Bogdan,
On 01/16/2009 06:22 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Daniel,
You are rude and over the limit.
unfortunately you started ... I haven't said
statements like "you are a
funny man", you started, I replied.
so check your behavior first before speaking about the others.
I clearly see that the project is your play ground and
place to show
your frustration...
It is not my playground, openser/kamailio is (was all the time)
governed
by a management board, it is not one man project at is is yours:
http://www.kamailio.org/mos/view/Management/
..just a huge lack of respect for other people
here....
Technically speaking, I will not comment your aberrations ....
Regards,
Bogdan
PS: you know, do try to lie yourself and accept that openser split in
2 parts....whatever you like it or not.....if you think a SVN repo
defines a project, well....good luck....
Some developers left, that is ok, all the
time happens. But the project
is the same. You lie yourself and try to create confusion. Website and
sourceforge project are the same, with the content from the moment
openser project was started.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openser/
http://openser.sf.net
I have nothing against new projects based on openser, it shows it is
reliable and good project. But stop creating confusion. You can reply
about your project on your mailing lists, and don't say that it is the
continuation of openser.
When I started with openser, I admitted I do a fork and focused on
making a better project. Didn't try to say it is continuation of SER or
so. What you do is pathetic, just make your project better and people
will use it, do not use dirty tricks.
Daniel
PS. If you know you are saying the true, do not drop addresses from cc
list, it is nothing to hide.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
kamailio (openser) has for quite some time a parameter
in registrar
module that can overwrite from where to get the aor:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/registrar.html#id2467548
It is in the last two major release at least: openser 1.3.x and
kamailio 1.4.x
I like you logic here :)..you are funny man :)...
:-)) ...
now you are a good subject to make funny of....
You rushed and did a quick commit and then came back providing a link
to a feature that didn't existed few minutes ago ... and yes it is
funny, because the similar behavior could be achieved already (so
initial link with few more details could get it done).
The newer being better (how much better, have you tested?!?!) or not
is another topic. Don't forget to remove the old, lazy one, you can
do it in 30sec... (or, ahhh, you may want to preserve backward
compatibility, sorry...)
modparam("registrar", "aor_avp", "$avp(i:3223)")
$avp(i:3223) = $fu;
if(registered())
{
...
}
Of course this notation is present since openser 1.3 and it was
inherited by both OpenSIPS 1.4.4 and Kamilio 1.4.3,
You mean: opensips got it when
replicated the source repository, as
Kamailio is the same project with OpenSER, you may want to check the
source tree repository:
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openser/
So nothing to get from openser to kamailio, the are the same and only
one project.
but now we try to get a better approach of this
functionality: why
put the value into an AVP and let the function search all the time
for that AVP (set or not set), when you can simply take advantage
and directly pass the value as parameter to the function. You get
read of (1) useless transit via an AVP and (2) useless AVP search
all the time. Also you get a more compact and clear scripting....
Then start
moving module parameters specifying avps to be get as
input for functions to parameters of the functions (e.g., you can
begin with tm) -- you know that also from openser, opensips got
support for config functions with more than two parameters.
Daniel
Regards,
Bogdan
Cheers,
Daniel
> Michel,
>
> The proper way to do this -- assuming your motive is security and
> authorisation -- is to challenge the incoming INVITE initial
> request of the caller (who is supposed to be registered) with a
> 407 proxy challenge, i.e. proxy_authorize()/proxy_challenge().
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Michel,
>>
>> See the registered() function from the registrar module:
>>
>>
http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.4.x/registrar.html#id271407
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bogdan
>>
>> michel freiha wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>> I need to ask please about which function should I use in order
>>> to check while making a call if the user who is dialing the
>>> number is making the call from a registered account or not?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users(a)lists.opensips.org
>>>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)lists.opensips.org
>>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com