Hello,
Find message below...
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
[mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Lucas Aimaretto
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 4:29 PM
To: o-zone(a)zerozone.it; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] Radius Acc
> Hi there. I've a question for you. Are
you getting correctly the
> Acct-Stop records ? .... if so, how did you configure
your ser.cfg,
because
I'm only getting Acct-Start records, for both
INVITE and BYE
messages.
I've solved using setflag(1) after route {, in this way:
[....CUT....]
# -- rr params --
# add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy
modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) modparam("acc",
"radius_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "radius_missed_flag", 3)
# ------------------------- request routing logic
-------------------
# main routing logic
route{
setflag(1);
if (method=="REGISTER")
log(1, "REGISTER message received\n");
if (method=="INVITE")
log(1, "INVITE message received\n");
if (method=="ACK")
log(1, "ACK message received\n");
if (method=="BYE")
log(1, "BYE message received\n");
[...CUT...]
Thanx for answering ... but your configuration did not help me at all.
Look at my ser.cfg ...
# -- RADIUS ACC --
modparam("acc", "radius_config", "/etc/radiusclient.conf")
modparam("acc", "radius_flag", 1)
modparam("acc", "radius_missed_flag", 3)
modparam("acc", "log_level", 2)
route{
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10"))
{
sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
break;
};
if ( msg:len > max_len )
{
sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
break;
};
You need to also catch messages that are being loose routed, which is often
the case for BYE messages.
Setflat(1);
here.
record_route();
if (loose_route())
{
t_relay();
break;
};
if (uri==myself)
{
setflag(1);
if (method=="REGISTER")
{
log(1, "REGISTER message received\n");
if (!radius_www_authorize(""))
{
www_challenge("", "0");
break;
};
save("location");
break;
};
if (method=="INVITE")
{
log(1, "INVITE message received\n");
};
if (method=="ACK")
{
log(1, "ACK message received\n");
};
};
t_relay();
.... with this configuration ... I'm getting this Radius Output ...
radrecv: Accounting Request from host c0a801fd code=4, id=216,
length=278
Acct-Status-Type = Start
Service-Type = Sip-Session
Sip-Response-Code = 200
Sip-Method = Invite
User-Name = "1992005(a)192.168.1.253"
Calling-Station-Id = "sip:1992005@192.168.1.253:11005"
Called-Station-Id = "sip:1992001@192.168.1.253"
Sip-Translated-Request-URI =
"sip:1992001@192.168.1.113:11001;user=phone"
Acct-Session-Id =
"3F8FDBB3-E77D-4039-BE70-E89912A026E0(a)192.168.1.178"
Sip-To-Tag = "e711b276be6653cb"
Sip-From-Tag = "2604456034"
Sip-CSeq = "19560"
NAS-IP-Address = 192.168.1.253
NAS-Port-Id = 5060
Acct-Delay-Time = 0
Sending Accounting Ack of id 216 to c0a801fd (nas linux)
radrecv: Accounting Request from host c0a801fd code=4, id=217,
length=278
Acct-Status-Type = Start
Service-Type = Sip-Session
Sip-Response-Code = 200
Sip-Method = Bye
User-Name = "1992005(a)192.168.1.253"
Calling-Station-Id = "sip:1992005@192.168.1.253:11005"
Called-Station-Id = "sip:1992001@192.168.1.253"
Sip-Translated-Request-URI =
"sip:1992001@192.168.1.113:11001;user=phone"
Acct-Session-Id =
"3F8FDBB3-E77D-4039-BE70-E89912A026E0(a)192.168.1.178"
Sip-To-Tag = "e711b276be6653cb"
Sip-From-Tag = "2604456034"
Sip-CSeq = "19560"
NAS-IP-Address = 192.168.1.253
NAS-Port-Id = 5060
Acct-Delay-Time = 0
Sending Accounting Ack of id 217 to c0a801fd (nas linux)
Do you see ? ... first output corresponds to an INVITE message, and so
an Acct-Start message is received. But, instantly, just after
receiving
the INVITE message, I get a BYE message, but it also corresponds to an
Acct-Start message. I do not understand 2 things:
1) Why am I receiving both messages instantly and ..
2) Why the BYE message corresponds to an Acct-Start message.
Should not it be an Acct-Stop message ?
I just want to get an Acct-Stop message when Sip-Method == BYE or
CANCEL. But I can not achieve that. I've tried configuring
ser like this
...
if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL")
{
setflag(1);
};
... but the results where just the same.
I've been posting this problem many times but no one could
answer to me.
I just see some posts telling that people could do accounting
but their
configuration files are just the same as mine ... anyways ... if you
have any hint, I'll really apreaciate it.
Regards,
Lucas
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.7 - Release Date: 30/12/2004
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers