Yes, i meant the FROM and TO.
I think in version 3.2.0 the headers had theses < >....
So, even if the user agents (vendors stacks) are at fault.... how can i
deal with it?
any ideas?
You probably meant the To and From headers, I'm
guessing.
Yeah, as long as there is no display name component, URIs in headers like
that
don't have to go in <>s. The way >Kamailio sends it is grammatically
valid, per RFC 3261. The user agents are at fault for not understanding it
correctly.
wrote:
wrote: *>* *>>*Hi, *>>* *>>*I think there is a bug with the BYE
that is
sent to the caller and *>>*callee *>>*when dialog timeout happends. *>>*
*>>
*The BYE headers are sent with no "<" or ">". *>>*So, some
sip singaling
points decline the BYE. *>>* *>>*BR, *>>*Uri *
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Uri Shacked <ushacked(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I think there is a bug with the BYE that is sent to the caller and callee
when dialog timeout happends.
The BYE headers are sent with no "<" or ">".
So, some sip singaling points decline the BYE.
BR,
Uri