius zbihlei escribió:

Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:

...

On Jueves 02 Septiembre 2010 13:50:24 Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana

escribió:

...

...

On Jueves 02 Septiembre 2010 08:59:17 marius zbihlei escribió:

...

Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:

...

Hi ... jus trying Kam 3.0.3 ... I get blocked on this error:

ERROR: <core> [db.c:408]: invalid version 0 for table 0 found, expected 6 (check table structure and table "version") ERROR: auth_db [authdb_mod.c:250]: error during table version check.

It should be checking agains subscriber table version ... but I don't know why it try to found '0' table ...

if I do a:

insert into version (table_name,table_version) values('0','6');

It get solved ... but thats only a trick.

Hello,

The check is done once (at fixup time) for the www_authorize and proxy_authorize calls. The table name is the second parameter given to those calls.

Be sure to use www_authorize("explample.com", "subscriber");

I know ...

if(is_method("REGISTER")) {

  # authenticate the REGISTER requests
  if(!www_authorize("","subscriber")) {

     xlog("L_ALERT", "REGISTER ($fU)($ru) no autorizado - Return
     Code

($rc) IP=$si\n");

     www_challenge("","0");

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Upsssssssssss ... XPPPPPPPPPPPP

Thanks

This was ok ... but I don't know why it try to check version of table '0' ...

:-(

Best regards

Hello, Please grep for any usage of www_authorize and proxy_authorize in the kamailio.cfg configuration file. You still might have something lurking there.. Marius

Ummm ... it was a proxy_autorize call later on the .cfg .... just a misstyped if statement ..

Thanks